Jump to content

Mick Drover

Members
  • Posts

    694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Mick Drover last won the day on September 2 2013

Mick Drover had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Brisbane, Australia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Mick Drover's Achievements

Obsessed Member

Obsessed Member (4/9)

2.1k

Reputation

  1. Thanks Michael. I think I'm going to go with the 12x 500 lber split between MER's on the inboard station based on one of the photos that Jari provided in his initial answer. I can see Sparrows in the aft wells so that supports your comment. The strike camera sounds like an interesting addition to the loadout too. I'll track on down. Thanks for the great information. MD
  2. I've read about the rear cockpit mounted tracker that the WSO used. I'm comitted to the 366th unit as it's what the Furball sheet covers. The use of LGB's is certainly an interesting subject for an F-4. Thanks for the heads up Jari.
  3. Jari...that's a treasure trove of just what I need! There's a photo of an LF coded jet #228 with the Boars head on the intake side that is loaded appropriately, same squadron too. I can see a CL tank, AIM-7E in the rear bays, empty wing tank pylons and 500lbsers on MERs on each of the inner wing pylons. That'll be it! Thanks to everyone else for the helpful information, no doubt others will find it useful too. Thanks heaps, Michael
  4. Thanks for that info @e8n2 Dave, it's very helpful. The aircraft I'm doing was based at Da Nang so incursions to the north no doubt would have been regular. It sounds like the mix A2A/A2G option sounds like the version to go with. The timeframe is 1971 and based on what I've read the AIM-4D had been and gone and the pylons they were carried on were rewired to carry the sidewinder so it'll be If it was a partial load perhaps two Sparrows and two Sidewinders along with the 12 500 lbers....or would that be too much to carry?🧐🧐🧐🧐 I've not read anything about ECM pods being carried by them at this stage so I'll leave that one off. Thanks for the info.
  5. Hi all. I'm glad I've asked this early as I've only just made a start the 1/48 Academy F-4C Phantom with the necessary changes to make it an F-4D. It'd be dressed in Furball decals as a 366 The 390th/366th TFS TFW had the nickname of "The Gunfighters" due to their success with the use of the SUU-23 gun pod in air-to-air operations. With that in mind I was thinking of two options for a loadout. The first one is an A2A loadout as per the following. (Keep in mind that this will be a wheels up kit and suitably posed in flight to display the ordnance). Stn 1: 370 Gal Tank Stn 2: AIM-9B Sidewinder x2 Stn 3: AIM-7E Sparrow Stn 4: AIM-7E Sparrow Stn 5: SUU-23 Gun Pod Stn 6: AIM-7E Sparrow Stn 7: AIM-7E Sparrow Stn 8: AIM-9B Sidewinder x2 Stn 9: 370 Gal Tank The only problem with it is that it's a fairly ubiquitous loadout for A2A Phantoms in Vietnam. My second and preferential loadout is for an A2G sortie with the following. Stn 1: 370 Gal Tank Stn 2: TER with 3x Mk.82 500lb Stn 3: empty Stn 4: empty Stn 5: MER with 3x Mk.82 500lb with fuse extenders, 3x Mk.82 mechanical fuse Stn 6: empty Stn 7: empty Stn 8: TER with 3x Mk.82 500lb Stn 9: 370 Gal Tank My question is would this be an accurate or common loadout? I've found a profile (I know, but it's based on a particular day) of a jet from the same squadron and it's carrying an MER on the centreline with the same configuration of 500lbers as I mentioned on stn 5 but with Sidewinders and Sparrows in absence of the 500 lbers on the wing stations. I don't know the MTOW data for the Phantom but would a mix of A2A and A2G also be an option? And if so, what would it look like? Thanks for the help. Michael
  6. Nice work Alex. Any tips on how you painted the nice and neat frangible covers on the rocket pods? Well done. Mick
  7. Great result Calum. That scheme is a bucket list item for me. All the best for the season too. Mick
  8. Thats look fantastic Mike. For a kit that has the reputation of needing some extra care, your elbow grease has certainly paid off. It looks great in the SAF markings. Mick
  9. Oooh, very nice @CJP. I shudder at the thought of vac kits but you've nailed this one. Great to see it RAN markings too. Cheers, Mick
  10. That's a great result on a subject not often seen. With some work the Hasegawa kits can turn out nicely. Looks like you've managed to do it. Well done. Mick
  11. That is definitely hi-viz! Well done on mixing the orange colour. I've had to do mix an orange on a different subject and it was a hit and miss affair. Great stuff. Mick
  12. That's a great result Alex considering the quality of the kit. It's nice to see some vibrant colours on it too. Mick
  13. Great work @mathy I've recently seen that this kit has been released. I'll wait for it to appear in the local stores here in Oz. Besides your observation about the stores, were there any issues with fit etc that you could share? Again, it's really nice. Cheers, Mick
×
×
  • Create New...