Enzo Matrix

nodnodnod I know that feeling!

You're gonna love it!

And I bet you want 'em now, dontcha? To be honest, I think a multiversion Hart kit would be a good long term investment. However, I think it's more likely in 1/48. And yes, I'd like it now, please!

Not only that, but it's the emails you get from them. I donate to three charities every month and I believe it's a generous amount. Nevertheless, every couple of weeks I get emails from them asking for more. Every time there is disaster somewhere in the world, I get another slew of emails asking me to donate more. The tone of some of these emails can be borderline offensive. There's a good chance that thousands of small orphans might be dying every week simply because I won't double my donation.

EggZACKerly! Armed aircraft ALWAYS have signs on them. Protocols are in place to ensure that no maintenance is carried out on them until they have been disarmed and downloaded. Then, there are the engineering controls that ensure that a firing circuit cannot be made if there is weight on the wheels. After that, we have the Master Armament Safety Brake which is always in place when an potentially armed aircraft is on the deck - whether or not that aircraft is scheduled to be armed. There are numerous safety layers which would have to be actively bypassed for this sort of incident to occur. My experience with operating with the Belgian armed forces is that they are incredibly professional. I can't see this occurring as a simple mistake.

I'm currently building this kit - and throughly enjoying it! It's a typical Sword kit, so it's not going to simply fall together if you shake the box. The application of a modicum amount of modelling skills is required. But it does seem to be turning into an excellent representation of the original,

I agree! @TonyTiger66

The RAF Phantom that negligently shot down a Jaguar in 1982 gained a kill marking quite quickly. and then lost it again just as quickly...

I agree with VP. The forum software doesn't allow that sort of control over the polls. However, I believe that it is not too much of an issue. What I am about to say is an opinion, based on anecdotal evidence. I have no hard data to back up my assertions. There is a hard core (corps even...) of GB enthusiasts. These people enter GB after GB after GB. However, this hard core seems to be a very small percentage of the total number of members who post reguarly on BM. In turn, that number is also a minor percentage of the total number of BM members. Given the number of people who vote in annual polls, I don't believe that there is a large proportion of people voting with no intention of taking part.

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/f-16-destroyed-on-airstrip-after-man-accidentally-triggers-vulcan-cannon-while-working-on-fighter-jet-nearby/ar-BBOprX1?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=HPCDHP An F-16 fighter jet exploded into flames on a Belgian airstrip after a maintenance worker accidentally pulled the trigger of a Vulcan cannon while working on another plane parked nearby, according to local reports. Don't these things have a WOW switch? That's a rhetorical question, by the way...

Anyone posting on Britmnodeller is already a long way down that slippery slope!

It reminds me somewhat of the artwork from some of the old Commando books.

There's always the forthcoming KUTA GB.

No one could possibly forget them...!

I've just heard "Ernie (The Fastest Milkman In The West)" by Benny Hill on the radio. I knew all the words off by heart. Why can I perfectly recall the words from a song from 47 years ago, but I can't remember where I put my car keys?!?!?!?!