Jump to content

Tokyo Raider

Members
  • Posts

    930
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Tokyo Raider

  1. 1 hour ago, Matt B said:

    The left wingtip is out of view, but you can clearly make out the pitot tube on the right wing of Flak Bait in this photo.  The plane in the background is a G-5, so it lacks a pitot tube in the right wing.

     

    spacer.png

    Thanks Matt...  yes i will do FB with its appearance at the end with 200 missions.  Thanks for your help on pitot tubes... 

    • Like 1
  2. My only confusion with the kit is the pitot tubes.  These are molded part of wing and instructions show cutting them off and not gluing them back.

     

    Is there someone who knows if the B26B had a left and right pitot tube on the wings?  I am looking at photos and old monogram kit of flak bait has you add the pitot tubes.

     

    Photos have most with pitot tubes, but some Marauders dont have them!  Im building flak bait, with AM decals...  thanks in advance for help!

  3. 6 hours ago, Mu17 said:

    A good example is the recent He162 variants - the two seater bears no resemblence to the real thing. 

    Paul

    I agree Paul...  I really want to separate the postwar fantasy from real designs. 

     

    What upsets me is when model companies (the offending kit wont be mentioned, but came out in 1990s) simply stick on forward swept wings on a HE162 where the conventional wings attach and call it a version of Volkjager!  They kitted this crap!  The landing gear are in wrong place and it would never balance!

     

    I have a resin conversion for the FSW He162 that has you move the wing root aft to the design position so the aircraft matches the real design and balances.

     

    I watch for these things because the 'cartoon' concepts usually violate aircraft design norms.

    • Like 1
  4. 8 hours ago, Mu17 said:

    At the time I don't think area rule was understood.

     

    No...  not to the extent of later work, but the benefits could be measured in a wind tunnel...  Wolfgang Haack defined this curve and proportion for minimum wave drag in 1941.  So the Germans were on it.

     

    Interestingly, the shape of the V-2 body seems to follow the optimum min wave drag shape...  so that design feature was contemplated...

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...