Jump to content

Pappy

Members
  • Posts

    3,286
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Pappy last won the day on October 1 2015

Pappy had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Brisneyland, Oz
  • Interests
    Pina Colada's and getting caught in the rain

Recent Profile Visitors

8,151 profile views

Pappy's Achievements

Very Obsessed Member

Very Obsessed Member (5/9)

6.5k

Reputation

  1. Hopefully the re-worked title will now answer that question Thanks very much gents Thank you very much, everything fits so well it and there was really only one basic colour. I have to agree, this kit flies together (sorry couldn't resist!) and I can see myself building a few more. I am sure that the Eduard kit has finer detail but for the price, it is hard to beat the value of this kit. Thanks very much, I love doing cockpits so it does not seem like a chore. G'day people, Well I have spent most of the weekend doing the ol' fill-sand, repeat (FSR) dance. The issue is not to do with the fit of the kit, Tamiya have really excelled in that department but rather it is the detail. The kit features beautifully recessed panel lines but North American's practice at the time was to putty the seams on the forward half of the wing, prime, sand and then paint the wings in gloss silver dope to reduce drag and extract as much aerodynamic performance from the laminar flow wing. That means that most of the wing panels needed to be filled. I brushed on some liquid filler and lightly wet sanded. I did this twice and there were some persistent spots that needed additional applications. Once satisfied, I masked off the panels that would not have their seams filled and shot a primer coat over the top to see how it would look under paint. The primer was also wet sanded with sanding sponges to get a nice smooth finish as befits such a speed queen I am pleased with the result - smoother than a baby's proverbial! A cheeky test fit followed to ensure all the parts still play nice together The fit is still sublime. By way of reward and as a motivation during the rounds of FSR I painted up the u/c. I have added some brake lines to the main gear as well as decal data plates. My reference pics show that the airfield conditions that 3SQN was operating in were very basic and the aircraft were consequently quite grubby with the wheels being very muddy. The pics also show that the main fairings (the larger wheel door covers) were closed with only slight sagging evident so most of that wheel well detail will not be seen. This saves me the trouble of replicating all the hydraulic 'spaghetti' that is missing, cheers, Pappy
  2. G'day people, I have been waiting for this GB to roll around. I have had this one in the stash since the last Mustang GB. I ran out of time to build it that time so hopefully I can get this one built this time around. I cracked the bags on this one today and while only intending to have a quick peek, one thing led to another and some paint brushes were used in anger.... The end result at end of day's play today I had some PE handy and although I dd not use all of it, most of it was handy. The seat beltswere especially welcome as I did not fancy using the provided decal. The only additional detail added by me was a couple of electrical cables for the radio Although there are some pretty healthy looking ejector pin marks, there were only a couple that needed removing from each fuselage half, the others will be hidden from view when the fuselage halves are joined. I also managed to get the wing together Plus a cheeky dry fit I have often heard this kit referred to as a 'mojo restorer', and I can see why, after a day it is nearly assembled! Despite owning a few Tamiya kits I have not actually built that many but I can see the appeal as Tamiya's reputation for excellent fit and engineering has not disappointed. The main gear bay does feature a major inaccuracy in the the rear of the kit bay features a bulkhead that follows the bay opening whilst IRL the rear of the bay was the main-spar which was recessed further back. Airfix and other contemporary kits correctly represent this feature but I am not bothered enough to correct it. I don't think the bite is worth the chew but of course others may feel compelled to correct it. I still need to source decals and and a few other bits and pieces so I expect there will some ebb and flow while I wait for these bits to arrive, cheers, Pappy
  3. Be the first! Pappy
  4. Great subject and agreat start, watching with interest, cheers, Pappy
  5. G'day Enzo, The airbrakes were disabled for in-flight use on later variants (and the perforated doors replaced with the sold doors but there were excpetions) and they could be opened to access equipment for ground maintenenace. The early A-6As initially did not have the wingtip split airbrakes but this feature was added once the fatigue/cracking issues associated witht the fuselage airbrakes was discovered. As you can see in the pic of the EA-6A, these aircraft retained the use of their fuselage airbrakes as being based on early build A-6As, they did not have the wingtip speed brakes. The lack of actuator fairings above and below the wing is the give-away, cheers, Pappy
  6. Deep Saxe Blue (DSB) is the correct colour for practice rounds (typically referred to as HES - High Explosive Simulated) but these rounds can vary in hue. Practice rounds do not contain any explosive fill and are rated for flight and can be dropped as their CofG and mass equivalence is similar to a HE round If the HES round has been built up to be dropped from new stock, then the colour will be more vibrant than a round that has been built up and just used to practice ground loading which may be stored outside in the weather and hence subject to fading, oxidation and other weathering effects. Just to confuse the issue, a practice round can also be painted olive drab but with a DSB band on the nose denoting an inert fill. This is rare and typically done when someone wants to make their air show display jet look tough. Drill rounds usually refer to rounds that are not cleared for flight and used for ground training only. These drill rounds are a darker blue like Oxford Blue and typically have the words "DRILL" and "NOT FOR FLIGHT" stencilled in white, As stated above HES rounds may also be used for the same task in which case they may take on a faded and weathered appearance. cheers, Pappy
  7. I remember when I bought my first 1/48 Airfix Buccaneer kit (the legacy kit not the re-tooled one), I was also speechless, it was the WORST fitting kit I had ever seen. It did go together well once I learned that the secret to joining the fuselage was to do it is stages, cheers, Pappy
  8. Maybe try looking at Zvesda, they do several MIL Mi-8/17 kits cheers, Pappy
  9. One other thing, The Academy F-111 kits seem to include most of the EF-111A parts in the common sprues along with both the TP1/TP2 intakes. If you wanted to build a Raven and could not find their kit readily available, you could buy the Ozmods Raven tail and just use any of the Academy short wing F-111 kits as a workaround, cheers, Pappy
  10. 🤣 I just spilled my coffee! Great story! Pappy
  11. G'day Filler, I believe these are resin copies of the Academy kit part(s), no extra detail or corrections applied. I think the intent was for people to paint them up as stand-alone examples of applicable 'tail art'. Unlike their USAF counterparts, most RAAF F-111s had art applied to the fin (instead of the nose) when special schemes were applied. These trophy tails allow people to just make the tails instead of the whole jet, at least that is what I think the intent was, cheers, Pappy
  12. G'day Ed, Many thanks, that is exactly what I needed, gps dome and no tail sensor, it looks like ALE-40 mod as well, cheers, Pappy
  13. G'day Mike, Thanks. I have read Mr Vark's guides previously and although they are an excellent source of generic information my questions are more specific. Thank you for the link to the flight manual, that is very much appreciated, cheers, Pappy
  14. G'day people, I want to build a Raven (Spark Vark) and while looking through the on-line pics I have seen a few different equipment configurations. The areas that I need information concern the CMDS installation at the rear of the jet on either side of the engine exhausts, the tail and the area in front of the windscreen. My subject jet is 66-0044 (Straight Flush') based at Cannon AFB and my questions are, 1. Did this jet have the GPS dome installed in front of the windscreen when it carried the nose art? The GPS dome seems to have been a later addition. 2. What type of CMDS config was installed. I believe the initial fit was ALE-28 but later pics show Ravens were upgraded with the ALE-40 system which had larger fairings and four dispenseres per side for a total of eight 3. Did the rear of the ECM 'football' have the IR sensor installed or was this plated over? The system was removed toward the end of the Raven's service. and finally some generic questions. Most F-111s have antenna panels embedded within the Forward Equipment Bay (FEB) doors 1101/1102/1201 and 1202 however it seems from the pics that on Ravens the 'I' shaped antenna on the rear FEBs (1102/1202) was deleted and that some of the ECM panels on the fwd FEBs were also deleted? It is hard to tell as the light camouflage colour makes it hard to see the outlines of the dielectric panels, cheers, Pappy I assume that the Compass Sail and Strike Camera fairing swere also removed/not installed? cheers, Pappy
  15. Hi Dennis, That was extremely hwlpful, thank you Hello Tomas, that ias very kind of you, no rush but I am leaning towards the Grigio Azzurro Chiaro now G'day Giogio, I have never had succuss spraying Lifecolour. Still, I can use that asa reference point to match in some other paint range. The Stormo site suggests FS36307 as an approximate match in one of their tables - that one I have! Thank you all for the prompt replies, cheers, Pappy
×
×
  • Create New...