Jump to content

Six97s

Members
  • Posts

    737
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Six97s

  1. 13 hours ago, johnlambert said:

    I managed to be in the right place at the right time, going for a walk this morning.

     

    y4mQPPl-Q7XAuSGAstAFAKw6mke81HM_LeIFGOQ0

    The early to mid 1960s Ford Galaxies are some of my favourite American saloons, mainly because of the big, 7-litre cars that did so well in saloon racing.  This is a 1963 model and I had enough time to ask the owner, who told me that it's a 289.  It certainly made all the right V8 noises even if it doesn't have the ultimate go of a big-block car.

     

    That's a '64.  :)

     

  2. On 13/06/2022 at 22:50, dnl42 said:

    Yet a close crop of another photo suggests the axle is indeed attached to the bottom of the radiator assembly by some manner of pivoting mount.

     

     

    This is a photo I found of someone's rebuild of a diecast model, but it shows how the front axle mount is bolted to the front of the engine block.  The rad sits on top of that.

     

    https://images12.fotki.com/v1226/photos/7/777399/3975017/DSCF9389sharp-vi.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. 8 hours ago, bentwaters81tfw said:

    There is a stock version available, I have one. I intend to make a convertible out of it. My friend had one, and I collected it and drove it home across London in the rush hour 50 years ago. Great fun.

     

    Depending on how nit-picky you are, there are a couple of potential problems with that:  the Revell kit is a basic Custom 300, which wasn't offered as a convertible.  Also, being a sedan, it has a higher roofline and a taller windscreen than the Fairlane 500 hardtops and convertibles.  There are also some issues with the Revell body around the wheel arches where the old AMT '57 is more accurate...  All things considered, the venerable AMT '57 Fairlane would be a better starting point  for a convertible.

     

    Nice build  OP.   I have a stock one in the stash (and three AMTs 😶), will get to them one day.

  4. 28 minutes ago, PlaStix said:

     

    Unfortunately, work and family commitments haven't left me much spare time, so I've had to park this one for later. 😕

    • Like 1
    • Sad 2
  5. 4 hours ago, vppelt68 said:

    The goodies count in that '69 Roadrunner box is amazing, btw, some of the best HEMI parts available way back then. M/T valve covers etc.

     

     

    Funny you should mention those.  I have two '69 Road Runners, but one has the M/Ts and the other has stock* valve covers.  Same with the two '64 Dodges: one came with M/Ts, the other with the stock ones. 

     

    *IIRC the "stock" ones in the Road Runner are actually the early '64 - '65 Race Hemi shape, but I'll have to check...

    • Like 1
  6. One from yesterday on the A444, a "patina" (ick) Beetle, L-reg IIRC.  Lowered with polished Fuchs style wheels, but somewhat let down by the Herbie decor - yes, racing stripes and 53 roundels.   If the rust was faked, even worse 🧐.

    • Like 2
  7. 4 hours ago, richellis said:

    It’s nothing to do with that’s, they put the small box in to weigh the back down as a solo tractor unit bounces lots, especially older lorries with short wheelbases and steel sprung suspension.

    It make a massive difference with traction and comfort.

     

    That makes sense. 

  8. Nice paint.  🙂  I wouldn't flat a metallic - it will never look even.  No problems using the standard Halfords clear over Tamiya paint in my experience.  I prefer their petrol resistant lacquer over Halfords base coats, because it seems to dry harder, but I haven't tried that on a Tamiya base yet.

    • Thanks 1
  9. Yes please.  🙂

     

    Edit - might as well add a quote of my own...   "That Plymouth had a Hemi with a TorqueFlite.  I believe we sawed the guy off even if we did lose 200"

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...