Jump to content
This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

Air Hockey Propellers

Members
  • Content Count

    332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Air Hockey Propellers

  1. Did someone mention Vietnam? I just voted. If it's the Navy, it's the Navy in Vietnam! Believe it or not, I was just about to start a topic asking about the most representative US Navy ships to fight in Vietnam and their best scale models. I searched "vietnam" and "ship" and found this post. Should I start such post anyway? So far I can only find Tamiya's 1/350 carrier, New Jersey, and 1/35 PBR. As you can see, I'm making a Vietnam collection and once I finish all those aircraft, I will build the M48, the M113 and a ship. Other Vietnam models I will build over the years unhurriedly. And yes, I know, the A-7 and F-5 in my collection are not Vietnam examples but they're close enough.
  2. Thanks for the tip. It's amazing how just a slightly softer curve can make such a difference to the discerning eye. I also liked the rivets on the fuselage instead of the recessed panel lines. Too bad Airfix doesn't produce them anymore, but better getting one second hand than somehow modifying a Fujimi until it looks right. Hello, pardon my ignorance but what's the dog house? Thanks to you both for your replies.
  3. Hello everyone, Between Italeri's and Fujimi's 1/72 offerings, I rather Fujimi because the clear parts are far more realistic. However, I have a problem with the upper sides of the fuselage since they seem to be too boxy on the model. I'm not imagining this, right? I mean, has anybody ever noticed this before? If so, has anybody attempted to make modifications? I have seen modelers obsess over far less noticeable fuselage shape errors on other aircraft so I guess my question is not too farfetched. Images taken from the internet.
  4. It should be a nice project to build a 1/72 YS-11. It just looks so classic. And yes, they were both in separate museums in Aichi, Japan. I already sent a message to the walkaround moderator to see if they can be included in the section. Too bad I didn't take more pics, though.
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMC_YS-11
  6. The real example was taken in the Kakamigahara museum and the scale model pics at the Aichi museum of flight.
  7. 10 over 10 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/b007xvrp Skip to 18:00
  8. Hello there, I've just bought the Hasegawa 1/72 Huey and I would like to know what you mean by the inaccurate front end...
  9. https://www.italeri.com/uploads/news/m33hofTevksUE0AvH2udA168GpOPUL98Eq0JrDo6.pdf This one? Where do you get your info from?
  10. One sure way from telling an M from an MR is the lerx pylon that goes all the way to the top of the wing on the MR version (there must sure be a technical name for that). So is it me or are the right parts are missing in this kit. Talking about parts B4 and B17...
  11. Despite what many have said in this forum topic, I'd say that the Fujimi kit is the best in 1/72 because: 1) it represents the intake and exhaust parts so you can see the intake blades. You instil the blades for the exhaust but as in the real thing, you won't be able to see them after the kit's finished. 2) The canopy frames are not those ultra-thick-in-real-life types that Italeri is famous for. 3) it comes with slats which are harder to replicate than flaps if you want to take it to that level 4) It comes with two detailed MERS and 12 Mk. 82s 5) Very subtle recessed panel lines 6) Pilot figures with separately molded arms, and heads with oxygen masks with tubes. 7) Good cockpit detail, as in surface differences (how was it you called those?) on the instrument panel 8) Crisp landing gear 9) Decent Fujimi quality decals Cons... Some say it's not accurate but the finished model looks absolutely fantastic. No flaps down option but they are hardly ever parked that way. No folding wings No stairs for dioramas but then again... And finally, the absolute worst thing about this kit (drum roll) IT'S DISCONTINUED. We should make an "owner of great but discontinued models club". I've never done a nose job on a plane and I wouldn't recommend one either. And sometime this year, I'll buy Hasegawa's offering to see for myself just how bad it is. It's the only thing that's available until the 1/72 Trumpeter offering shows up for good.
  12. Hello Jonathan, ...eight years ago... well, do you have any pics of these experimental camouflage? I once saw one, just one, Skyhawk with and olive drab upper side like that used on the Huey.
  13. http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2804557302 It's a Chinese website. Careful you catch a virus.
  14. Hello there, has anybody built the Trumpeter one yet? Any information on how you can buy it... internationally?
  15. Thank you very much for the reference photos. I did also notice shortly after my first post here that my Fujimi a-7D kit has Mk. 82 Snakeyes to be attached in MERs. Comparing the snakeyes from both kits, Hasegawa's are too long. No wonder, they'll never fit. This makes in the second non-technical limitation error from Hasegawa's (the first calling the Strike Eagle in Euro One camo F-15E instead of YF-15E.
  16. On the topic of weapons' load on the A-6... and similar aircraft: Is it possible to put Mk. 82 snakeyes one in front of another on a MER? In other words, can I pack a MER with six of 'em? My 1/72 scale hasegawa weapon's pack says no for what, half a millimeter? But I beg to differ. (half a millimeter is around 3cm in real life in that scale and I've already pushed the rear bomb all the way back and the front bomb all the way ahead.
  17. I'd like to give 'em a call, see if they can rebox those great fujimi kits that are sadly discontinued (I'm thinking the A-4, A-6, A-7, H-3, H-46, and why not, the A-1, too!)
  18. Hmm, why would Revell box an Academy kit?
  19. I totally agree with you. I will use the word more carefully. There can't be too many "iconics" at the same time!
  20. We're getting closer... I read a book a few months ago by an H-34 Marine pilot. He describes these helicopters as burning very very fast, in a matter of seconds, because of their (magnesium?) allow fuselage. At the end of the book, he includes his blogspot which he maintains online. The Adventures of a Helicopter Pilot by Captain Bill Collier. http://dawgdriverforever.blogspot.com/ This is perhaps an Iconic helicopter overshadowed by the Huey.
  21. Would you know how many Marine Choctaws were used in the Vietnam war? I am beginning to understand that that was a very popular helicopter before the Huey but I can't seem to find information on its use by the Marines.
  22. Hi there, I have an FS 36173 and I don't know what model I bought it for. What are you using these colors for anyway? Mine is Mr Color 13 neutral grey.
  23. Again, very insightful. Thank you very much. To be clear, the TOW Cobras, whether S models or T models, appeared in the late 70s, way after Vietnam. So during Vietnam there was essentially the G and J Cobra. Oive drab and field green. US Army and Marines respectively. To my knowledge, although some of these helicopters might have been used by a specific branch to a very small extent, this is how it mostly worked out (according to my casual research). Main ones in bold. US Army helicopters: Cobra, Huey, Chinook, Kiowa, Cayuse, Tarhe. US Army helicopters LIMITED SERVICE IN EARLY SECOND INDOCHINA WAR: Chicksaw, Shawnee, Choctaw, Mojave, Raven, Retriever, Sioux. USAF helicopters: Jolly Green Giant, Pave Low, Huskie, Iroquois. USAF helicopters LIMITED SERVICE IN EARLY SECOND INDOCHINA WAR: Chicksaw, Shawnee, Sioux. NAVY helicopters: Sea King, Sea Sprite, Sea Stallion, Huskie, Iroquois? Sea Knight? Cayuse? NAVY helicopters LIMITED SERVICE IN EARLY SECOND INDOCHINA WAR: Chicksaw, Choctaw, Raven, Retriever, Sioux? Marines Helicopters: Sea Knight, Sea Stallion, Iroquois?, Huskie?. Marines Helicopters LIMITED SERVICE IN EARLY SECOND INDOCHINA WAR: Chicksaw, Choctaw, Mojave Once the war got well under way, the camo schemes were mostly as follows: US Army helicopters were mostly olive drab. USAF helicopter were mostly SEA camo though sometimes simplified with one less tone of green and/or wrap around. Navy helicopters were... no clue. Marine helicopters were wrap around field green. Please feel free to make any corrections, comments, whatever.
  24. I really do think we've gone from iconic to a simple list. The AH-1G and AH-1J? The Jolly Greens? In all seriousness, I view the Skyhawk, the Intruder and the Phantom as the most iconic perhaps because they were not only famous but because they remained in use. I now know that the F-105 was important but since it was discontinued back then, I, as a 30 y/o, didn't know about it at first and the lack of plastic models of that jet only makes it worse. Personally, I like the SEA camo very much and with the help of primer and liquid silicone, I want to paint only camo from now on (I used to avoid camo before).
×
×
  • Create New...