Jump to content

Rob 1

Members
  • Posts

    1,020
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Rob 1

  1. Can I test here - please delete if needed.

     

    AEJleRicetty4cUY9Ys8A0ZqMaSqmVQQwLm8zCgM

     

     - - - - - - 

    Post edit: - seems to have worked.

     

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/HiAdSFnpXnbAJZrP6

     

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/HiAdSFnpXnbAJZrP6

     

    Anyone else using the Google Photos hosting, note it is a two stage operation - 1. host the photo and get the link, 2. get the link embedded ready for external linking (as partial quote below from 'Gorby' on 11th November 2019)

     

    Quote

     


    On Google Photos, open the photo you want to use and click the 'Share' icon.

    Click 'Create Link' and then 'Copy'.

    Go to https://ctrlq.org/google/photos/  paste the GP link into the first box and press 'Generate Code'.

    After a couple of seconds it will show the new code – copy the contents of the the 'Direct Link (URL)' box.

    You just need to paste that new code into your post.

    If you use a lot of photos this may be too much of a hassle to have to do for every photo, but obviously, only you can decide if you want an easier option

     

  2. 3 hours ago, Chewbacca said:

    I've often imagined what VANGUARD would have been like sat off the coast of Kuwait in 1991 alongside MISSOURI and WISCONSIN.  Keep the 15 inch turrets but replace the secondary armament with Sea Wolf, Sea Dart, TLAM and Goalkeeper. 

    That would have been quite something. Gunfire support is still a big role in naval support and fills a gap not much else can, and gunfire on the scale of 15" (RN) and 16" (USN) guns is in a league of it's own, like continual high intensity air support but with no risk to any aircraft.

     

    Also if available for a similar role in the Falklands Conflict that huge range and power of gunfire would have been able to pummel almost anywhere on the islands without response, it's quite possible they would have surrendered before things got serious on the ground. (subject to sorting out point defence and ASM/SSM vulnerabilities).

    • Like 2
  3. Yes, it's interesting to consider what a later class of RN battleship could have been like after the collapse of the building treaties - two triple 16" turrets forward and one aft would fit the almost standard contemporary layout of the time, but the secondary armament would certainly have progressed, perhaps 8 x twin 5.25" like King George V and later the Vanguard, and octuple 2 pdrs, or later quad 40mm Bofors.

     

    Could even consider a hybrid British built and main armed ship but some other secondaries such as 10 mounts of the excellent US twin 5" with their proximity fused shells and fire control systems, and loads of quad Bofors - that would be fairly formidable.

    • Like 3
  4. That is a great diorama, with great imagination and well executed.

    This is the sort of scene at public open days that got me hooked on the Royal Navy and warships in general in my younger days, and your diorama captures the scene perfectly.

    This could inspire me to get an Atlantic kit of a Cold War subject and have a go at one.

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...