Jump to content
This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

chaddy

Members
  • Content Count

    1,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

268 Excellent

About chaddy

  • Rank
    Very Obsessed Member
  • Birthday 08/11/1947

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Manchester
  • Interests
    Apart from modelling, mountaineering and photography.

Recent Profile Visitors

2,497 profile views
  1. chaddy

    Inspiration

    Thank you very much. Like you I found myself getting more involved with discussions and research rather than building. I just got out of the habit I guess. Good to see you back too. Cheers!
  2. chaddy

    Inspiration

    Many thanks...didn't realise how much I've missed this.
  3. chaddy

    Inspiration

    I must have been away from this site for a few years now, for various reasons. I'm afraid modelling has had to take a back seat during that time. Anyway I've been in self isolation and now in 'lock down'. So I'm going to need to fill my time. I've just been re-visiting my stash and trying to decide what kit to re-launch my model building. I must admit that whilst I've been away I've missed all the great builds, pics, info and chats on here. I'm looking forward to 'getting back into it', during this period of isolation, and getting inspiration from you lot! Cheers! It's good to be back!
  4. It appears that yours doesn't seem to a number of sink holes around the MU turret that mine does!
  5. Well done Ced! This has been an epic on the the scale of a Cecil B DeMille production. You've beaten this build into submission and come out on top. Excellent.
  6. I see that the description on the decals is incorrect. 10 Sqn. were definitely not at Leeming in 'late 1943'. They were at Melbourne, and had been for some time. They left Leeming on 19 Aug 1942 when it was handed over to the RCAF.
  7. Exactly right for a parked Halifax...oh wait! Yours is flying...
  8. Indeed there is a small blister there. That is Mod 904. It seems to be located further aft on this aircraft than usual. It was usually position over the front edge of the small window in the bomb aimer's position. Presumably to allow him to follow the track of the bombs. It is a feature of aircraft with the perspex nose. See Merrick's "Halifax: From Hell to Victory and Beyond", for examples of aircraft with this blister in differing positions.
  9. Fair enough. I think Ced has enough info now Unless he'd like me to post the combat report that 'proves' JB910 had the aforementioned blister.......
  10. Michael The initial, unofficial, installation was carried out by Cheshire's squadron 76. The actual mod number for the perspex blister was Mod639B. Many MkIIs were retrofitted with the new fin and rudder assembly (Mod814) at their bases. The ones you refer to are probably those that had retained the perspex blister where fitted.
  11. It's an observation blister. The original Merlin engined Halifax lacked poke and squadrons took all possible measures to reduce weight and generally 'clean up' the aircraft. One of these measures was the removal of the MU turret. At the same time they were aware of the problem of night fighter attacks from below and behind. You are correct to say that they utilised surplus side observation blisters for this purpose. Having removed the mid upper turret the surplus to requirements gunner spent his time lying on his belly keeping a lookout for enemy aircraft. That is the sole purpose of the blister. I had this confirmed by a F/E of 10 Sqn, who was on the squadron Feb 43 to Sept 43. There is even a Mod Number for it if I can find it in my records. Of course later improvements to the performance of the MkIIs (from late spring early/ 1943) allowed the installation of the lower profile MU turret, and the gunner returned to his original occupation. There is absolutely no doubt that JB910 had one such blister. There are a number of pics of 10 Sqn aircraft so equipped. There are also photographs showing MK11s with the new MU turret and the blister, (see pic). The only thing Im not sure of is if the likes of JB910 and JB911 left the factory with them fitted and the MU turret removed.
  12. 'Thanks chaddy - luckily JB910 is 'an early' and doesn't have the window or the bumpy bit. That's my story and I'm sticking to it! ' Unfortunately Ced the very fact that it is an 'early one' means that it does have the blister underneath. Apart from the fact I have an eyewitness account I also have the 'proof'..... Edit: There is a well known pic of JB911 at Elvington in July 1943 that shows the same feature...and on the aircraft on the ground, so......
  13. Have you given any though as to how to deal with the perspex observation blister on the underside of the fuselage yet Ced? It can be see in the pic, just any of the H2S dome.
  14. Here's another view. (Great, I seem to be handling this Flikr malarkey quite well now).
  15. Just to keep the pot boiling and your interest in JB910 going (no backsliding and modelling a different aircraft). Sorry for the poor quality of the scan, but the copy I obtained from the RAF Museum wasn't that good. Herewith a potted history of the life of JB910:
×
×
  • Create New...