Jump to content

sharkmouth

Members
  • Content Count

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sharkmouth

  1. Well, the OEZ (KP/Eduard) kit is now the low end, Hobby Boss (based on Mr, song's work when he was with Trumpeter) is second, with Kitty Hawk (Mr. Song's latest) being the best so far. Who scanned the German museum's fitter? Not AMK, doubtful it is ICM as they have examples much closer... then who? Who had been scanning aircraft lately? Personally, I got rid of my OEZ kit in the hopes of the new ones but haven't picked up any instead... I can wait it out. Regards,
  2. After reading through all 18 pages of the thread on scalemodels.ru, I see that the Russians seem to agree that the belly of the fuselage is the issue. They had others such as the nose gear being too far back while the main gears are too far forward. The Russians seem to enjoy overlaying images of the KH CAD on top of photos of the real aircraft. Some even had some nicely done plans with cross sections. Here are just a few of the images to be found on the forum. Last, they didn't seem to have the fuselage problem Doog did and they did point out that he mounted the KKR pod backwards and for
  3. Luckily, Russian is easier for me to understand than some English from Argentina... The upper abbreviation is for KP and the lower is for KH. Below is the post on scalemodels.ru: http://scalemodels.ru/modules/forum/viewtopic_t_66599_start_0.html Regards,
  4. Still waiting on my kit... I don't mind some surgery... Yet, while I wait, the Modelsvit kits are becoming more tempting (even if in 72nd scale). Regards,
  5. Terry, sounds like you wasted your money on that SAC o' crap. It is rumored they once (perhaps twice) corrected kit parts prior to casting but most are simply casting the kit parts as they are with seams, knock out pin marks (with the expected raised or sunken areas), and the added flash. Regards,
  6. The empty areas around the mid and rear sections are probably clearance for the multi-part mold to impress details. The fact the the outer edges do not have sprue tree gates and the inner gates trees are half round bear this out. II'll know for sure when I get my kit. I'd love for Kitty Hawk to release many variants. Regards,
  7. I have the Trumpeter kit, very nice but maybe missing some parts that this kit includes.
  8. Trumpeter would have one use the older cockpit tub (not the newly tooled one on the new sprue tree), Looking at images of the 9.19 cockpit, it looks more like the new cockpit tub... strange! Regards,
  9. It turns out that the Indian MiG-29UPG (izd. 9-20) will require removing the raised rectangles (lights) from the outer sides of the vertical tail plus adding new sensors (large one on the starboard fin and small ones under the wings near the tips.). Regards,
  10. Well kotey, you spoiled me with 5 sharkmouth schemes on your first Fulcrum sheet! I ended up buying it twice (48th & 72nd scales). General Designer, I can't see the images (they are blocked at work) but thank you for pointing out where I can find the decal sheet. Regards,
  11. I almost forgot. Trumpeter's kit replaces the upper fuselage (I'm comparing it to their 9.12 release), a sprue tree with vertical fins, IFR probe (can be built extended or stowed), instrument panel, and avionics cooling intake, a new canopy, and a new weapon sprue tree Q2 (R-77 and Kh-31). Of course, a new and uninspired decal sheet as well. Problem is, the instructions tell you to build two Kh-31 missiles and then you realize there is only one sprue tree. The parts map indicate only one sprue tree however, said sprue tree only allows the build of one missile.
  12. They don't really interest me as much. Begemot will release the Algerian markings, among others. One strange thing about the SMT is that there are three rather different aircraft with the name; product 9.17, 9.18, and 9.19. The one on the cover of the Famous Russian Aircraft - Muikoyan MiG-29 caught my attention and is a MiG-29SMT but the product with the 9.12 upper fuselage: You can barely make out the Cyrillic stylizes MiG and the SMT on the out side of the starboard vertical fin. Regards,
  13. Glad I found this thread! I have Trumpeter's 9.12 & 9.19 (the second nose is for this version, the MiG-29SMT), Zvezda's 9.13 (two sharkmouth schemes on the sheet so I may get another kit, Trumpeter or Zvezda?), and two Italeri MiG-29 (9.12). Since I also have 48th scale kits (Academy MiG-29A & UB plus GWH 9.12 Early (2x)), 9.12 Late (German scheme), and 9.13), I feel ready to tackle all the sharkmouth markings from Begemot, Hi-Decal, and others. Regards,
  14. Just got it and it is very nice although the decals are boring. Kotey, know of any shark mouth schemes? Regards,
  15. you need to upload the images to a host and then use the link. I am curious to see your work... Regards,
  16. That was pointed out and Roy says he'll consider it if sales are good for these items. I have intake covers, just in case. Regards,
  17. Since I have the kit, I will! After all, it is the reason I posted since there are quite a few owners of the kit who now can build a more accurate Foxbat until (more like if) AMK releases their model. There is also the ICM MiG-25R to consider. Regards,
  18. Yes,, it is. I see the subtitle (where I wrote it was for the Kitty Hawk kit) is rather tiny and easy to miss. The images are not up on their web site and prices are not finalized yet. Regards,
  19. Some new upgrades from Barracuda Cast! Nose... Wheels... Exhaust... Prices and availability after the 2016 IPMS/USA Nationals. Regards,
  20. Larry, it was nothing nefarious, just working out how to include the nose which they did. It is far better to ask the company directly than assume online. Regards,
  21. Straight from Kitty Hawk, the F2H-2P nose will be in the box. Happy Father's Day (for those who celebrate it today),
  22. Now that I see it, I hope mine is as nice (even if I have to make it without a sharkmouth)! Regards,
×
×
  • Create New...