Jump to content

johnd

Gold Member
  • Posts

    1,219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by johnd

  1. My local shop still has it so don't give up just yet.

     

    I just checked the tin, it has the same colour of lid as the old one, i.e. matched to Light Mediterranean Blue so don't disregard it on that score. The only difference I could find between old and new pots was on the sticky label on the bottom, the old one said A1701, the new one AA1701. I don't know if this is significant.

     

    John.

    • Thanks 1
  2. Yes, I believe at least one of the BMers petitioned Humbrol and they changed it. It was a year or two ago (I think it may be documented in the thread I linked to) so it should be readily available by now. I bought one about six months ago. Not all modellers found it to be good news though, as 157 was replaced with the new recipe rather than add it as a new number. Therefore, we lost Light Mediterranean Blue which I don't think is available elsewhere.

     

    John.

  3. I don't believe the resin nose is still available. It was by Heritage Aviation Models (aka Kits for Cash) but has now disappeared from their website. I had my eye on their Tempest metal undercarriage set and when that disappeared from the site I enquired by email: sadly, they'd not only discontinued them but melted them down. I fear the same fate befell the Battle nose.

     

    There was an article in one of the monthly mags on updating the kit and the author sorted out the wing chord by sandwiching a piece of plastic card between the two halves and building up the wing thickness with plastic and filler. 

     

    John.

    • Like 1
  4. I look upon this kit as a bit of a disappointment but not a total disaster. To play devil's advocate a little, my fairly decent supply of Spitfire spares will provide a propeller unit, wheels, oil cooler, exhaust stacks and canopy and therefore it should build up into a reasonable Vb. The only real problem is what to do about the upper wing cannon bulges. I'll probably stick to just one, though, unless the price is right. After all, the basic shape of fuselage and wings is sound.

     

    Regarding a Vc, there's no reason why Revell couldn't release one as the next in the line...

     

    John.

  5. I have this kit and it is a new tool, based on the recent Mk.IIa. Some of the problems of the Mk.II are still with us (odd wheels, awful canopies and incorrect oil cooler) but there aren't any strange square plates on the wing. The lower wing is a new part and has fewer ejection ports but still, I think, too many. The underwing cannon bulges are present. Additional areas of concern are the upper cannon bulges and the propeller unit which are too thin/too far back and odd respectively (both as above). 

     

    IMG_20180206_151912523_HDR

     

    IMG_20180206_152033115_HDR

     

    IMG_20180206_152210074_HDR

     

    A bonus is the two slipper tanks, so not all bad.

     

    John.

     

    PS Sorry about the quality of the pics, only my mobile to hand at the moment.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. The Defiant has been around a couple of years now in both standard and starter set form. Airfix have sold their production run of the original pressing (some to retailers such as Hannants). They are now producing a load more, maybe with different markings, maybe not. The plastic will be the same either way. 

     

    Just make sure you order 02069 (standard) or 55213 (starter set) and you'll be fine.

     

    John.

  7. 9 hours ago, Black Knight said:

    In short; take old tin lid, drill hole in tin lid, attach battery motor to lid, extend shaft and make fitting for stirring. Put tin lid onto paint tinlet, attach battery to motor, stir paint with no spray mess

    I remember that. Didn't it use a Tamiya motor from one of their motorised 1/35 tanks?

     

    John.

×
×
  • Create New...