Jump to content

Anatol Pigwa

Members
  • Posts

    468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Anatol Pigwa

  1. On 17/01/2022 at 01:11, Robertone139 said:

    Plenty of new F-4 Phantoms around, both in 72 and 48 scale.

    - Especially late F-4Es and F-4Fs with slatted wings ;)

     

    On 17/01/2022 at 01:11, Robertone139 said:

    Mirage 2000? 1/72 Modelsvit and 1/48 Kinetic.

    Particularly 2000Ds and Ns in 1/72 scale (it is either the old Heller or the Revell/Italri which both are incorrect vor diffrent reasons.

    On 17/01/2022 at 01:11, Robertone139 said:

    F-111 yes, that a strident note.

    ?

  2. Good Morning and welcome to the first day of the GB.

     

    first I'd like to thank you all for participating. in this STGB, not only with your builds but also your valuable input and support.

     

    @gingerbob published already GBs statistics, I have made some graphs for your viewing pleasure:

     

    51807331158_5ff0552b64_m.jpg 

    Breakdown by version- as you can see the A/C/E/F versions are the majority as expected and their numbers are fairly evenly matched.

     

    51806261217_3e5dc55ed4_m.jpg

    Breakdown by scale and manufacturer: There is a strong preference for Hasegawa and Academy in 1/72 (unsurprisingly since they are regarded as the go to versions for the Hornet in 1/72) in 1/48 we have a lot more variety, with Meng and Hasegawa leading the pack)  

     

    51807577844_522d51d01d_m.jpg

     

    Versions by manufacturer: - Hasegawa and Academy provide the biggest variety in this STGB, While Meng is the benchmark for the F/A-18F in 1/48th   

     

    51807945480_9f0c4ecc72_m.jpg

    Breakdown by operator: USN 1st, RAAF 2nd, RCAF 3rd. This is not surprising. What is surprising, that the Swiss and Spanish get more attention than the USMC (yet?) 

     

     

    51807577829_ded7fcde42_m.jpg

    Breakdown by Squadron: The Jolly Rogers are an absolute favourite with five builds There seems to be an error in this graph though as I am pretty sure we have 2 Blue Angels entries) .

     

    I hope to update the statistics with more data, like the Livery (Line bird, Special scheme) and Scheme (Grey, standard Camo, Digital Camo, Tiger Meet, CAG Bird).

     

    A question to the pros here - how do I efficently export Graphs from Excel as images in a decent size and quality? I noticed that the ones I placed here are a little bit small...

    • Like 3
  3. The irony of this proposal is that the one country which should be there due to the literal use of the word "land" in it's language, won't be elegible as you are considering only english names of the counties. Which country, you ask? well:

     

    Deutschland

     

    obviously. (Germany for those not familiar with the german language).

    • Like 5
    • Haha 3
  4. 28 minutes ago, Adam Maas said:


    That's the Night Attack D model with the ATARS fitted, the ATARS is the Advanced Tactical Airborne Reconnaissance System and the D models the USMC had fitted for it were the replacement for the RF-4.

    No idea where Italeri got the RF-18 designation from.

    Note Night Attack itself indicates nothing about the F/A-18D other than being a USMC operated aircraft. If fitted for ATARS, they are F/A-18D (RC)'s officially. ATARS is the combination of pods and certain equipment fitted to the nose, the latter being a permanent installation.
     

     

    This is where the Hornet designations get interesting: 

     

    Let's start at looking at Wikipedia (sorry I have no better sources at this time):

     

    F-18(R)

    This was a proposed reconnaissance version of the F/A-18A. It included a sensor package that replaced the 20 mm cannon. The first of two prototypes flew in August 1984. Small numbers were produced.[124]

    RF-18D

    Proposed two-seat reconnaissance version for the US Marine Corps in the mid-1980s. It was to carry a radar reconnaissance pod. The system was canceled after it was unfunded in 1988. This ability was later realized on the F/A-18D(RC).[124]

     

     

     

    The F/A-18D(RC) is a two-seater as per the D designation, while the Italeri Kit shows an A (single seater) and should probably be the F-18(R) kit designation RF-18A

     

    However Testors kitted the RF-18D Two Seater which is probably the F/A-18D(RC) you are reffering to.  

     

  5. 1 hour ago, Adam Maas said:

    Out of curiosity, what hasn't we seen yet?

    In terms of operators:

    Kuwait (Legacy and Super, although I doubt decals exist for the Supers which only started delivery a few months ago)
    Malaysia (D)
    NASA (regular F/A-18's plus the F-18 HARV & X-53)

    In terms of variants, I think we're just missing the YF-17 Cobra and the F/A-18D 'Night Attack' ATARS operated by the USMC, as well as the HARV and X-53 for NASA.

     

    Was there not also the rather obscure Photo Recon version of the legacy Hornet kitted by Italeri as RF-18?

     

     

  6. That is quite a challange you brought uopon you. then again never stop aonyone from doing an experiment, he might do something wonderful. THe biggets Challenge with the OSL technique is, that usually with dioramas and figures, you can place the "light source" within the scene, This is rather difficult with an aircraft displayed on a shelf, but maybe if you use a "spot"-light to guide the eye this will be enough. 

    • Thanks 1
  7. Welcome to your first GB. Though you are so proficient, you put many a seasoned veteran of those GBs to shame. I have to say, that I actually believe the F/A-18s landing gear looks terrible and therefore it looks so much better in flight (there are some planes though: the Mirage F1 or the SEPECAT Jaguar where the Landing gear has just to come out IMO) . 

     

    Gerat to see a trainer version as well. This makes this build quite unique. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...