This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

  • Announcements

    • Mike

      Ongoing DDoS Attack causing Forum Slowness   26/04/17

      In case you have missed the announcement, the reason that the forum has been slow at times since the minor version update the other day is due to a Denial of Service attack, brute force attack on our email, and judging by the lag with our FTP response, that too.  If you're feeling like you're experiencing a glitch in the Matrix, you're not wrong.  This is the same MO as the attack in September 2016 that occurred when we transitioned to the new version 4 of the software.  We're currently working with US and UK cyber-crime departments, who specialise in this sort of thing, and we're hopeful that we'll be able to track them down this time by using the accumulated evidence already held.    We are pretty certain that it's a continuation of the same attack last year, only at a reduced intensity to deter people from using the site "because it's terribly slow", rather than taking it down completely, and we're also sure of the motivations of those responsible.  Spite.   Please bear with us in the interim, and wish us luck in dealing with these.... "people".
Shaun

F-4J (UK) Phantom

167 posts in this topic

On 18/2/2017 at 0:55 PM, Andre B said:

Whats the reason that there where so many different painted Phantoms in UK? Liberal regulations or regulations that no one respected?

I am glad that it is so because it is an goldmine for an modellbuilder with so many different painted aircrafts. But one wonder whats the history was behind so many different painted aircrafts (compared to the Luftwaffe Phantom's during the same period or even the US Navy, Marine and Air Force).

 

Cheers / André

 

Not sure that the Luftwaffe Phantoms can be considered as lacking in unusual paint schemes... apart from the various official schemes, a wide number of experimental schemes were tested on both the F-4Fs and the RF-4Es over time. Not to mention the many anniversary schemes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Giorgio N said:

 

Not sure that the Luftwaffe Phantoms can be considered as lacking in unusual paint schemes... apart from the various official schemes, a wide number of experimental schemes were tested on both the F-4Fs and the RF-4Es over time. Not to mention the many anniversary schemes.

 

Well..,

Luftwaffe was rader hard on unusual paint schemes during the norm 72 period and before. It was first in the 80's and after they where starting doing anniverary schemes. The same thing goes for the Swedish Air Force that always had been rather hard conserning markings that wasn't with the regulations. They usually didn't live for long when the administry found out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Giorgio N said:

 

Not sure that the Luftwaffe Phantoms can be considered as lacking in unusual paint schemes... apart from the various official schemes, a wide number of experimental schemes were tested on both the F-4Fs and the RF-4Es over time. Not to mention the many anniversary schemes.

 

The same for USAF (Light Gull Gray / White, ADC Gray, SEA / wraparound SEA / Hil Gray 1/2) and USN (Light Gull Gray / White, Light Gull Gray / White, allover Light Gull Gray, Ferris, TPS) ones.

 

Let alone the various one offs like the Black & White Bunny, the orange QF-4B's, etc. etc.

 

Cheers,

 

Andre

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andre - you missed the lizard scheme - (European 1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Giorgio N said:

 

56 Squadron had for a while one radome painted in dark red to be mounted on whatever aircraft was taking part in an airshow at some point in the '80s. Wonder if the one in your picture is that radome as the aircraft is from 56

 

Never heard of a red radome doing the rounds, but sounds interesting. Despite some comments on the below thread, the pictures suggest unpainted natural fibreglass (or whatever the official material is) which would also explain the strong brown tint to grey painted radomes. Black radomes also took on a brown tint when faded.

 

http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=45015

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some Meteor night fighters also had red/bronze/brown radomes, so it's quite possible that this appearance is due to the radomes being new and unpainted or old, tired and abraded.  The colour photos of the Meteors are, obviously, not recent so the colours may have changed over the years but the colours of the national and squadron markings are still quite good.  As the colour of the radomes appears quite uniform I'd suggest new, or at least refurbished, and unpainted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The radome on the Phantom is indeed in an earth brown fibreglass, but pictures where this colour is visible don't show the kind of smooth and gloss finish seen in pictures of "red nosed" British Phantoms. If these radomes weren't painted red or brown, at least they had received a good gloss coat.

I have unearthed a good close-up of the radome carried by XV426 "P" of 56 Sqn. during the 1987 Aviano airshow and this is in a gloss reddish brown (notes say similar to 10115). In the picture the radome really looks painted, not left in natural fibreglass. The finish is similar to the ones seen on the F-4J in the link above, including the very visible white stencilling. What I remember was that the radome was used for the "showbirds", but this was not official information, the truth may well be different. In any case the finish was not the result of wear on the radome but was deliberate

Edited by Giorgio N

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, iainpeden said:

Andre - you missed the lizard scheme - (European 1)

 

You're right!

 

In my defence, it's my least favorite USAF scheme.  ;-)

 

Cheers,

 

Andre

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, guess I am right here! Can I build the 48th scale Zoukei Mura / SWS F-4J as a UK F.3? What would I need to change? Apart from yecals of course ;)

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, exdraken said:

Can I build the 48th scale Zoukei Mura / SWS F-4J as a UK F.3?

 

I dont have the 'ZM kit, but modellingwise there isn't much difference between the F-4J and F-4J(UK) apart from 1) paint and markings and 2) the ex-Chieftain tank sight 'poor men's TISEO' fitted between the cockpits on the left later on. 

 

HTH,

 

Andre

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the ZM kit either, but I don't think it includes the strengthening strap on the underside of the wing... This is the same as found on the F-4S and on Spey Phantoms in their final years

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2017 at 7:32 AM, exdraken said:

Hi everyone, guess I am right here! Can I build the 48th scale Zoukei Mura / SWS F-4J as a UK F.3? What would I need to change? Apart from yecals of course ;)

Thanks!

 

After googling a few pictures of the kit, I noticed a lack of RHAWS fairings on the intakes....., so make sure the kit has them as well. 

 

,,,,,, and dont call it the UK F.3.....! Blasphemy I tell you..., blasphemy.....! :lol:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can build one RAF aircraft without RHAWS. I think ZE350

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed it was ZE350. She also had the "old" style, more pointed antenna fairing on the fin trailing edge and no reinforcement plates on fin sides.

 

But did ZE350 have the wing reinforcement straps? I have seen only one photo and that is not good enough to be sure...

 

Best Regards,

Antti

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I have just checked one of our Newly imported Zoukei Mura 1/48 F4J models and I can confirm that it comes with optional parts for the RHAWS.(side looking horns)

 

These can be found on Sprue H Parts 5 and 6

 

There are also two optional fin tops as well as slatted and un slatted tail planes.

 

i don think this version of the RAF Phantom have wing reinforcement straps, so other than the Periscope you can do a RAF F4J(UK)

 

Hope this helps

Edited by TIGER HOBBIESLIMITED
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/17/2017 at 10:18 AM, TIGER HOBBIESLIMITED said:

 

i don think this version of the RAF Phantom have wing reinforcement straps, so other than the Periscope you can do a RAF F4J(UK)

 

There are plenty of pictures clearly showing the reinforcement straps on the F-4J(UK).  I can not say with certainty 'all' had them, but at least 'some' had them...

 

I can't recall the source, but I remember reading an article stating the F-4J(UK) were actually F-4J's brought close to F-4S standard except for the slats.  Can anybody confirm or deny this?

 

Best regards,

 

G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2017 at 10:13 AM, guillaume320 said:

I can't recall the source, but I remember reading an article stating the F-4J(UK) were actually F-4J's brought close to F-4S standard except for the slats.  Can anybody confirm or deny this?

 

Pretty much. The purchased J`s went through NARF at North Island and brought up to an S type standard, minus the wing slats as mentioned and give or take a few systems specifically added for RAF use. The strengthening straps to the wings are noted as added `locally` once back in the UK so it would seem these were not added in the US.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now