Jump to content

Over The Ponder

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Over The Ponder's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/9)

7

Reputation

  1. Hi Jeff & Graham, Thanks so much for the responses. The film posits a (very!) alternate time line from 1945-47. With that said: 1. From what I recall from the film, the movie Yukikaze retains at least one of her 5" turrets (forward), but the gun barrels are shown cut off and plugged at the ends of the blast bags; I can't remember right now if the aft turret is still present*. All secondary and AA guns are removed. Not sure if all the various gun directors and other gunnery-related equipment remain, but I would assume not since she's supposed to be disarmed. On the other hand, I believe her torpedo launchers and their reloading equipment are still on deck, but are shown wrapped/sealed in canvas or something similar. I can't recall right now--need to check some movie stills--but I would assume all depth charge-related racks and launchers were removed because in the film she's carrying cable reels and a jerry-rigged crane on the fantail (the cable is part of the movie's plot whereby some ex-IJN boats combine to try to subdue the G-man...). Lastly, she does seem to still have some of her radar arrays, but I need to check that, too. Basically, I need to do a more detailed review of the movie stills to nail down the details that are obviously missing or not shown clearly. Will also need to source some decals or stencils to put her name on the hull sides--the movie has that in English, which I guess makes sense for an immediate post-war boat. 2. Jeff, I believe one of the other ex-IJN "co-stars", the Yuukaze (of the 1920s Minekaze class), is in fact depicted as stripped of her turrets, etc. 3. *The Tamiya 1/350 Yukikaze kit has her after her final wartime refit, with the extra AA suits added and one 5" turret removed. I'll assume that's the ship the film depicts until I see some evidence to the contrary. What I'm interested in building is a Yukikaze model that depicts the CGI-created boat in the film, with added details from the real thing, because there are certainly details that are not shown clearly (or at all) in the film because they didn't need to be--the difference between a movie boat and a model. Graham, I would love to see some of the pictures/drawings you have. Can you see my email address in my profile so that we can communicate off the site? Pls drop me a line if you can. Thanks again for your comments and advice. Best, Chris
  2. Hi All, Something a little different: I'm thinking of building a model of the immediate post-war IJN Yukikaze as she "co-starred" in the recent "Godzilla Minus One" movie, based on the Tamiya 1/350 kit. I can find a decent selection of movie stills on-line, but I'd like to supplement them with post-war pictures of the real ship if such pictures exist and are readily accessible. I'd appreciate learning what, if any, books might be available, or what web sites might have such images. Thanks for all your help. Chris C (PS: And FWIW, the movie is quite well-done, and well-worth seeking out. See it on the big screen if you can, not at home. And the color version, not the B/W.)
  3. Tommy Thompson, who owns/manages the 'tailspintopics' blog linked to above, has also written an excellent book focused on the F4H-1 called "Birth Of A Legend" (ISBN 978-0-9993884-5-7). It's available from him via his blog. It has hundreds of pix and drawings of the F4H-1. Fascinating history and a great read. CC
  4. Good stuff! Thanks everyone for the comments and links. Very helpful--lots to dig into. I'm surprised that some publisher hasn't put together a compilation-style book (or ebook) on this, showing repairs by each major air force. Maybe some day. Regards, Chris
  5. Hi All, Are there any websites or other on-line sources that have pictures that show what the minor repairs to battle-damaged RAF aircraft looked like? In particular I'm looking for post-repair Spitfires and other fighters, but, really, pictures of any a/c would be helpful. I'd like to have a good idea what the various patches and their means of attachment looked like. Thanks for all your help. Chris
  6. Dana, David, Sorry for the radio silence... Thanks so much for the answers and information. Greatly appreciated. I will forget about puttying the two Corsairs I have in mind. Best, Chris
  7. Hi All, I may be totally mis-remembering this, but I seem to recall reading a long time ago that F4U Corsairs had puttied leading wing edges. I'd appreciate knowing if this is true, or if I'm mistaken. And if it is true, did all models from all mfrs have this, or was it limited to certain models and/or factories? Many thanks for your help Chris
  8. Hi Tom, "Building The P-51 Mustang" by Michael O'Leary (ISBN 978-1-58007-190-1; Specialty Press 2010) has > 350 pictures of Mustangs under construction, and a detailed discussion of how the plane was designed and then built. This includes changes to the a/c and component parts over time, often backed up with a photo or two. It runs from the NA-73X through the P-51H. It also has an appendix that i) summarizes all P-51 variants and notes the significant changes between them; ii) shows NAA's Mustang model designations and related military serial numbers; iii) has a summary of USAAF and RAF serial numbers by type; and iv) has a summary of the various Mustang construction contracts by model type. It also has a brief bibliography re books abt the Mustang. I think it's a pretty good basic reference--I bought it mainly for the excellent b/w photos--and recommend you check it out when you can: it might have a lot of what you're looking for. Best, Chris
  9. BB, Suggest you contact John Miller at Model Paint Solutions (modelpainstsol.com). Among other things, MPS is a Mission Model Paint dealer, and John has written extensively about the best ways to use/apply MM paints (and other brands, too). The MPS website and newsletters also have a tremendous amount of information re painting, finishes, and airbrushing. Definitely worth checking out. Regards, Christopher Child
  10. Hi All, Thanks for the replies. Much to think about. I will try the wire-inside-tubing fix in the next few days--that may be the simplest solution for now. That's essentially a scaled-down version of what is sometimes done in the 1/1 scale world. I will also experiment with using regular wire. I certainly have enough of it. I'm concerned about my ability to consistently drill straight and true holes, but I guess I'll have to keep practicing. It's always harder than it looks, isn't it? Lastly, I will take a look at the fly tying tubing. I used to tie my own flies, but I can't recall ever seeing/using thin tubing for that, but there are so many fly patterns out there that I'm not surprised that I may have missed something. In my experience you can use just about any little bit of anything as part of a fly! Thanks again for your suggestions. Chris
  11. Hi All, I've started building a couple of Tamiya 1/12 bikes as a change of pace. I've noticed that the black tubing Tamiya supplies to represent cabling/tubing has a tendency to develop collapsed tube walls and kinks when it's bent beyond a gentle curve. I can sometimes use my tweezers to gently squeeze the tubing to fix these problems, but sometimes that won't work. I'm pretty sure I've installed the tubing correctly; I also straightened the tubing before I used it by hanging it up for a few days with light weights on each end. I'd appreciate knowing if any of you have found a simple satisfactory workaround to this problem. For example, is there better quality tubing available that doesn't behave the way Tamiya's does? Thanks for all your help. Chris Child
  12. Hi All, I'd appreciate any comments/advice about your experiences with Tamiya Mark Fit and Mark Fit Strong decal setting solutions. Thanks. Chris C
  13. Hi All, A question: from a modeller's point-of-view are there any obvious physical differences between a RAF Mustang IV and the comparable USAAF P-51 model that one needs to be aware of? If yes, has Eduard identified these changes and included the necessary parts and instructions in the new Mustang IV kit? Thanks. Christopher Child
  14. For the Yak fighters, I suggest you take a look at "Yakovlev Fighters of World War Two" by Gordon, Komissarov, & Komissarov, Hikoki Publications, 2015 (ISBN 9 781902 109466). Hundreds of photos, drawings, color art work, and best of all, a detailed development history for each of the types, including some pretty obscure experimental models. Really good stuff on a very important family of a/c. Best, Chris
×
×
  • Create New...