Jump to content

Test Graham

Members
  • Content Count

    6,434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

272 Excellent

About Test Graham

  • Rank
    Completely Obsessed Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

794 profile views
  1. It's to come with the Dakota in a common boxing, I believe. Check on Airfix.com?
  2. The camouflage scheme had multiple purposes: the colours were chosen to reduce the contrast with the background. The patterns were designed to break up the straight lines, edges of the aircraft and the "chevrons" on the wings point in different directions. So you have concealment, deception and confusion together. I don't suppose anyone ever thought they made the aircraft invisible - but every little helps.
  3. Don't compare them to other paints, that's how errors are multiplied and become established. Compare them to the original references, as much as is possible. Merrick's paint chips were prepared by the original paint manufacturers using their records.
  4. They are indeed called mass balances. There's an awful failure case called "flutter". This was first recognised on one of the Parnell biplanes, which tore itself apart to everyone's initial mystification. What happens is that the aerodynamic forces and the structural forces create a resonance: the control surface will begin to vibrate at such a high frequency that it will rip itself off the aircraft and likely take the tail with it. This is minimised by having enough of the weight (mass) forward of the hinge point. This is what happened to Typhoons - the engine vibration caused metal fat
  5. Don't go by Tamiya, go by the colour chips in the rear of books such as those by Ken Merrick and Michael Ullman. Graugrun is an invented term: the RLM did not give name to their paints.
  6. Andy Saunders' book Spitfire on the restoration of P9374 GR.J has no suggestion of non-standard red centres to the roundel on 92 Sq.'s aircraft. There were some Spitfires build with non-standard roundel centres, but I don't recall the details. They are probably in the Ducimus booklet, if anyone has it handy.
  7. It wasn't used in Korea. Look for the Il.10.
  8. They shouldn't be green. There was some confusion with the name Greengrau given to 74 - NOT by the Germans - and Squadron Signal took to presenting their Bf109s and Fw190s in colours like the RAF scheme of the time. But a green 75 appear to be original to Gunze... There are lots of other paint ranges with 74/75 - Xtracolours and WEM Colourcoats are the ranges I'm most familiar with. From the sound of it any combination of dark and medium greys would be better than what you've got.
  9. I'm not asking who wanted the scheme - it seems clear that both did, at least for the Western Desert. The point I was raising was that it was some time between the ruling being made by the AM and scheme being "fully" adopted in the field. Some Hurricanes and Blenheims do appear in the scheme early but others clearly don't. There doesn't seem to have been any "change now!" ruling to squadrons in the front line, nor any consistent campaign to repaint examples in MUs (or ASPs?) - which may have been partially a matter of the shortage of aircraft not allowing the necessary time. The sheer tim
  10. Mark: Or is it just very faded Dark Earth? As for the dates, the AM may have described this in December 1940 but there is absolutely no doubt that aircraft kept arriving in the ME for some six months in TLS. It is worth remembering that the ME command covered a much wider area than the Western Desert, although obviously that's what we tend to concentrate on. Palestine and the arc of the "Fertile Crescent" are greener. Malta didn't like the Desert Scheme either. Chaddy: The majority of the photos in the book are perfectly convincing as TLS. As indeed are the two close-ups of VT.G. There
  11. For the Halifax, there's an old set by Ken Merrick from Aeromodeller, and a slightly less ancient set of the Merlin variant by Alfred Grainger, but I'm not sure how good they'd be for sections. You might be better contacting the Yorkshire Air Museum because for their Halifax they had nose and tail sections built from scratch, so must have had access to decent drawings. The other source would be the Handley Page Association: Harry Fraser-Mitchell was keen on modelling and has been a great help in the past. He has been ill recently, however. The HP archives may be held by the RAF Museum, but
  12. This is one of the photos in the book. I think the T is just lost against the camouflage colour rather than being over-painted. There is a high contrast between the upper-surface colours in two of the views of VT.G - counting this as one of those - but in the other two which are both close-ups there's much less contrast. (Yes, I have found a fourth photo of this aircraft.) However, the darker colour is "exchanged" in views of at least one, possibly two or more other photos of Blenheims. This could imply a repaint on K7095 (Mid Stone over the Dark Green) but the low contrast picture casts
  13. I don't think diecast and plastic/resin occupy exactly the same market place, but they overlap. Certainly for 1/144 airliners, long the classic subjects for 1/144 scale whether diecast, injected plastic, vac forms or resin. I see the civil Halifax variants as the one major omission. Much of the work for a civil Halifax will of course carry over for a military model. Fitting into a similar multi-design slot you have the Wellington/Viking/Valetta/Varsity. I'd prefer a Hastings myself. PS there is the very recent Amodel 1/144 Lancaster and Lancastrian, so despite its popularity I'd avoid t
  14. I'd like an HP Halton, with options for a civil C Mk.VIII. It would go well with the earlier Corgi 1/144 postwar airliners.
  15. Neither. MPM is a big distribution company who established a short-run production company which released kits under a number of different brand names, Karo-As being perhaps the first. MPM was initially the most common but more recently Special Hobby has been the most prolific. You could get different versions of the same kit under different brand names. Eduard is completely separate, and their products are generally a cut (or two) above the short-run companies..
×
×
  • Create New...