Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

1,251 profile views

Knight_Flyer's Achievements

Very Obsessed Member

Very Obsessed Member (5/9)



  1. I've not heard of SEA 1 and SEA 2 either... also agree it is risky using restored aircraft that is museum or air show birds as references for colour matching. Those planes aren't always painted to being historically correct. The people looking after them are probably more concerned with preserving the history behind the plane and the schemes painted are just representative of the period... not necessarily accurate.
  2. No, I've managed to sand and file the parts so the fit looks acceptable... took me a fair amount of work. The top of the engines are suppose to be level with the surface of the wing. Without any alteration, the engine will sit below the wing with a noticeable step up. It's the sort of thing I expect from a short run East European kit not a brand such as Airfix.
  3. Good choice, the Stuka is a nice kit and be my recommendation too. The 262 may have been the first, unfortunately those poor fit engines is probably a hassle you could do without... unless you want the challenge of seeing if you can complete it before throwing it against the wall
  4. I think the undercart assembly is the main concern for me. It reminds me of the Airfix 262 engines and I found that fiddly to get right. I don't mind doing some work as long as it's not fiddly in the sense of tedious, annoying and requiring a lot of time and effort to get right... otherwise I may as well only buy short run East European model kits Thanks for doing the list, it's useful to know
  5. From what I've seen, the Hobby2000 F-111 kit are reissues of the Hasegawa with cartograf decals and canopy masks. Only thing that puts me off is the price - around £50 although I did see one advertised for £42... then again - are old Hasegawa kits going for around that price these days on ebay? It was a few years since I last bought one and won it for around £20. From a modelling aesthetic view, I prefer to build F-111 models with wings swept forward... just think it looks better in that position
  6. From reading the comments it seems to me there is no "accurate" Spitfire Ia as such. Not too different from the conclusion about the Hasegawa Wildcat vs the Airfix Wildcat... neither is perfect and each have their own pro's and con's - really down to the modeller to decide which kit they like the look of more As for the vintage Airfix Spitfire Ia derived from the Vb... is this the one? Please ignore the Spit in the foreground as that is the new tooling. I did encounter a few fit issues particularly with the lower wing section joining the fuselage. Otherwise I found it reasonably ok to build.
  7. Neat looking build. I have the Mi-24P somewhere... will get round to building it someday... as soon as I get round the parts count
  8. Very nice result. Although I'm more impressed with the price - £8.99... don't see many kits for that amount of money
  9. Great looking build. I like how you managed to enhance the raised panel lines instead of sanding and rescribing them.
  10. Thanks guys, that makes it more clearer on what the others were saying. Think I will err on the safe side with the acrylics... so if paint does flake off... I just start all over again with a different technique
  11. Not in the RFI section. If you look at the rules pinned to this section it says: "The critiquing/advice is meant for the skill set of the builder, not the accuracy of the build and is meant to encourage development of those skill sets and the sharing of ideas." There are other more relevant forum sections for discussing the accuracy of a kit. In fact there's already a thread about the Airfix MiG-15 here: https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/58911-the-new-airfix-mig-15-so-whats-wrong-with-it/
  12. So I have a Tamiya tank first tooled in 1975 and the tank tracks being made of a strange feeling material... went on a bit of a search for more information about how to paint... and immediately got scared when the first expert said be careful what you do, use the wrong paint and you will melt the tracks. Really, is it that dangerous to even attempt any painting? After wading through what seems like an entire encyclopaedia of various comments and advice... I'm still confused So, making an attempt to make a simple answer of the information overload... can anyone say have I got the following right? I can use Tamiya acrylic paint for the tracks and best start with a dark metallic colour. Equally suitable is Vallejo acrylic paint. Neither of those paints should affect the vinyl. There was also mention of being able to use a Vallejo wash on top of the paint. Puzzling thing is, apparently the vinyl tracks on later Tamiya toolings can be painted with any kind of paint. Wonder why Tamiya didn't use the same material on re-issues of old toolings. Would have saved me a bit of confusion and concern
  13. I reckon you've done an excellent job. The tooling itself is ancient dating back to the 70s or may even be the 60s? No surprises it's not an easy build. Thing about the kit though, it does on UK ebay auction go for imo crazy prices. Mainly heading towards £20 or $27 USD. Throw in another £5 and you can have a new tool big model Airfix Buccaneer
  14. Very nice build. I like how you've done the panel lines. Done one of my scooters with black lines and it looked horrible, should have done it in a similar colour to yours. Looks far more realistic. The tooling is indeed a new one. One of the later boxings as well. Annoying for me as I was after VA-15 decals and Airfix didn't have this one released. Ended up sourcing aftermarket decals. Oh well
  • Create New...