Jump to content

Aardvark

Members
  • Content Count

    2,145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Aardvark last won the day on September 22 2019

Aardvark had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,583 Excellent

1 Follower

About Aardvark

  • Rank
    Very Obsessed Member
  • Birthday September 30

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Jet fighter in 72 scale

Recent Profile Visitors

4,540 profile views
  1. Well, I know a whole company that has it stable! The VES was called. True, we say: "Stability, a sign - skill!" B.R. Serge
  2. This is most likely a problem of deformation of one of the halves, probably some sprue was pushed out of the mold too early. It was necessary to remove the inner profile using a template and make an inner plastic insert that would simply lift up one of the fuselage halves. B.R. Serge
  3. Most funny, design 1942-1945: modern design drone-kamikaze "Lancet-3": "Everything new is well forgotten old" B.R. Serge
  4. Hi, Dennis! As far as I know - not, but developments tend to migrate and sometimes the model expected from one firm comes out from another. This is rare, but it happens, so I will not be categorical in my statements. Sorry, without comments. I tell them the same thing! B.R. Serge
  5. "some damage caused to the moulds" & "someone who is not longer in a position to make such decisions" Are these events related to each other? Could the meeting of very respect shareholders , not seeing profit, simply hit "someone who is not longer in a position to make such decisions" with a moulds on Swift, as a result of which we have a "some damage caused to the moulds" and a broken "someone who is not longer in a position to make such decisions"! By the way, for my part, I did everything possible to
  6. I should be in her place! B.R. Serge P.S. What is the name of this cat breed?
  7. So, are You saying that J-20 is J-8B on steroids? Mighty steroid Dragon? Sensation hypothesis!!! B.w. I came across a no less sensational article here, where the author gives an unfounded hypothesis that the D-8 is based ..... drum roll .... on the Sukhoi T-5 !!!! As a demonstrative attempt to pull an owl onto the globe , even even a photo is given: http://alternathistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/27796_800.jpg http://alternathistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/28122_800.jpg http://alternathistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11
  8. I know one where not use RLM81 and RLM82: B.R. Serge
  9. No miracle for 72nd scale. B.R. Serge
  10. Is this three-blade propeller, on photo, also included in the Tu-128 Trumpeter kit? For Tu-128TP? Do not be upset about the ejection seats KT-1 from NeOmega, because the A-models Tu-128 also have problems with them. Ejection seats KT-1 from NeOmega also too big for A-model cockpit. This may be due to the fact that NeOmega ejection seats were originally made for the Tu-22M model and were part of its cockpit aftermarket detail set. B.R. Serge
  11. Two portraits (to each!) Anushavan Ovanesovich Mikoyan (Mikhail Iosifovich Gurevich portraits optional on additional request!) this comrade! But I don't think that the MiG-17PF will be, because they have poor Dragon repack ordinary MiG-17 in own catalog. Yak-38 maybe will be, but I'm not sure if it will be a Zvezda. In general, there was a hint that there will be two new items in 72nd scale. B.R. Serge
  12. Bf.109TL & Me.262 these are structurally different aircraft, while Bf.109TL is a project and Me.262 is its evolutionary development embodied in metal. In the case of the aircraft shown here, their projects were not embodied in real samples, so do I understand correctly that You are proposing to go not to conformity with real paper projects, but to conformity with a certain ephemeral fantasy that exists only in the heads of model manufacturers developers, and does this fantasy of modelers exist only because they were too lazy to collect and study documentation on these projects? Or
  13. I have B.V.211, B.V.212 & F.W. P.II....B.V.212 I build....and exchange on some as unbuild B.V.212 .. So I have a couple of pennies on these models: - B.V. 211 not bad but have problem with section fuselage where the rear of the engine ends and the tail boom begins; - B.V.212 have only problem with uncorrect view main wheel bay; - F.W. P.II - it's catastrophic model, because as I think this project have tail, fin and adapted wing as on FW-190D or Ta-152H, in addition, the nose section with canopy was most likely like Flitzer, engine nacell was probably closer to Me-262
  14. Different Shark-Mouths MiG-27 probably M or D, not K: https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_456243607%2Falbum368455190_254704325 https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_457248267%2Falbum368455190_254704325 https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_457248268%2Falbum368455190_254704325 https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_457248863%2Falbum368455190_254704325 https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_457248862%2Falbum368455190_254704325
  15. Sorry, but I am mainly interested in planes in the paint of the country of the manufacturer of this plane. Therefore, what was there in the Warsaw Pact I have no idea. However, before this topic , I had no idea that there are two different Su-17s ..... of course I did not, yeah! As I wrote, Kazakhstani MiG-27s as an interceptor: - in clear intercept role: https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_457248874%2Falbum368455190_254704325 https://m.vk.com/album368455190_254704325?z=photo368455190_457248879%2Fa
×
×
  • Create New...