Jump to content
This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

MilneBay

Members
  • Content Count

    819
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

239 Excellent

About MilneBay

  • Rank
    Obsessed Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

2,016 profile views
  1. I always paint the yellow first then mask it for the camo colours. Easier than using decals.
  2. Is that shadow or is the rudder painted a different colour?
  3. That's the danger of fake photos and the internet - there is no factual control.
  4. MilneBay

    Cierva W.9 PX 203

    As that was posted in 2012 it reminded me that in recent years we haven't had any postings from Diamant showing his father's models. I hope everything is OK.
  5. About 30 years ago I did a Nimrod 1 by taking two Matchbox Furys and using them to give me the added sections to the wingspan. I also scratch built the arrestor hook. etc.
  6. MilneBay

    Roundel blue

    Probably orthochrome film which was the film of choice for a lot of aviation photos.
  7. Been a couple at Hyperscale also.
  8. Personally I like Tamiya AS12 in the rattle can. Basically fool proof and once it's on it's virtually bullet proof.
  9. I've built both the Monogram and the Occidental kits. IMHO the Monogram captures the aircraft better because of the rivets. The real thing was not a smooth skinned flush fitted panelled affair. It had overlapping panels joints and lots of rivets.
  10. Well the Mk VI was a dud - it took the Mk VII to sort the problems of high altitude work out but that was a fairly minor application of the whole breed. From what I've read the Mk IX and the Mk XIV were the pick of the crop but with the Spitfire they were all pretty effective until advances in the opposition rendered a particular mark obsolescent. But that said the Mk I was a damned effective fighter in the Battle of Britain and the horribly ugly Vokes filter fitted MK Vs did sterling service despite that drag inducing nose job. After the Mk XIV came into service all the subsequent marks were rapidly overtaken by jets anyway so while they were in Spitfire terms fine aircraft they were in reality now behind the game. So it's all a bit relative. The Mk I was the pick in 1940, just as the Mk IX and Mk XIV were the pick in later years. My favourite appearance wise is the Mk IX but that has nothing to do with combat effectiveness.
  11. I've built the SM 81 and Fiat CR 32. The SM 81 requires a lot of filler and some of the locating places for wheel struts etc. are less than clear and in the wrong places. As others have mentioned the Warren bracing on the CR 32 is a nightmare if you don't take care and time. They turn our OK in the end but you need to be very careful.
  12. That is very impressive. Good work on the sails.
  13. Well if you have started and you are reasonably happy with the progress to date why not finish it. If you build it to a standard you are happy with then OK, and that frees up the other examples of the aircraft to do in other markings. If you aren't happy with the progress so far then toss it and keep the decals.
  14. A pink Hurricane is perfectly accurate because it was designed to attack this Nazi secret weapon -
  15. The reality is that if the law of a country restricts or bans public display of symbols or any other thing then if you reside in that country you either obey or take the consequences. I have a large collection of models. There are aircraft with swastikas both German and Finnish, red stars both Russian and from other communist countries and there is a Curtiss Jenny which has the US red star marking adopted by Pershing in 1916. There are British and Commonwealth roundels, US stars and bars, Japanese Hinomarus and all sorts of different national crosses, circles triangles and what have you. I understand that any one of these may be offensive to some people and equally the same marking may not - I build the models and give them the appropriate markings. But I am alive to the fact that the swastika on the tail of my Luftwaffe aircraft while just a historically correct insignia to me, would have a much more traumatic significance to a survivor of Auschwitz. That is the reality of political and national symbols. Just as a red star may have a traumatic meaning to a survivor of the Gulag, or the Hinomaru to a survivor of Changi or the Burma railroad. It's a complex and sometimes painful history we have and there is no escaping the effects that it has.
×
×
  • Create New...