Adam Maas

The right sidewall changes a lot between aircraft, depending on what gear is currently fitted (radios, oxygen, et al). If you look at cockpit photos of the real thing, there's a LOT of variation on the right hand side.

Brunswick Green is a green pigment invented by the Brunswick Brothers in 1795. It is often associated with older US Railroad passenger schemes, especially Heavyweight schemes on the Pennsylvania RR

Has Eduard ever gotten the cockpit colour correct on their pre-painted stuff? They've been consistently off for pretty much every set I've seen from them, regardless of subject. I've yet to see it which is one reason I avoid pre-painted stuff from them for anything other than black instrument panels.

Two Lightning airframes were used operationally by the RAF, although neither were Lightning 1's. Both were Droop Snoots, although the better documented one was a depot conversion by the RAF. 44-23517 was passed on to Air Commodore Alfred C H Sharp as a hack when he left 8th AF to be base commander at Connigsby. It was converted to a droop snoot configuration after a droop snoot P-38 was loaned to No 5 Group RAF for a month with some success as a master bomber lead. After the modifications, 44-23517 was coded DPA and used in that role until AC Sharp transferred to Northolt.

Got distracted with other stuff, but spent some time painting stores and got to glue on the ECM tip pods so I can add the slime light decals

That's probably what I'll end up doing. Locating two of the bits is the bigger issue, because of their prominent location on the inner wings. Photo references FTW there.

been puttering away here and there. Running into two bits that annoy me, the locations for some bits are not positive at all (cockpit sidewalls) and while there are diagrams for the holes you need to cut to add some J-15 specific bits, there's no locates in the plastic, no measurements in the diagram (apart from hole size) and most of the holes are square, not round. Got the sidewalls in with an assist from the cockpit tub for locating them. And then started on the outer wings while I waited for glue to dry

Working on the lower fuselage Gear bays come like this: Then you install walls and pipes to get this: Pretty slick overall and the fit is good. I also got started on prepping the intakes for paint.

Hermes and Hosho were the first two carriers laid down explicitly as carriers. Argus was a conversion like Langley. Furious was actually the first to complete construction as a carrier and Eagle was the first true capital ship conversion (it's really hard to call any of the Courageous class hulls capital ships) Hosho was never intended as an oiler, it was ordered as the lead of a 2-ship Seaplane Carrier class in 1918 under the 8-6 program (the other being intended to be named Shokaku, which was cancelled in 1922 after languishing in design hell for several years and was never laid down, the name getting recycled some years later), The design was originally inspired by HMS Campania but was changed to a two-deck carrier like HMS Furious after its first refit in mid-1918 then to a flush deck carrier like HMS Argus in April 1919 after reports on the issues with HMS Furious's deck setup were received from the RN. This is what was laid down and built. Hiryu is not a name the IJN would have assigned to an oiler in 1919 anyways. The class of oilers under construction at the time were all named for capes (the Notoro class) and all of them were completed as planned. The next class was the Kamoi class which was first laid down in 1921. There is a connection to Hosho however, as several of these oilers including both Notoro and Kamoi would be converted to seaplane tenders, taking the role that Hosho and Shokaku were originally authorized for.

Interesting choice of subject. As a note, Hermes was the first carrier laid down as such, but Hosho would actually be the first true carrier to commission, with a rather much shorter build time

So this will be the third Kinetic kit I've started, the previous two still languish on the shelf of doom. This is also the newest and best designed, but it's not one of their Gold kits (the previous two are the 1/72 F-16D Block 52+ and the first release of the F-5A with CF-5A markings) I started with the cockpit. It's very nicely detailed for a plastic pit, but the rear wall could have been better engineered. Just a butt joint with a small lip, no really positive interlock or location like a ZM or Tamiya kit would have. Note I'm aware this is an Su-33 pit and the real J-15 is different. Then the nose gear bay. Some nice detail and nicely laid out engineering, but the end caps are butt joints again with minimal location. Fit is rather good and unlike the rear cockpit wall, there's a lot of gluing area for the end caps.

I'm generally not one to do Soviet designs of any sort, nor do I normally build grey jets in operational schemes. Looking through the stash left me with 3 subjects tickling my fancy for this GB, the F-14 (I have the AMK D and Tamiya early A kits), the F-4 (Academy J and Tamiya B for seagoing examples) and the Kinetic J-15 Flying Shark (Chinese Su-33) which I bought on a whim while on sale at the LHS for Boxing Week. I have plans for both F-14's for later and I'm already building an F-4 right now (ZM F-4G), so the J-15 it is. I do dig the tail art on this one, which is a big part of why I bought a boring grey jet.

I'm in on this one, and I'm going to Jump the Shark. Namely I'm going to do a Flying Shark that uses Ski Jumps. The Kinetic J-15 will be my subject here.

Brewster Corsairs certainly flew off carriers a fair bit. That was part of the training regimen they were used for. JS716 for example was written off when the pilot ignored a cut signal and attempted a go around despite having the hook engaged. That was on USS Charger in Chesapeake bay. The question for that picture is was the shot taken while working up off the US, or operationally somewhere else. October 1944 suggests an operational airframe as Victorious was out east already and flying operationally and the frames are stills from 16mm film that's well sourced and the uniforms worn match the location. This most likely is a simple case of a specific airframe getting allocated against policy because the ship was leaving and it is what was available.

Offhand, my guess is a Canadian Forces boxing at release (I agree with the Big 2, a Snowbirds scheme that's good for a couple years and a special scheme option in the first boxing). Then probably a Snowbirds dedicated boxing (not all, but the highlights), a Special Scheme boxing and a RMAF boxing (the latter maybe in concert with somebody else)

Getting some decals down

7 Sopwith Camel 2F1a's, formerly of the RNAS, would fly the very first carrier strike ever recorded on 19 July 1918, off HMS Furious against airship facilities at Tondern.

More paintwork today, last of the main paintwork, I just need to do the upper wing fences and install them to be ready to clearcoat and start decals. Masked up: and peeled:

Not worth buying the old-tool kit now that they have a new tool F-16AM kit which is superior in all regards. Buy the K48100 instead of any of the old-tool F-16AM/MLU's

If you do them in Malaysian markings it won't be a what-if. The RMAF operated 20 CL-41G's in the light strike role (the CT-114 is the CL-41A)

I did a few more small fixes on the fuselage. Looks like all that's left is a bit of the upper colour to fix overspray and then I have to paint the bloody exhaust rings that Hasegawa so thankfully molded onto the fuselage section... Also did some work on the stabs, I'd shot the underside with the last of my MM Acryl FS36375, but thankfully the AK Real Color FS36375 is close enough that I could do the top leading edge with it and not have it look off. I then masked and shot the Italeri Blue Angel Blue over the tops, and looks like I have a bit of leakage on one stab to clean up.

Bringing this one back, now that my balsa fixation is done for the year. Original thread: https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235104088-172-hasegawa-ea-18g/ First up - more touch-up work: First off, a little of the topside colour (Italeri Blue Angels Blue)

Reshot the upper wings after a localized strip, glossed and now working on the decals. These Furball decals are really nice to work with

Went for Italeri Blue Angels Blue for the top colour. Seems a decent match And yeah, some issues to fix. The Italeri paint is a touch fragile and is not the best match to Stylnrez/One-Shot primer Taped up the first round of fixes And the result I'll fix the second round once it's had a chance to dry down Also primered and shot the gear and gear door insides. Using Vallejo Game Air White for this, it covers very well

It certainly is. They both have some issues. Overall, the Hasegawa is the better choice, it's issues are more easily rectified by either basic modelling skills (intake and upper wing joint gaps) or by aftermarket (exhausts, intakes, the cockpit) while the Revell's issues are generally either shape (the spine is just wrong and lacks one of the most characteristic aspects of the Rhino's shape in the oddly squared off spine) or poorly rendered detail on the lower section (less of an issue, but annoying). Where it does well is where aftermarket is available, notably the intakes and cockpit.