Jump to content
This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

Agent K

Members
  • Content Count

    242
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Agent K

  1. Agent K

    Eurofighter

    Given that the twin-engined EF2000/Typhoon was developed directly from the twin-engined BAE EAP which flew before the single-engined Lavi, there really is no lineage between the Lavi and the EF2000. The EF2000 was/is a four-nation design British/Italian/German/Spanish drawing upon the engineering and skills of these countries and nowhere else. If an lineage can be drawn, it's between the F16 and the Lavi. Nice model however.
  2. Apologies, but when I see a survey that can't even spell there (*their) correctly it sets a level of expectation to me and I'd question the capability behind such an endeavour. I do hope, of course, I am quite mistaken.
  3. Not sure if anybody noticed but in a recent photo of the F35's (in formation with the LN F15's and the B2) one was missing the nose roundel, anyone any ideas why?
  4. It's obviously a Type 45 destroyer...……...
  5. Agreed, I'd also add, to the above, that the F35 has, I believe a decent amount of "electronic wizardry" on board and stealthiness and therefore wouldn't need, quite so much, to have a dedicated EW aircraft (which is something the UK has never had anyway).
  6. 25 Squadron are already "stood up" they fly Hawk T2's at Valley.
  7. It's very easy to make these comments but unless you're involved in the strategy and planning within a finite budget, they are actually very logical. Yes I'd like to see more aircraft flying, and a larger air force, it's been trimmed far too much, but blame the government that sets the budget. The rationale, of course, to reduce the 2-seater fleet is that more training is done on simulators (synthetic training I believe they call it) now meaning a decreased requirement for 2-seaters, hence RTP and sustain the combat fleet. Hours will be managed and this is not a problem.
  8. There’s a few flying around in British Forces parachute training contracts and appearing on the display scene a few times.
  9. Wow, just wow, that is simply awesome, well done.
  10. My brother was on the design team, I flew on them a lot. I think it was a good, solid and robust classic British design (like the 1-11 etc.) which has a very good safety record. The engines, I guess were fit for purpose, not highly powered but it had 4 which gave a good safety margin, and are from the same family as the Chinook engines. Enjoyed flying it with uninterrupted views of the land below due to the high wing.
  11. QRA is, I believe still split between the 2 bases, and SHADER aircraft have come from both bases I believe so although yes the security implications are what I've always heard, it doesn't quite make 100% sense if fleets are pooled from both stations?
  12. 207 was always the next planned squadron, it's the OCU, chosen for reasons of having a joint RAF and RNAS/RN heritage. The next operational squadron to stand up will be, of course, and as always planned, 809.
  13. I think 29 still have just a few aircraft in markings, but 3 and 11 don't anymore (I stand to be corrected but I don't think they've been seen in markings for some while).
  14. Share your thoughts and have expressed similar myself over the past couple of years. Whilst, ultimately with squadron and unit markings I guess the operation is paramount and they are the priority to be met, and there's stealth and considerations with the F35, it clearly is possible. For the Typhoon it would be nice to see unit badges and fighter bars back again. It seems Lossie can do this, but not CBY? Wouldn't it be nice to see 3, 11 and and 29 markings back again. The link between the public and the forces is important for the continued support and I think both the markings and engagement and presence goes a long way to achieving that. I've said before that the RAF especially has pulled out of a lot of bases and there are areas of the country no longer with a (significant) permanent base or presence, namely the NW and SW. As you say, I think that is where the link is breaking. I've also, perhaps controversially, noted where the RAF (and I understand the "public display" connotations and implications) do provide a significant amount of support to family days (and the family support is to be appreciated and recognised, I fully support that) where over the past few years as the public RAF display offering has reduced to a Typhoon and sporadic Tutor and Tucano, the family days have seen types not seen on the display circuit, such as the Tornado, Merlin's, Pumas and the large types too. I think this too leads to the disengagement from the masses. My thoughts too.
  15. Sorry, yes, I hear what you are saying!
  16. An interesting discussion here, I too find it surprising/interesting on some of the schemes and designs and colours. The Wildcat mentioned earlier (in Army guise) yes I understand the consistency with the whole Army and Navy fleet, but aesthetically let alone operationally, the previous grey and green scheme is better? (At least part of) the role of camouflage is to break up the shape of the object, and you see that in the F15 (C/D), F16 and F22 with soft blended lines and different shades. It was always strange to see a hard straight line between the upper grey and the underside on the likes of the Tornado F3 which although I guess it blended from a distance I'd have thought a feathered line and greys would have been better. Also it always surprises me that the same aircraft built to do the same role, interpret and have different flavours of camouflage dependent on the operator, for example the Typhoon, where the British, Germans and Saudis all have different schemes and shades of grey, with only the Saudi examples having a scheme and pattern that breaks up the shape of the aircraft to a degree. A fascinating topic!
  17. I'd suspect that it's a shed load cheaper to maintain that consistency rather than having to have your own drawings and stencils and paint shop plans and RAM concerns! etc. etc. etc…...
  18. A tale me thinks......… Surely, the "RAF" would already have known how good the F15 was through exchange pilots, through exercises, through reading the specs (I'd imagine the F15 was at least an RFI for the Interceptor requirement. It's not like we're not close allies and such! The F3, for better or worse was designed to meet a requirement for a long range interceptor (operating way out over the North Sea) with associated radar, equipment and weapons performance), and ultimately to operate a second fleet type, to modify for probe and drogue would have been highly prohibitive vs a Tornado fleet.
  19. Given that they're currently constructing a 3 bay hangar at Lossiemouth to support the fleet, I'd imagine so yes.
  20. I think, people, that unless you've had access to the contract framework and contract schedules, then you cannot possibly comment on whether it's good, bad or indifferent, especially the services (delivered) and finance schedules. I wouldn't be prepared to comment one way or another. As someone has pointed to here, it's not just "buying" or supplying tankers, it's buying a package, a service, to a requirement, and that includes not only the aircraft but the infrastructure, the hangar, the support and logistics chain, training etc etc. and believe me (I operate in the civilian sector and have experience here) that is a sizeable cost, if you have to set it all up yourself. So PFI changes the balance of financing such a procurement, avoiding the heavy frontloading of procuring and setting up with your own financing, and spreading the cost more evenly, over the duration of the project, and it's a valid financing option. Who here leases a car? with a maintenance package?, or HPA's a sofa etc. for the same reasons? Airlines will mix and match leased and procured aircraft giving an amount of operational and financial flexibility. Ultimately how the contract is written and negotiated, and that's where the experience and efforts pays off, dictates the service.
  21. Wow, just wow!!!!!!! and what century have you arrived from? do you think she's good at hoovering the museum too and making the tea? I think you'll find the museum is run by a leadership team composed of people from both sexes and equally experienced irrespective of sex.
  22. I'd suggest that they wouldn't design, produce and release a new kit purely based on your request!!!! They might listen to and canvas some opinion, and if the data suggests there might be an appropriate volume of sales, and profit margin etc. etc. they might investigate. There is a lot more selecting projects for production than just peoples requests. How many times have we seen people requesting particular kits, only to then whinge about the cost when it is released and not buying it.....
  23. Think I saw some photos of a test Merlín flying with the “bag” installed recently.
  24. This looks really nice, just a quick question I can't seem to see, apologies if it is there, is this injection, resin, or both? thanks.
  25. Welcome aboard, what an interesting story and some great work done there already! It's an interesting question and a more complex situation, for me at least, than just buying a model. Like yourself, it would appear, I too spent every bit of pocket money on Airfix and Matchbox (the 2 readily available manufacturs at the time where you could pop into Woolies or your local post office and buy something for the half term. Grew up next to RAF Leeming so I always wanted to build the aircraft we saw daily which was all RAF types, all USAF(E) and a good few NATO. We'd previsously lived next to Hurn airport and again I'd wanted to replicate the types seen there too. Airfix catared for a lot of those. Some 30 years or so later and still enjoying a career in aviation I'm making models again, and enjoying it, for the challenge and finished results, but also the peace and relaxation it gives me now. Going back to the original question, I am brand loyal as a person, and also there is an amount of finding that childhood pleasure again, so yes if it's there in Airfix, I'll buy it, by way I guess of thanks for my childhood. That doesn't stop me, however, buying another manufacturers products if I like a kit.
×
×
  • Create New...