Welcome to Britmodeller.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

  • Announcements

    • Mike

      PhotoBucket are no longer permitting 3rd party hosting   01/07/17

      As most of you are now painfully aware, Photobucket (PB) are stopping/have stopped allowing their members to link their accumulated years of photos into forums and the like, which they call 3rd party linking.  You can give them a non-refundable $399 a year to allow links, but I doubt that many will be rushing to take them up on that offer.  If you've previously paid them for the Pro account, it looks like you've got until your renewal to find another place to host your files, but you too will be subject to this ban unless you fork over a lot of cash.   PB seem to be making a concerted move to another type of customer, having been the butt of much displeasure over the years of a constantly worsening user interface, sloth and advertising pop-ups, with the result that they clearly don't give a hoot about the free members anymore.  If you don't have web space included in your internet package, you need to start looking for another photo host, but choose carefully, as some may follow suit and ditch their "free" members at some point.  The lesson there is keep local backups on your hard drive of everything you upload, so you can walk away if the same thing happens.   There's a thread on the subject here, so please use that to curse them, look for solutions or generall grouse about their mental capacity.   Not a nice situation for the forum users that hosted all their photos there, and there will now be a host of useless threads that relied heavily on photos from PB, but as there's not much we can do other than petition for a more equitable solution, I suggest we make the best of what we have and move on.  One thing is for certain.  It won't win them any friends, but they may not care at this point.    Mike.

Moonbeam McSwine P-51D 352nd FG 1/48 scale

I started this Mustang around eight years ago but ended up losing interest after installing a True details cockpit,having also drilled out the under nose inspection covers.


Fast forward to the May Bank Holiday deliberating on what to build next,I came across the Mustang lying forlornly in the stash. It was time to have another go.

The choice of which P-51D to model was pretty wide,only restricted by the inspection covers (having drilled them out I was not going to plate them over).Looking at my collection of decals,I settled on a 352nd FG aircraft The possibilities included Whisner's “Moonbeam McSwine” and Preddy's “Cripes a Mighty”. I've always found it strange considering Preddy was the highest ranking Mustang Ace.“Cripes a Mighty” is rarely modelled. The 352nd carried a rather plain scheme,but I think it's understated nature shows the lines of the P-51 off well.


I'd a number of after market parts for the P-51 in my the after market stash and decided to use the Ultra cast prop,exhaust and flaps in place of the kit's parts. I also thought I'd try the Ultra cast replacement gun fairings,the original Tamiya gun fairings are incorrect and are awkward to fix. Having lost the True details instrument panel I decided to use a replacement panel from the Eduard Zoom set.

Having stripped off the original paint the interior was sprayed dark grey to provide shading for the interior green.


The cockpit was painted with Polyscale interior green details being picked out with Tamiya paint. Mike Grant decals were used for the placards and holes were drilled for wiring. On the P-51 the cockpit floor could have been a number of colours (treated wood,painted black or interior green),I've settled for interior green.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice start Mal.

I read somewhere that this kit is probably the best starting point for a Tamiya P-51D build as its got the correct parts for all the D models.

Similar to how the Tamiya P-47M has all the right magnetos etc etc for a D-25 onwards.

Is that the case?



P-47 SIG


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

good start. Had the pleasure of building this kit myself earlier in trhe year, it was an absolute pleasure

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Tamiya P-51B and D are regarded as easy builds,but I've always had trouble with them. I've had to fill sand and re-scribe the area around the radiator on every one I've built. I don't think it's just me as I've noticed other builders have had problems with this area but it's rarely mentioned in build articles ,did you have any problems?

Another issue with the Tamiya P-51D is that the canopy has a separate frame,the joint is all but impossible to hide,this time I'm lucky as I have a spare canopy from a Hasegawa P-51D that I can use in place of the Tamiya part.

Finally the cuffs on the Hamilton Standard are much to prominent.


The F-51D does have an additional sprue that contain 500lb bombs,r.p's and supposedly an Aero Products propeller. The only problem is that the propeller is a cuffless Hamilton Standard (an Aero Products prop has a more curved blade than the Hamilton Standards) This is a pity as P-51K's and Mustang IV's used the Aero Products prop.

I agree with you on the Tamiya P-47 the "M" offers a better starting point for a late "D" & "M"

The reason I would buy the F-51D kit over the “D” is that it's generally cheaper! :thumbsup:


Edited by Mal

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a great start-looking forward to the rest of the build.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mal, its not you, if i remember that was one of two areas that needed attention. the other was on the upper wings where there was slight damage which looked as though it had been done during manufacturing. these were slight scratch like indentations, which were soon filled in.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now