Jump to content

Nigel Bunker

Gold Member
  • Posts

    1,118
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Nigel Bunker

  1. Well it was the early 1960s, the Beatles hadn't had their first number one single yet and Harold Macmillan was Prime Minister.

     

    A trip to Woolworths in Reading (remember when Woolies stocked the entire Airfix range in their shops) and after much deliberating I came away with

     

    079d484a-f85f-41a0-a48f-52489e45b822.jpg

     

    plus the obligatory tube of

     

    369e32f2-1cea-4327-b397-437f76ea3145.jpg

     

    Does anybody else remember how it always took a tube of glue to complete a model?

     

    Happy days

    • Like 5
  2. During my enforced isolation I was exploring my stash in the loft, and to my surprise I came across two Revell 1/32 Mk 88 Lynx kits that I didn't remember I had bought. Just a simple question - can I male a Royal Navy Mk 8 from this kit?

     

    The only thing I have noticed to date is that I need to fit a folding tail which will mean scribing a break line and fitting a hinge mechanism.

     

    Any help much appreciated.

  3. There was an article in Scale Aircraft Modelling, September 1994 (Vol 16 Issue 11) called 'Improving the Italeri F-15" which dealt with the F-15E kit. PM me if you'd like a copy e-mailed.

     

    As Giorgio says, you'll need to check for a suitable weapons load, and you'll probably need some aftermarket decals.

  4. Italeri are not the first kit company not to use original sources. There was one Japanese company (name withheld) who copied at least one commercially available decal sheet. The man who designed the decal sheet told me knew this as they copied the mistake he had made.

     

    It is much better to start from scratch and work from original sources, but I suppose the designers think it is easier to copy others.

    • Like 1
  5. 19 hours ago, lesthegringo said:

    What else is distinctively different?

    Having converted a 1/32 Tamiya F-14A into an F-14D, from memory there was a new back end, new engine nozzles, new ejection seats, chin sensor and a myriad of smaller details. And also the DACO book on the F-14 as a reference.

     

    So I'd recommend starting with an F-14A kit and adding details such as flying surfaces as you require. One of my colleagues at the local modelling club has built three of the Tamiya F-14A kits and describes them as the best kit he has ever built.

  6. I seem to remember that 892 Squadron borrowed a 767 Squadron Phantom when they were doing work ups on Ark Royal in the early seventies after one of theirs went u/s. However, after spending the morning searching my Phantom books, I can find no written evidence of this. Perhaps my memory is failing me.

    • Thanks 1
  7. The Anigrand kit has serious faults - the wings are in the wrong place and the nose section is innacurate plus many othjer faults. There is a build here. I have been holding out for the Kinetic kit but if it's not going to appear then I won't be having a C-17 in my collection as I have no desire to spend over £150 on a kit and then having to take a razor saw to it

  8. 10 hours ago, Admiral Puff said:

    I seem to recall that we were promised an article on how that conversion was done (SAM? Scale Models?) but don't remember seeing one. Did it ever appear, or am I just having another brain fade?

    No, the modeller in question never got around to writing an article on how it was done.

    • Sad 1
×
×
  • Create New...