Jump to content

Mycapt65

Members
  • Posts

    277
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mycapt65

  1. How could it be a retread of old ground if there's never been an 86A done before??? Most jets don't excite me. Jets without combat experience are less exciting. I don't think I've done a non combat plane since I was eight when I built an old Mongram Albatross and Cousteau's PBY on a seaplane binge. Different strokes for different folks. Be well Ron How could it be a retread of old ground if there's never been an 86A done before??? Most jets don't excite me. Jets without combat experience are less exciting. I don't think I've done a non combat plane since I was eight when I built an old Mongram Albatross and Cousteau's PBY on a seaplane binge. Different strokes for different folks. Be well Ron How could it be a retread of old ground if there's never been an 86A done before??? Most jets don't excite me. Jets without combat experience are less exciting. I don't think I've done a non combat plane since I was eight when I built an old Mongram Albatross and Cousteau's PBY on a seaplane binge. Different strokes for different folks. Be well Ron How could it be a retread of old ground if there's never been an 86A done before??? Most jets don't excite me. Jets without combat experience are less exciting. I don't think I've done a non combat plane since I was eight when I built an old Mongram Albatross and Cousteau's PBY on a seaplane binge. Different strokes for different folks. Be well Ron How could it be a retread of old ground if there's never been an 86A done before??? Most jets don't excite me. Jets without combat experience are less exciting. I don't think I've done a non combat plane since I was eight when I built an old Mongram Albatross and Cousteau's PBY on a seaplane binge. Different strokes for different folks. Be well Ron
  2. Thanks, that would fit my uncles service time from 72-74.
  3. Beautiful. It may have fought you all the way, but you won in grand style.
  4. Ok, at least this photo says differently. Fwiw to the dismay of all the environmentalist out there. Every carrier plane at that time left the deck with full fuel tanks even if it was for a short test flight. They were required to dump all but the necessary fuel before landing. The fire hazard of landing with full or or partly full tanks overcame the financial and fuel losses. Atomizing hundreds of gallons of jet fuel, essentially kerosene was common place to protect the ship's and crew's saftey. It still might be today. It just wouldn't be publicized today. In regards to your statement the RF in question might have flown with completely empty wing tanks until needed. Either way it's obvious at one time the Midway had a Marine RF-4 detachment. I had other pictures of them but I tossed them and unfortunately a bunch of others when I was a stupid teenager making room in my photo album for girlfriends and cars.
  5. I could be wrong but this is what I was told by my Uncle Jay who was an ordnance man on the Midway 72-74. You'd be hard pressed to find photos of a Vietnam era Navy Phantom with Sparrows on the front mountings. At least when the 600 gallon tanks were used. Which was the norm. I have no idea of what you're talking about regarding articulated arms and inner pylons. When I said inner pylons, I was referring to the inner wing pylons. Those had two side rails for AIM 9 Sidewinders on each pylon. Occasionally they'd fly with only one Sidewinder on each side when flying strike missions. The RF-4B is carrying wing tanks. They had an entirely different mission that required extra fuel. He also said that the Phantoms were gas guzzlers and they lost more Phantoms to running out of fuel than enemy fire.
  6. You'll only need two AIM-7 Sparrows. Vietnam era Bs usually only carried two sparrows on the rear launchers. They weren't terribly dependable and they didn't like lighting them up in front of the 600 gallon belly tank. A normal Migcap load out was, two Sparrows on the rear launchers, Four sidewinders on the inboard wing pylon rails, 600 gallon center tank and no wing tanks. The outer pylons were usually empty on Migcap missions. Strike Missions would carry similar defensive load out with the addition of bombs to all four wing pylons. The bombs and their arrangement varied. Usually there be TERs and MK82s hung on the inboard. Outboard pylons could have a single, TER or MER. Check your references.
  7. Beautiful. I love that scheme. Possibly because my uncle was on the Midway when that plane was flying missions.
  8. Looks Damn Good to me. NEVER APOLOGIZE for build like this. You're not responsible for the kit itself.
  9. Making slow progress but I think it's an improvement on the kit cowl to the left. Be well all.
  10. IMO I wouldn't get too hung up on getting perfect matches. Those paints varied from supplier to supplier. Then weathered poorly. That's why ANA 623 was reformulated in 1947. Leave the color spectra graph home and just use what looks right to you. I know it's hard. I suffer from ocd and have gotten into the deepest rabbit holes chasing exact colors only to find there's no exact answers. Enjoy your model. The corsair is my favorite airplane of all. Make it the way you want.
  11. I never knew the plane existed. It's a beautiful airplane and your kit came out great. I have some research to do now. Thank you Ron
  12. After reading this thread you couldn't pay me to watch another woke film from a Godless director trying to dislodge people's faith and discredit men that risked their lives to better humanity as best they knew at the time. Absolutely shameful. War is a horrible situation created by man alone. Other than giving people the strength to deal with it's atrocities God has nothing to do with it. Films like these need to be ignored. They dishonor the millions that gave their lives to make us a better world.
  13. Wow does that look great! I've had problems with the SAC stuff too. I'm not sure how they're still in business.
  14. I believe they were the pilot's angle references for ground attacks.
  15. A beautiful build of (to my eyes) one of the most beautiful jets ever built.
  16. Here's some images of my painfully slow progress on my Hobbyboss Cowl improvement. The Standard HB copy is the one in grey. You never realize how complicated it is to duplicate seemingly simple shapes. I got a long way to go but I needed to get It monochrome so I can better judge the shape. Be well all Ron
  17. The smoke rings scare me as well. But didn't someone make a mask set for them once? It's daunting but I think masks could be self made by many of the modelers here. I don't care enough about the subject to tackle them. Which I think is the point some are trying to make here. Only my opinion, but I think a Stuka family will out sell the Maachi family. Time will tell.
  18. Wait! Does this mean they're done with Mustang variants? I was hoping for some Allison variants.
  19. I'm not going to add to the inevitable never ending wish listing but I will say I'm disappointed they've abandoned the Corsair. I think the Stuka and Maachi would sell well. Neither particularly excite me. Between the two I might buy a Stuka. Honestly I could live without both in my collection.
  20. Your best is great. That looks awesome!
  21. I started kit bashing a Hasegawa F4U-5N and F4U-4 to make a F4U-4B. I managed to mangle several fuselages trying to mate portions of each and later rescribing a whole fuselage. I will still finish this mix as the wing has already been modified and dimensions are all worked out. I just need a break from scribing. I decided it might be easier in the interim to fix the Hobby Boss kit. The cowl ring has sharp corners that give it a blocky look. I started fixing it by sanding the corners down to almost transparency. That made a big improvement. Next was improving the size and shape of the carb intake. This is earmark of my favorite version so it was important to me to fix it. With actual measurements from an original aircraft I found there's not enough height in the HB cowl to add a properly size carb intake without deepening the cowl itself. I started by framing the intake opening with brass wire and flat stock. Then I set it in the cowling with Apoxy Scuplt. As soon as I'm done someone will release a beautiful new tool Dash 4 and you'll have me to thank. To be continued Ron
×
×
  • Create New...