Chaotic Mike Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 This is accompanied by an colour A3 panting and decaling guide... Calm down... It's not *that* good, is it? ;-) Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Test Graham Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 I suspect Antoine is referring to the fins or gills that provide extra cooling area around each cylinder. Clearly they are far too fine for an accurate representation in 1/72, but most kits do attempt to show such by a series of raised rings rather than just a smooth surface. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KoenL Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 Thanks for the review! Does the kit come with both enginestyles and both exhaust styles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbit Leader Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 (edited) Thanks for the review! Does the kit come with both enginestyles and both exhaust styles? Just the "Standard" as shown in the lower diagram. Best to check as many photos as possible, so that you depict the correct intakes / exhaust for your aircraft. I believe some of the great options shown in the new Xtradecal sheet may use the "early" style. At least the 61 squadron one does. Ref. Lancaster Mk.II Profile Publications #235 - page 6. Cheers... Dave Edited August 8, 2013 by Rabbit Leader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antoine Posted August 8, 2013 Share Posted August 8, 2013 I suspect Antoine is referring to the fins or gills that provide extra cooling area around each cylinder. Clearly they are far too fine for an accurate representation in 1/72, but most kits do attempt to show such by a series of raised rings rather than just a smooth surface. Exactly, Graham. I'd just checked with the picture linked above, and indeed, those parts are way too thin to be represented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff_B Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 There is another gripe with the bomb load being provided with the Bomber Support Set, great set up potential there except for a couple of missed chances. Firstly their are no Bomber Support Maintenance crew, MT drivers or even standing around bomber crew provided to pose with the kits, just a single pilot in the Lancaster (the soft plastic 40 yr old RAF personnel just doesnt cut it for this job) and on the Lancaster the access doors are closed. Would have been nice to see the crew doors open and the ladders provided !. Still its a nice kit and a welcome edition, and it could be interesting to see what other versions get released next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddy Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 There is another gripe with the bomb load being provided with the Bomber Support Set, great set up potential there except for a couple of missed chances. Firstly their are no Bomber Support Maintenance crew, MT drivers or even standing around bomber crew provided to pose with the kits, just a single pilot in the Lancaster (the soft plastic 40 yr old RAF personnel just doesnt cut it for this job) and on the Lancaster the access doors are closed. Would have been nice to see the crew doors open and the ladders provided !. Still its a nice kit and a welcome edition, and it could be interesting to see what other versions get released next year You could always try these: http://www.relishmodels.co.uk/revell-1-72-raf-wwii-pilots-and-groundcrew.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody37 Posted August 9, 2013 Author Share Posted August 9, 2013 You could always try these: http://www.relishmodels.co.uk/revell-1-72-raf-wwii-pilots-and-groundcrew.html I've got that set and it's pretty good, many of the figures have separate arms, some have separate heads, but the plastic is very soft, almost rubbery which can sometimes be a pain removing flash from the mould seems. They'll certainly be getting used in the near future though The cylinders are a little bland compared to others I've seen where the cooling fins have been attempted, though I do know from doing the CMR B.II conversion that with the hubs on, you don't see much inside the cowling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody37 Posted August 9, 2013 Author Share Posted August 9, 2013 Just the "Standard" as shown in the lower diagram. Best to check as many photos as possible, so that you depict the correct intakes / exhaust for your aircraft. I believe some of the great options shown in the new Xtradecal sheet may use the "early" style. At least the 61 squadron one does. Ref. Lancaster Mk.II Profile Publications #235 - page 6. Cheers... Dave Hopefully, the aftermarket will pick this opportunity up to provide the later intakes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddy Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 I've got that set and it's pretty good, many of the figures have separate arms, some have separate heads, but the plastic is very soft, almost rubbery which can sometimes be a pain removing flash from the mould seems. They'll certainly be getting used in the near future though The cylinders are a little bland compared to others I've seen where the cooling fins have been attempted, though I do know from doing the CMR B.II conversion that with the hubs on, you don't see much inside the cowling. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to remember as a lad, Airfix produced a model of the Bloodhound missile that came complete with launcher, Land Rover, etc and (I'm sure) at least one styrene crew figure. So they have produced 1/72 figures in material other than that used their other figure sets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggers Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Good review woody. Though the Lanc II has never really lit my fire(I'm a Merlin man myself),it should produce a very nice model. Just a tip for builders of any Lanc,the F.E's "dicky seat" in this kit is depicted folded down so that the F.E can sit on it. There isn't a lot of room in a Lanc'pit at the best of times(who's been inside Just Jane?), there's even less with the dicky seat folded down. 99.9% of the time the F.E was standing up either at his panel or looking out of the cockpit,scanning the skies. Take-off and landing meant helping the skipper with power settings,flaps,etc, you all know the routine. Modify the seat so that it's folded up against the side. It's top edge(when folded up) should just be level with the cockpit sill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff_B Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 You could always try these: http://www.relishmodels.co.uk/revell-1-72-raf-wwii-pilots-and-groundcrew.html Yeap got that set but its mostly Pilots with only 4 ground crew, but it does show what can be done and that airfix could tailor a set to go with the Bomber Support Set and act as crew for in a Lanc or stood outside. In fact it would be quite nice to have Aircrew in flight gear sat/stood in the crew transports such as the Tilly & Bedford or use the QLT (Airfix or the 72nd IBG Bedfords and CMPs) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antoine Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 The cylinders are a little bland compared to others I've seen where the cooling fins have been attempted, though I do know from doing the CMR B.II conversion that with the hubs on, you don't see much inside the cowling. That's right. I've only asked because I was not familiar with the thinness of those specific cylinders. Airfix's engineering choice is perfectly understandable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flankerman Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Dunno about quality, but 'Armory' are doing some resin RAF Crew sets..... http://armoryhobbyshop.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=34951 http://armoryhobbyshop.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=34949 http://armoryhobbyshop.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=34950 http://armoryhobbyshop.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=34922 Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOUSTON Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 Impressive, succinct review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Jephcott Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 So - I'm thinking about getting mine onto the bench later today - but I was wondering... Has anyone got any further information on the engine stays? As Woody pointed out, I'd believe that there were 3 of them irregularly mounted in each engine, but the kit has them molded with 4? I'm wondering if this is an oversight or if someone has a piece of information that I haven't yet seen to suggest this is correct? I've tried to find a photo but so far, I haven't been able to find what I'm looking for! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mxyzptlk Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 My BII arrived this morning (via Amazon). I did find this picture of one of the two aircraft in the kit. Doesn't help much on the mounts unfortunately... http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2755/4334623751_82bef7452d_b.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny'be'bad Posted April 13, 2015 Share Posted April 13, 2015 getting this kit for its engines abit of tweakin their goin on my airfix hallybag wings then onto my revell hallybag........sorted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woody37 Posted April 13, 2015 Author Share Posted April 13, 2015 I've got the engines left over from the Lincoln build. They'll be getting used for the same reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now