-
Content Count
495 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Ingo Degenhardt last won the day on December 2 2013
Ingo Degenhardt had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
411 ExcellentAbout Ingo Degenhardt
-
Rank
Established Member
- Birthday 04/28/1963
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
-
ICQ
0
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Bremen, Germany
-
Ingo Degenhardt started following 1/350 Battleship Yamato (Tamiya Premium kit), 1/72 Airfix Typhoon, Aichi D3A1 "Val", Pearl Harbor/Cyber-hobby 1/72 and 4 others
-
Very nicely built and I love the freehand camo job. What kind of airbrush did you use?
-
Very nice 'Val'! I had the same decal problem with my Fujimi kit when I tried to use PrintScale Decals - much too Orange. The kit decals were too old to use. I finally also painted almost everything except the Number (just like you did) and gave the Number (AI-210) a very carefully painted coat of thinned Hinomaru Red (Gunze) to get them a little bit more on the red side. This worked to a degree.
-
What colour for Israeli nat. insignia (Star)
Ingo Degenhardt replied to Ingo Degenhardt's topic in Cold War
Hi Andre, mine a for a camouflaged Mirage IIIC - will have a look at those FS colours. bedankt Ingo -
What colour for Israeli nat. insignia (Star)
Ingo Degenhardt replied to Ingo Degenhardt's topic in Cold War
Checked this one - looks about right. Thank you. ingo ps: The guest house looks nice. -
Does anyone know what FS/RAL colour the blue Star in the Israeli National Insignia is? I bought painting masks for those but they lack colour specifications. Ingo
-
Nice! And you're right - I built the A6M5 by Tamiya last year and it goes together just perfectly. The only small downside of these kits are the usual thick Tamiya decals.
-
Mirage IIICJ/Shahak #(1)52 /Op. Rimon20, 1970
Ingo Degenhardt replied to Ingo Degenhardt's topic in Cold War
Right - a side profile is no proof. I have heard or read that too - the digit number differences served to confuse about the real number of existing aircraft. Looks like this system is still working - only that it is us now who are confused. -
Mirage IIICJ/Shahak #(1)52 /Op. Rimon20, 1970
Ingo Degenhardt replied to Ingo Degenhardt's topic in Cold War
Thank you again for your extensive information (It seems I have the wrong books...and too few) So I might go with 778, Atar 9C and five kill markings - so far. As starting the kit is only in the near future, something might still come up. If not, I only have to decide between 152 and 778. Your answers were very helpful, Jure. Thanks for that. Ingo -
Mirage IIICJ/Shahak #(1)52 /Op. Rimon20, 1970
Ingo Degenhardt replied to Ingo Degenhardt's topic in Cold War
Hi Jure, thank you very much for your investigations. This is interesting because the eduard kit includes a marking option for '778' (Atar 9C) but with 101 Squadron in 1972 and already marked with eight kill markings (four above and four below the 'Mirage IIIC' stencil (which I think was standard, not 'CJ'). It is my impression that the IAF changed aircraft between Squadrons quite a lot. Would you be so nice to have a look at your photo again how many kill markings are on that aircraft? This might be an option because 119 Squadron markings are also included in the kit. -
F-18B 1/48 "Rough Raiders" VFA-125
Ingo Degenhardt replied to Night Owl's topic in Ready for Inspection - Aircraft
Looks excellent - I like the camouflage very much. How did you do the masking between camouflage colours? -
Hi, I have here eduards Shahak kit in 1/48 and would like to built the above aircraft that participated in Operation Rimon20 in 1970. No. 152 (52) of 101 Squadron is the only one I am sure about that it was among the Shahaks used in this Operation. I was only able to find a single picture in a book showing only the front part oft the aircraft with '52' painted on the nose wheel front cover - plus a side-view drawing that shows the aircraft as 152 on the vertical stabilizer. Questions: Does anybody know if '152' is correct and wether the aircraft had the Ata
-
1/350 Battleship Yamato (Tamiya Premium kit)
Ingo Degenhardt replied to TuanNA's topic in Ready for Inspection - Maritime
Very well done, I like it a lot. Must be an impressive beast on the shelf. Hope you got good dust protection for the display. -
That's what I will do.
-
Yes, I had to do several coats to achieve an even, glossy finish but I did not consider the coat to be too thick (no panel lines flooded ) Still, I had the same thought and apart from any strange reaction with the Alclad white primer (I think that very unlikely) it's the only explanation I can think of. No other choice than give it more time, I think.
-
Right - no other contents added. As said, it seemed to dry rather quickly - you could run a finger over it an hour later. But it seems to be soft beneath a kind of dry surface/skin.