Jump to content

nheather

Gold Member
  • Content Count

    775
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

971 Excellent

About nheather

  • Rank
    Obsessed Member
  • Birthday 10/10/1963

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Horsham, West Sussex

Recent Profile Visitors

2,372 profile views
  1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-56792530 Hopefully this one looks recoverable, but I'm sure there will be a fair amount of damage and a lot of time and effort to get her flying again.
  2. So my experiment continues. The first thing to note is that by no means am I a prolific or focussed builder, I get easily distracted so I’m not one to sit for hours at a time working on a model. But this week I have been off work so I have put in three or four one hour long sessions working on the PE on my Tamiya Universal Carrier - first thing to note, I reckon that a determined person could assemble the OOB kit including part preparation but without any painting in under four hours. By contrast I have managed to put the PE on the top deck that runs down the centre of the passen
  3. My Proops drills arrived today - a little pricey at £7 for 10 - but light years better than the jobber ones from eBay. I’m drilling plastic figures for pinning onto bases. The jobber ones just spin and make an indent at best. The Proops ones cut through the plastic like a hot knife through butter. Cheers, Nigel
  4. I’ve decided to educate myself with PE, like many it has scared me off starting some kits in my stash. So I have picked a kit that I don’t made going bad - it’s a Tamiya Universal Carrier in 1:35 and I have the Eduard PE kit. The PE kit has around 100 parts, the Tamiya kit has around 80 parts to give an idea of scale. I read that many are selective in what PE they use and rarely use all the parts in a PE kit. I don’t have that expertise yet so I have decided to use all the PE to educate myself about what changes are worth the effort and what are not.
  5. Have you used this, is it really any different to CA, would you recommend it. I have Zap thin, medium and slow already, don’t mind spending the best part of a tenner for some of this but don’t want to find that it is just plain old CA with a fancy name. Cheers, Nigel
  6. Coincidentally, there is an adjacent post by someone asking the same about Milliput. You can try this. Cut of the piece you want to use. Put in the microwave for a few seconds. Don’t blast it or you might turn it to liquid, just do it in steps, maybe start with 5 seconds, see what it is like, try another 5 seconds and so on. If it is very old, you may need to cut out a bit where the blue and yellow join as it has cured a little. Cheers, Nigel
  7. I am doing an experiment, a bit of learning exercise. I have a fairly cheap model that I’m prepared to sacrifice as a test bed - a Tamiya 1:35 Universal Carrier (Bren Gun Carrier if you prefer) and the Eduard photo etch kit. The photo etch is around 100 parts and you can well imagine that as the Universal Carrier is small, even in 1:35, most of the photo etch parts are tiny. So rather than be selective about which PE to use I’ve decided to try and use it all as a learning exercise, to teach me what PE features are worth it and which aren’t. One thing I’m no
  8. Not tried it, but I too have heard a few seconds in the microwave rejuvenates green stuff so I reckon it would work the same for Milliput. Cheers, Nigel
  9. I admire your commitment to modify the standard RCAF kit, not something I could even dream of doing, mind you when I see a lot of the work done on this site I am simply left in awe. Personally, when I look at the Super Chipmunk, the only reason I can tell it is a Chipmunk is because I am aware of the history of its origin. Without that if you were to show me pictures of an RCAF Chipmunk and a Super Chipmunk I might admit some similarities but I would conclude that they are different aircraft. The Super Chipmunk has a bigger engine (70% more powerful), the cowling is co
  10. Yep, that’s a Super Chipmunk. Designed for aerobatics, more powerful engine, bigger control surfaces for aerobatics - look at the rudder for example. The kits you have been looking at are the standard service aircraft used by the RAF and RCAF. The RCAF did have a bubble canopy but it is still pretty much standard, not like the Super Chipmunk that your grandfather flew. There are radio control models, that’s how I was aware of it, but to my knowledge, not a plastic model. Example of one of the RC models https://www.stevewebb.co.uk/index.php?pi
  11. You said that your grandfather flew aerobatics in a Chipmunk, just checking that this wasn’t in a Super Chipmunk rather than a RCAF Chipmunk. Do you have photos of the aircraft he flew? Cheers, Nigel
  12. It appeals to me but like many I struggle to use it. Think I have spent as much on photo etch tools (bending jigs, pliers, CA applicators, positioning probes) than on all my other tools and comparatively they barely get used. I really question some of the tinier parts (because of my lack of skill) and question whether the slightly mis-positioned detail they add is worth the CA scarring around them. And some parts don’t look right because they are flat - a good example is that I do 1:35 armour and PE sets often include chains - that doesn’t look right. The o
  13. What metal, how thick, what size holes, are you looking for something hand held or on a drill press. Whatever the answers, I feel the solution lies in the drill bits rather than the thing that spins them. Cheers, Nigel
  14. Well they have arrived - the good news is that they were shipped and delivered very quickly. Now the bad news. Firstly, one of the bags only contained 4 drills (there should be 10) and I found a tear in the bottom of the bag so I guess they have been falling out. If that were the only problem it would be easily resolved. But I tried a few and they are very blunt compared with what I had been using - I may as well use piano wire, probably no worse. So I’m sending them back. Cheers, Nigel
  15. I don’t think commisioning a job would be cost realistic - it’s not like detailed figures are not already available, it’s just that as they are metal and because you need so many it costs a lot. 1:72 packs like Airfix, Revell, Zevezda, HaT are nicely priced but unfortunately don’t lend themselves to rank and file units because of the variety of different poses in each box - the cavalry and artillery are pretty good it is the infantry that are the issue. Cheers, Nigel
×
×
  • Create New...