-
Posts
870 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Profiles
Forums
Media Demo
Posts posted by TallBlondJohn
-
-
2 hours ago, Coors54 said:
'What's the matelot in the fifth picture doing? Having a kip or trying to find his keys? 😃
Â
Passed out from rum, s*d*my and the lash probably. There's always one who can't take it.
Â
The ship's not in a bad shape for 8 months - no pre-shading to be seen!
- 1
-
Thanks for the photo work, hope the build is still going
-
Me too - no Spitfire. Not even the classic Airfix mark IX though I coveted it greatly. I do have a Vb in the stash but its a seaplane so does it still count? Also never built a P-47 and I cant remember a 109 come to think of it.
Â
But built HMS Hood and Ark Royal at least 4 times each, and 3 Sopwith Camels. I'm probably the only person on the planet with two Airfix Boeing 314s.
-
Anybody else seeing just a string of numbers instead of pictures?
-
Just wondering - why use oil paint for the tail? Any special reason, or just a better white?
Â
Thanks
ÂJohn
-
Old Roden decals, always the same
Having a decal breakdown... drives me insane!
Â
Ahem.
Â
Looks good!
- 2
-
Lovely - I have this in the stash. Any advice?
Â
Thanks
-
The infamous Airfix Panther, 1961 and wrong on so many levels. Even getting the tracks on deserves a gold star.
-
And any dust is just extra snow! Brilliant!
-
22 minutes ago, perdu said:
And there is a passageway at the front where crew access to each other seems uncomfortable
Â
Â
Well err yes - it would be. Interesting mental image...
Â
- 1
- 2
-
7 hours ago, Exkiwiforces said:
But I have a funny suspicion that the dark grey colour is a tad too dark for the flight deck?
Â
Â
Does look a bit dark - maybe a case of the paint colour is accurate, but scale effect, fading and weathering need to be simulated? When I get this sort of thing I carefully mist with very thinned light sea grey (10%ish) to reduce the contrast of everything. If you can see the result as you do it you've done too much - it should only show up as before/after
-
I echo all the above. Lovely kits (in superb boxes), but not for beginners. I have encountered fit issues, usually with interiors. For instance their 1/72 Camel comes with a lovely little cockpit assembly complete with framing - that doesnt even remotely fit in the fuselage. Its like its meant to be displayed separately. But all part of the fun.
Â
I've never had a Roden where the decals werent difficult, but my large unbuilt stash of them is least ten years old so I live in hope that's been fixed.
- 1
-
Always liked the Wimpy since building the old Matchbox one. And splendid job on the paintwork with the correct sharp edges - none of that airy-fairey soft stuff in the RAF thank you! Maybe its the light but just the right amount of fade as well.
- 2
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Ad-4N said:
Amazing that in the ancient days they had the money to build three separate strategic bombers at the same time. Â
Â
I read a story of a V-Force crew who visited a SAC base on exercise. A USAF ground crewman asked them if their aircraft was a Valiant or a Victor - they told him it was a Vulcan. Their host said 'Gee, I wish we could afford three strategic bombers'. The RAF guys nodded, thinking yes, we wish Britain could afford them too...
- 1
-
6 hours ago, billn53 said:
their F-102s were replaced with Cessna Skymasters in 1974
Â
Â
Â
Lol - I bet they enjoyed the change of pace - not!
- 1
- 4
-
Lovely camo job - I was going to 'humoursly' suggest it should be various shades of grey, but looks like it would work very well anywhere in the central belt. Clavework graphics has a few Scottish what-if profiles, funny how they are all for a republic as well.
-
I wouldnt worry about the two deck colours, it makes sense that the fresh planking added at the rebuild would look different from the old stuff. Given the period I'd have installed a spotter plane and hangar, very useful for convoy duty.
Â
Are you planning to update the funnels? They would make her look much more modern - and if the boilers have been replaced (very likely due due to the huge performance improvement) then new funnels would be required. Looking more like a QE or Revenge would also frighten off raiders.
-
Looks totally normal to me. Which way does it fly? 😉
-
Its even got a bit of a sharkmouth...
Â
Thinks - how about adding a Vulcan to the team...?
- 1
- 1
-
Â
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-50670743
Â
Some good pictures too. Sounds like they are looking for other members of the German squadron (with the usual TV deal of course)
- 6
-
25 minutes ago, Merlin said:
Hi,
Thanks Jamie,
I will look to see what Uschi do, trouble is I have some objects that need trapping between a number of strands and any stretch wont keep them aligned as intended, and using nylon for those and stretchy for others wont see a match in the sizes and appearance. It will have to be nylon for all on one model and uschi for all on another. Glad there is an alternative to twisty look for EZline.
Â
TallBlondJohn, trouble with pairs is going from a flimsy stern mast to centre mast, there is no way of pulling sternmast aft, ditto bow mast.
Â
Merlin
For those lines - techincally wires I guess -Â I use fishing line and get the built in curve to provide the sag. Having those lines tight never looks quite right to me -
On 11/30/2019 at 1:24 PM, Chief Cohiba said:
Many thanks for the video as well, I've just started a few weeks ago with RoF (again, after a few years break) but still in the learning phase. It takes a lot of rudder work, to keep this planes in position, right? 😉
Â
Being only a casual player, it might deserve a bit more time than I am able to invest at the moment, but I can feel the immersion, if only in flying around and enjoying the scenery...
Â
But, of course, I'm very grateful for any beginners hints from an obviously much more experienced player!
Â
I confess I havent played in quite a while - practise is the main thing. Its not a simple arcade game for sure
-
It is possible to make a silk purse out of this but yeah just have fun. The cockpit is worth doing (OK bit late now) and there's not that much scribing to do. IIRC I widened the fuselage rather than sanding down the canopy, and my engine nacelles where short shot and had to be rebuilt with filler. It's worth adding the nose landing light, it just looks wrong without one.
- 1
-
They are odd, ugly ships - yet somehow look right. Can't put my finger on it - maybe its the proportions. Or its nobody does slanted funnels like the RN.
ICM Tupolev 144 in 1/144
in Work in Progress - Aircraft
Posted · Edited by TallBlondJohn
spelling
Look at the real aircraft photos above. A bit skuffed and worn, but no panel line pre-shading effect to be seen. Or on any other in service aircraft I've ever seen. That's all I'm going to say on the subject 🙂
Â
Lovely build so far, - makes one realise how good looking the 144 is. Even better than Concorde in places? The canards do let it down a bit though.