Jump to content

1/48 - Yakovlev Yak-9DD/TD & Yak-9D by Modelsvit - released - new Foxbot Decals


Homebee

Recommended Posts

Homebee - would you please correct the topic name. Now it's:

Yakovlev Yak-9DD & Yak-9A & D by Modelsvit - Yak-9DD released - Yak-9D & Yak-9A release in 2020 - Yak-7 resin conversion set by Vector

There have never been anything like the Yak-9A. Thus it should read:

Yakovlev Yak-9DD & Yak-7A & Yak-9D by Modelsvit - Yak-9DD released - Yak-9D & Yak-7A release in 2020 - Yak-7 resin conversion set by Vector

Cheers

Michael

Edited by KRK4m
a misprint
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KRK4m said:

Homebee - would you please correct the topic name. Now it's:

Yakovlev Yak-9DD & Yak-9A & D by Modelsvit - Yak-9DD released - Yak-9D & Yak-9A release in 2020 - Yak-7 resin conversion set by Vector

There have never been anything like the Yak-9A. Thus ist should read:

Yakovlev Yak-9DD & Yak-7A & Yak-9D by Modelsvit - Yak-9DD released - Yak-9D & Yak-7A release in 2020 - Yak-7 resin conversion set by Vector

Cheers

Michael

 

Yeah, I had the same thought - there was never a Yak-9A, the initial version was simply designated Yak-9 (no suffix), right?

 

John

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, John Thompson said:

 

Yeah, I had the same thought - there was never a Yak-9A, the initial version was simply designated Yak-9 (no suffix), right?

 

John

Yes, John. When talking about the Yaks you're always right :)

The Yak-7DI (thus -7B with metal wing spars, larger fuel tanks and one MG less) when put into series production has been renamed simply the Yak-9.

Cheers

Michael

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 02/10/2019 at 17:13, John Thompson said:

Looks great! Maybe with Modelsvit making such a commitment to the Yak-9 series in 1/48, someone will pick up on doing the same in 1/72. The recent attention to the Yak-1b in one-seventytooth (excellent kits from Brengun and Arma) is encouraging!

 

John

To see new-mould 1/72nd scale kits of the Yak-9D, Yak-9DD, and the Yak-9T would be brilliant! 

 

Regards,

 

Jason

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

02e43b440b9b44d3cab254ae1ba587be.jpg 02e43b440b9b44d3cab254ae1ba587be.jpg 02e43b440b9b44d3cab254ae1ba587be.jpg

 

Source: https://www.facebook.com/groups/greenmats/permalink/3024505224275666/

 

Quote

Hello Friends,
Maybe someone of you know that in the end of 1944, a small amount of Yak-9D (Early vers.) were converted into 2-seat night interceptors with more powerful armament and radio locator. So, we have decided to recreate this unfamiliar modification under designation Yak-9SD in 1/48 scale.
Greetings!!

 

91707291-2620452608223774-20678189668011

 

91185533-2620452704890431-54213164907815 91216359-2620452574890444-88074395097602

 

91234738-2620452674890434-36974071045381 92018367-2620452594890442-20358906523691

 

V.P.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Yak-9D sprues

Source: https://www.facebook.com/modelsvit/posts/2666066990329002

 

Quote

Hello fellows!

We are continuing our work on WWII Yak's family in 1/48 scale.

Below you can find first test shots of the new Yak-9D, being fully 3D designed!

In few months we expect to be ready with the other sprues, decals and photo-etch sheet.

 

 

99127664-2666066486995719-10287444308923

 

98460892-2666066736995694-88522424611084


100093728-2666066500329051-2491392365269

 

100514838-2666066560329045-3784702203160

 

100374160-2666066476995720-3580690801333

 

99138933-2666066640329037-45840299251445

 

V.P.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Graham Boak said:

What's a TD?  A long range T?  Or just not-quite-as-inventive as the SD?

 

From Red Stars 5 reference the Yak-9T - "from the 11th batch (Feb 1944) onwards all machines were built with four tanks holding a total of 480 litres. When the 37-mm Nudel'man/Sooranov cannon was installed, the model was designated Yak-9TD".

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mike Esposito said:

Which variant to get? Hmmmm. 37mm for AtA work seems wrong....probably the D. 😁

You don't have to use it for A2A work you know, you can use it for what it was designed for - ground pounding ;) 

 

I just hope they give us more Yak-9 versions, I would love to see a recce Yak-9R.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears that it's Modelsvit - "В коробке Як-9ДД от фирмы Modelsvit" = "In the box Yak-9DD from the company Modelsvit", according to Google Translate:

https://leib-company.ru/voennye-samolety/19168-zebrano-48001-istrebitel-yak-9dd-i-toplivozapravsshik-bz-38-1-48.html

 

John

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, John Thompson said:

It appears that it's Modelsvit - "В коробке Як-9ДД от фирмы Modelsvit" = "In the box Yak-9DD from the company Modelsvit", according to Google Translate:

https://leib-company.ru/voennye-samolety/19168-zebrano-48001-istrebitel-yak-9dd-i-toplivozapravsshik-bz-38-1-48.html

 

John

Thanks. I shouldn't have been so lazy and just Googled the product number! Chrome translates that page automatically, not that "Modelsvit" needs translating ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Graham Boak said:

Yes, the 37mm was designed for Air to air, and very popular as a "sniper".  The P-39 was also designed and built with a 37mm, part of the reason the Russians liked it.

I thought the T stands for Tahnkovyy, which I believe translates to tank-busting? I don't speak Russian so I'm only going from what I've read, but I do realise it was used against aircraft.

 

The Lagg-3 also used a 37mm cannon, the Sh-37 which they used against bombers.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably a case where it was designed for one thing (anti-tank warfare) but used where the opportunity arose against aircraft. There was also the Yak-9K with its massive 45 mm cannon, again designed as a tank destroyer. Either weapon would have had such a recoil force as to make it difficult to aim for sustained fire against anything more maneuverable than a tank or a bomber, and even then it was seemingly intended that one round would do the job.

 

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, John Thompson said:

Probably a case where it was designed for one thing (anti-tank warfare) but used where the opportunity arose against aircraft. There was also the Yak-9K with its massive 45 mm cannon, again designed as a tank destroyer. Either weapon would have had such a recoil force as to make it difficult to aim for sustained fire against anything more maneuverable than a tank or a bomber, and even then it was seemingly intended that one round would do the job.

 

John

Yes the NS-45 was a beast, though a bit too much for the Yak-9 structure. The Yak-9K ended up being used mainly for ground attack because of the lack of German bombers being used by that time in the war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...