Jump to content

Joaquin

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Joaquin

  1. The kit was well designed and each part fits good,but a little bit too tricky,so it's still a challenge to assemle them perfectly.
  2. Minibase has a whole set of 3D print detail part for su-33(cat no. 2001),including the pilot.but mine is a different figure.I think this figure will for sale in a new set soon.
  3. Minibase has a whole set of 3D print detail part for su-33(cat no. 2001),including the pilot.but mine is a different figure.I think this figure will for sale in a new set soon.
  4. You can see my former post,there is a Su-27UB too
  5. Yep,the designer seems to forget the color guide for the weapons.Ther also forgot the decal guide on undercarriage door,and stand bar behind nose gear... Instructions for flaps have wrong numbers,you should dry fit first to correct them. Minibase released their second product su-27K,you can also refer to the new,corrected instructions for su-27k.
  6. It's better than kinetic one.It has accurate shape and much more tiny details,but also a little tricky,not easy to assemble. There's more than 100 parts in three landing gears....
  7. Hi there,this is my latest finish. Great kit from Minibase.Pilot is not included in the kit.Although in this special period,still hope you like it.
  8. I use thinned white oil paint to draw the worn effect
  9. Gunze SM206,and I add a little light grey into it.The camouflage one I used the color from Eduard's instruction,can't remember it cause it's finished in 2013.
  10. Hi everyone, this is my latest finish.Eduard profipack kit and resin wheel bay.Painted by gunze SM206.Decals from Italy seems not as good as it should be. Hope you like it!
  11. Hello there, Still very good kit from Eduard weekend edition,but some detail parts is lacking,so i recommend profi pack.The camouflage is made of big decals. the quality of the decals are very good, but it still took a lot of time to deal with it, and it was still not perfect in the end. This biplane seems to be relatively unpopular, and there is very little information that can be found on the Internet. and this is how I take the photos
  12. yeah I spent about one week to finish all the stencel(2-3 hrs per day) but I highly recommend this kit.It has great details,but not so tricky to assemble.Decals are also of high quality
  13. I paint Gunze SM06 mixed with black,then paint clear blue,clear yellow,clear red and clear brown in different area.After painting these,draw tiny details and lines with oil paint.
  14. Hi everyone,this is my latest finish.simply oob.great wall's kit is very nice with great detail and above 600 decals.
  15. The zvezda kit is nice but a little bit tricky.Glad to see each part fits very well in such complex design.Auxiliary air intake is movable.so it needs to be assembled very carefully.
  16. I‘ll see after it release,but MV-22 in 1/48 is a little bit too big,and hobbyboss always make some mistakes. I'm dealing with zvezda 1/48 yak130 now and i found it very delicate
  17. it's a nice kit,stripe decals on the top of fuselage need to be done carefully
  18. Hi This is my latest finished MV-22,hasegawa kit.
  19. Thanks. I was confused when i finish with this part because of the ambiguous instruction from Revell(They even put wrong number on this two part).So i find some photos to confirm where should they be
  20. Thanks. Yes the decal is from the kit.IT fits the convex details and rivets perfectly as you can see in the detail photos. Decal for the instrument panel is also great.I cut them into pieces and apply them one by one instead of sanding the whole panel.
  21. Really nice kit and perfect decal as you can see.A little trouble in cockpit fitting,hatch door is 0.5mm wider.The rest of the kit is fine.
  22. The detail is good enough,I just add some pipe lines
  23. Hi, These are some pics of my last build. Its Eduard kit and I use some Eduard resin detail parts. Wish u like it!
×
×
  • Create New...