Jump to content

fingers

Members
  • Posts

    243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fingers

  1. Thanks Dave. They both have their good points, but if I buy another it will be the Meng. As good as the Takom one is, I can't justify paying nearly twice the price for it.

    In general, the differences are:

    Tracks - They both look the same when assembled, but Takom's are far more robust during handling and painting.

    Construction - Both similar. Meng use fewer parts for the hull, which makes aligning everything easier. They did make one minor mistake on the tooling. The hole for the radiator filler cap on the bonnet is only half moulded and needs opening up. I didn't do it on this one as it was a review piece and was built OOB (and also because I forgot).

    Accuracy - Apart from the above issue, they're both pretty much correct.

    Details - Again, both are good, but the Meng one has the on board tools. Takom only has empty clasps.

    Markings - Probably better choices on the Meng decal sheet, but for some reason they only show two of them in the guide, so you'll need to do a little research. Most of the supplied options are shown in the New Vanguard books on the Whippet and the Russian civil war.

    Andy

    Thanks for the mini review Andy, It's always useful to get a genuine modellers opinion especially one whose done such a good job with both kits.

    Dave

    • Like 1
  2. BRIEF STATEMENT ABOUT BLACKBURN BUCCANEER PROJECT.

    Dear forum members and our friends;

    First of all, thank you all for your interest in TANMODEL brand and our projects.

    Yes, we are planning to release Blackburn Buccaneer S.2 kit and we made some progress in 3D design. However we will release this project in 1/72 scale.

    Regards,

    TANMODEL

    http://www.tanmodel.com

    http://www.facebook.com/tanmodel

    Does that discount a 1/48 in the future?

    Dave

  3. Okay now to give a slightly different method, I use a scalpel with a curved blade (No 10 I think) starting from the remaining good panel line I carefully rock it until the tip enters the other good panel line thus making a fine line, I then take another curved blade which is blunter and has been roughly sharpened so that there are lines across the blade and draw this along the line to file out some materiel and open out the slot. After the line is in place a combination of needle/scriber/probe and micromesh is applied to, hopefully, give a panel line which matches the others.

    The dental probe looks a good tool and using thin glue/MEK is a good idea.

  4. Isn't it true to say that the Luftwaffe aircraft had dirty brown stains due to the quality, octane and base (coal as against oil) of the fuel they had available towards the end of the war?

    That was probably VW getting involved somewhere :winkgrin:

    Interesting thought though

    I read it somewhere and if you look at the staining on some of there aircraft (one shot of a Ju 88 comes to mind) you can believe it.

  5. No, the tailplane on the Lightning had 0 degrees di/anhedral. At rest, however, the tailplane often adopted an aircraft "up" position (t/p leading edge down) giving the impression that it had dihedral.

    HTH

    Dennis

    So it would be fair to attach horizontal left to right and fore to aft?

  6. Slight deviation from original subject, but as many of you have much more Lightning knowledge than myself here goes.

    The tail plane on an Airfix Lightning has a sloppy fix which doesn't hold to give a positive angle my question is when in a 'neutral' position is the tail horizontal or does it have some an/di-hedral?

  7. Superb! What did you use?

    Okay, you probably won't believe this, but I used, holds breath, discs cut from a cotton bud stalk and some drinks can aluminium (well annealed).

    Once I started hacking and gluing it all fell together quite quickly.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...