Jump to content

GROWLER

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GROWLER

  1. Ha! There is a similar story with my nickname)) Only in the store I criticized the Su-25 1/72 model from Zvezda .. And they told me that you should be happy that they made at least one like this!😁
  2. https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/72nd_aircraft/p-39-late-versions-n-q-from-ah-if-you-are-not-goin-t12710.html
  3. I think it will come in handy .. https://www.net-maquettes.com/ru/pictures/consolidated-pb4y-2-privateer/#
  4. What do you think - will there be a modification B? Because only this letter is not in the announcements!
  5. I follow the topic very closely, because the plane is not indifferent to me and I have known it since childhood, and besides, I think I can give an answer to this difficult question ,general melchett .. So, my research on the question: First of all, I took as a basis and long-throw photo of John Allan, and outlined it in Corel. (I tried my best to understand the true position of the wing, but I could not, since all long-focus photos are very dark due to dark coloration and there are very few of them. Also they have low resolution) I also had a side view from some edition, I don't remember.Here it is on top, and below - what I did. And images from the Pas-models website. And what we see: What's the conclusion? The wing is out of place !!! Chord higher than it should be. The only thing that I have not yet understood from the pictures of the sprues is the height of the wing profile. Since I am not registered on the Pass Models website, but I have a friend. Through him, I tried to convey to the very "taciturn" author of the 3D model the drawback I noticed, but as you can see, there is no result. But this shortcoming entailed huge problems !! The wing has left its place, the bottom view has changed, the fairings have changed, and there are still problem areas on the 2nd engine and the keel .. Nevertheless, I'm still glad. This brought the likelihood of my having a 72nd scale model a little closer 😉
  6. I will say more - there was no money (and no) even for destruction))))
  7. No, everything is ok. There are problems of a slightly different nature)). I searched for it at the time but could not find it. But the guys found it. In principle, if you ask a question there, directly, I think you can get some kind of result. Although I have already said about the coloring))) Don't be grateful! )) The only thing that can be seen in the photo is the color matching. Very good color rendering. Regarding the destruction: Yes, it is a pity that it was the participants in the events that were destroyed. And somewhere the present monuments were simply painted "highly likely". And we must face the truth, the equipment was already quite old, and the MiG-29s had been in operation for a long time. In this country, no one can afford a flying Lightning, or even more so a Vulcan))) And those who may, be preoccupied with filling their pockets, and not preserving history. In other matters, as I looked above, Sergey has already explained to you clearly enough ..))) Like this.
  8. Uncle Serge, there is no one there to answer this question.There are no participants in the events already .. We cannot even restore reliably the color of 64 boards!
  9. Yes this is true .. ((( They were cut after 2 days.
  10. No, friends! I have repeatedly asked this question on various sites, and even personally to representatives of ARK-models ... Personally, they answered: no, but on the sites they simply ignored my requests, and even deleted my requests, because there were many who wanted to have La-9/11 in 1/72, and in the discussion threads swearing began on this topic .. Why? I do not understand.. On a 48 scale, their models had sufficient demand in at least Russia, the USA, China, and possibly Korea.
  11. I will watch! I can't name the reason, but it's very interesting to follow your work!
  12. Thank ! Thanks to you, I finally understood the design of the Canberra cab))) Everything is very clear!
  13. It looks like a Christmas tree toy))) 🤣🤣👍
×
×
  • Create New...