Jump to content

HK Models 1/32 DH Mosquito


Stephen

Recommended Posts

Its not a 1 peice fuselage, its 2 peices, split at the strengthening band near the TE of the wing, due to the shape, no tooling in the world could create that shape in injection moulding

Edited by markjames68
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to see the tooling for that one piece nose and fuselage section. Looked great at Telford..

I bet it looks like one of those little Transformers :wacko: It took a minute for it to sink in when Dave said "it's a two part fuselage". I'm going to blame the drugs, but when it did finally get through my thick head, I was mightily impressed. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the pics l saw of the sprue the fuselage is made of four halves. Could a Fighter version coming too? Makes sense as the forward fuselage it totally different including where the entry hatch is. Have to wait and see. Doesn't matter l am :Tasty: drooling at the bomber version as l sit here looking at it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the pics l saw of the sprue the fuselage is made of four halves. Could a Fighter version coming too? Makes sense as the forward fuselage it totally different including where the entry hatch is. Have to wait and see. Doesn't matter l am :Tasty: drooling at the bomber version as l sit here looking at it

I do hope there is an FB in the pipeline as I'd like one of these kits to do a costal command aircraft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Does look good! I liked the Airfix 1/24 version a lot too, although slightly too big when finished as it's a twin.

1/32 Version looks like a must, also looks to be much more detailed than the Airfix version. Nice idea on the canopy internal frames. I really hope HK release the Lancaster also, was hoping for it, this year :wall: .

I have their amazing B-17G and there Do-335 still awaiting build :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

personally i am now think of spending my money on the airfix 1:24 mosquito re release, could be more value for money/more modelling time.

cheers

jerry

Perhaps,

Shame they are not releasing the bomber or PR MK.IV version with the glass nose this time round.

I did enjoy the Airfix 1/24 Version a great deal.

Maybe again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does look good! I liked the Airfix 1/24 version a lot too, although slightly too big when finished as it's a twin.

1/32 Version looks like a must, also looks to be much more detailed than the Airfix version. Nice idea on the canopy internal frames. I really hope HK release the Lancaster also, was hoping for it, this year :wall: .

I have their amazing B-17G and there Do-335 still awaiting build :)

Sorry I think molding the Throttle assembly and all the interior boxes on the port side of the cockpit a backward step, the Airfix Mossie's only glaring problems in the Cockpit is the throttle torque tubes behind the seats and too many ejection marks, also the internal canopy framing is much better represented in the Airfix Kit imo ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps,

Shame they are not releasing the bomber or PR MK.IV version with the glass nose this time round.

I did enjoy the Airfix 1/24 Version a great deal.

Maybe again?

Hi

maybe someone will do some AM ?

cheers

jerry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a passing interest in this kit only because I have an old Revell kit converted into an FBVI last century but I must say, given the likely cost. it would have been better to at least have the throttle box as a separate assembly and the pilot's seat looks a bit odd to me. I really hope those ejector marks go in production examples unless you get a free tube of Green Stuff with every kit!! But maybe, being wooden, the real thing had a lot of round access panels?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not access panels Simon, they are ferrules onto which equipment/fittings were attached.

Thanks for clarifying Dave, I think I will have to check my Mossie references as there seem to be an awful lot of them!!

Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...