Jump to content

king of men

Members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

26 Good

About king of men

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Washington state USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Honest with ourselves? Not in this hobby. Come look at my model stash for confirmation...
  2. The source I use for Xtracolours is, I believe, Kitlinx in Utah. They at least make an effort to reorder stock periodically.
  3. Wouldn't mind a stretched RAF variant. There's no easy way to get there with existing 1:72 kits without major surgery.
  4. And that is the biggest problem I have had with the project. I've figured out how to do (or ignore) most of the conversion requirements, but that canopy seems very different to my admittedly non-engineer eye. If only someone would make a prototype conversion with a new canopy. I mean, I'd even take a vac one - I guess it would have to be - even though I have a historic loathing of superglue.
  5. You know, I've never understood why non-modellers refer to us as "nutters".
  6. Ah well, it's not the stats, it's the fun you have while building them, right? At least that's what I tell myself...
  7. Don't want to be that guy, but is there a plastic part alternative for the cowl flaps? Yes, I know photoetch is more to scale but I'm no fan of the medium (well, of superglue to be honest). Not that it matters. I'm a fan of the Lysander and will definitely be picking one up once available.
  8. Two wondrous 1:72 experimentals collections! I've done a few myself (I'll try posting some photos as I get the display cases moved from the garage to the lower story). I shudder to think what you will face in terms of dust accumulation, however. The glass case in the second collection is very similar to one I just bought a couple months back. So far it has done a fine job of keeping things un-dusty. Display storage has been quite an issue for me. Well, with 500+ completed models since 1985 you might expect that....
  9. Detail inaccuracy is not a big point for me, but unbuildability certainly is. That MPM kit was just a mess as far as that goes.
  10. In 1:72 we are better served for fabric wing Hurricanes with no lower strake. My sticking point has always been the canopy. How are those of you considering a prototype planning to modify a production canopy to the earlier configuration? Sand off the canopy frames, polish, and then mask with the larger panels? I'm a wee bit skeptical I can pull that off without making it rather obvious, but I could be convinced. Any other possibilities?
  11. I'd certainly be up for a Battle. The MPM one just didn't cut it for me; overengineered and the fit was pretty bad.
  12. Indeed. And one of the groans would be coming from me...
×
×
  • Create New...