Jump to content

vppelt68

Gold Member
  • Posts

    7,058
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vppelt68

  1. That's a real beauty, Hunker :thumbsup:

     

    I have built eight Revell Ju 88:s and one Zvezda A-5. As the Revell long wing variant kits have become unobtainable on earth, I was very close to buying a few of the Zvezda A-5/A-17 kits earlier this year despite the very high disgust in buying them due to reasons Pat just wrote above. Then I picked up my built Zvezda Ju 88 and one of my Revells, and compared their looks. After that, I didn't want to buy the Zvezda anymore. While it is a decent kit, its detailing is quite lacking compared to the Revell masterpiece. One very visible area is the rear fuselage top, that R delivers as a separate piece with beautifully engraved details. Z is just bare, due to mold limitations in doing a traditional two piece fuselage.

     

    If you get your hands on one, KDB, grab the Revell kit #04672 immediately! V-P

  2. 1 hour ago, PhantomBigStu said:

    I have a question, considering changing the scheme on an entry in another GB and entering it in this, I may do so anyway with one that is eligible before I make a decision am I correct to exclude heritage flight aircraft from this as they are civilian aircraft? 

    Yes, I think heritage/historic flight etc. equipment should be left outside of this, as the museum pieces of pre-NATO era stuff too. Now if someone wants to build the specific Jaguar that's on display in Hendon, or anything like that, they should be OK. 75 years of the Alliance means there's plenty of eligible subjects already in various museums. Not in Finland and Sweden, though :giggle:. If the museum piece depicts an operational livery/camouflage and markings, why not? V-P

    • Like 1
  3. 11 hours ago, bianfuxia said:

    Not sure if France was in NATO at the time represented by this

    This was discussed in the Chat phase. France has never left the Alliance. It did step out from various command structures to better retain and protect their national interests, but remained as a committed member as it was before. V-P

    • Like 1
  4. 2 hours ago, CliffB said:

    My apologies to all, especially V-P, but I've over-committed to Group Builds this year (again!), so will be giving this one a miss.  

    Have a good one folks :)

    That happens more often than occasionally, I know it! There's plenty of time to change your mind, though, if you miraculously find a vacant spot in your build calendar 📅 :wink:. We'll be here until late July! V-P

    • Like 2
  5. Are we there yet? :fool: Not yet, but soon!

     

    Welcome to The Britmodeller Forum NATO 75th Anniversary Group Build!

     

    When: 4.4. - 28.7.2024

     

    Host: vppelt68 - or just V-P

     

    Eligible subjects: Anything military from any NATO member country since the year that specific nation joined the Alliance is an eligible subject. In the Chat thread there's a little flag of each country in front of a BM member's name. They don't mean you'd have to build your model from that country, but it'd be great to have all of them represented! If in doubt, ask. Museum only- pieces are not good, they have had to be in operational use/readiness during the membership of the Alliance. If your name is not yet on the list, so what, it was gathered just to get this GB going in the first place. Just open your build thread and hop in!

     

    Scale and material: Of your own choice.

     

    While there is the traditional 25% rule with regard to how far progressed any project is at the start of GBs, let's treat this as an optional guideline rather than a rule. Better to get a completed model on display than another stalled project on the shelf of shame. All we ask is that you post the completion photos in the Inspiration Gallery rather than the main Gallery thread.

     

    Build (WIP) thread: All builds must have a work in progress- thread. In my opinion, builds based on recently online-reviewed kits need not document the kit more than in a general view of what you´ve got – unless You wish to do that, of course. Should you use aftermarket stuff like decals, etch, resin… please show us what you got! Multiple builds in one build thread are welcome.

     

    Gallery thread: Each post should contain just one build per entry and no more than five photos. All comments should go in the subject´s build thread only, let´s keep the gallery neat and tidy!

     

    Swapping: Any parts/decals/kits etc. that you want to buy or sell must be posted in the Buy/Sell area only. We can inform fellow members if have something of this subject in the trading area.

     

    Poll: There will be one when the GB concludes, for all the completed models only. Please don't canvas for votes.

     

    Recommendations: Have fun!

     

    Regards, your Host and a big thanks to Enzo again for setting this up and running these for us :yahoo:. V-P

    • Like 5
  6. 14 hours ago, Jari Lehtonen said:

    I'd like to join this GB as well. My plan is to build an Airfix 1:48 Supermarine Seafire F.XVII used by No.767 Naval Air Squadron, Royal Naval Air Station Yeovilton, in 1950. If that's cutting too close to the beginning, my backup plan is a Tamiya 1:72 F-16CJ used by USAFE in 2011 in Germany.

     

    I'm itching to build something in 1:48 after three planes in 1:72, though...

     

    /Jari

    Hello Jari at 10 miles away from my home

     

    They'd both be perfect subjects for this group build! Build one of them first and then the other? A pair of Aviano F-16C Block 40E:s was on display at Turku Air Show in 2015 - why not build one of those with our local interest in them? I have enough pics of them to detail them, and I believe DACO/Astra has a decal set ASD7208 for 510 FS "Buzzards" 89-2026, if not for 89-2030 flagship. The Tamiya kit should be perfect except maybe the Block 40 has the larger WAR HUD - but the difference in 1:72 scale, eh?

    DSCN2481

    They had very nice loads too; AN/ALQ-131(V), AN/AAQ-33, wingtip AIM-120:s, an AIM-9X, a travel pod...

    DSCN2484

    ...and this captive AIM.

    DSCN2609

    V-P

    • Like 3
  7. 5 hours ago, Vesa Jussila said:

    There was also article about this plane in Finish magazine "Ilmailuhistoriallinen Lehhti"

     

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bytF-05TOmtTX0v0ry9zd9N8W7CUCl7N/view

     

    Maybe someone in this forum have a copy of article. I don't have these anymore. Maybe @vppelt68 can help?

     

    Some of these planes were planned to go Finland, but were never delivered.

    Sorry, can't help. Interesting airplane, though.

    • Thanks 1
  8. 37 minutes ago, Creepy Pete said:

     

     

     

    I know, but I like the idea of the assignements. I also noticed I now have Canada instead, just when a bunch of Danish decals arrived in the mail. :penguin:

     

    I guess I now have to build both! Oh dear, what a shame. :coolio:

    Enzo will approve that attitude :thumbsup:

    • Like 1
  9. Thanks, this is a great clip!

     

    I think the inner wing structure was steel and thus required anti-corrosion treatment (paint) regardless of the aluminium airframe finish. Ball turrets, and chin turrets, came from subcontractors and had Neutral Grey finish long after the fuselage painting was dropped.

     

    Seattle built B-17:s had the staggered waist positions added at assembly line since block G-50-BO, and staggered and bulged cheek positions since late G-60-BO block. In the film the planes got both, so that dates it in late April -44 as earliest. The planes don't yet have the later tail gun position, which came in late block G-80-BO or early G-85-BO, depending on sources, so that again dates it at mid July -44 as latest.

     

    My guess is G-60...65 blocks, April to May -44.

    V-P

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  10. 1 hour ago, klr said:

    I admire your sense of adventure/optimism (delete as applicable) 😬

     

    It's actually from 1974. I had three of these in the stash. Two got recycled via my local hobby shop. Whoever ended up buying them, all I can say is caveat emptor. The oldest of the three (Heller-Humbrol era) could not be resold, as the packaging was too far gone. I have classified it as "Trash", meaning I will never build it, nor sell it. I may extract some spare parts however.

    Pat will love it, then :winkgrin:

    • Haha 3
  11. Alexey, in your opening post you wondered about Kuivalainen photo etch. By Eduard, but not Eduard. Mr. Martti Kuivalainen ran for decades the best hobby shop in Finland. He produced several etch and decal sets for Finnish AF specific subjects, and subcontracted the PE job at Eduard. He then sold all the sets exclusively at his shop in Helsinki, and on-line of course. That was probably ten or more years ago, when Eduard was not yet the current megamodelmaker Eduard. I wasn't back at hobby yet.

    Then Martti retired and sold the shop a few years ago. It didn't last many years in new hands before capsizing, unfortunately.

×
×
  • Create New...