Jump to content

The Elder: F-4C s/n 63-7407


Recommended Posts

'407 was referred to as "The Elder", being the first F-4C built for the USAF. It spent it's whole life as a test and test support jet in USAF's Air Force Systems Command bouncing between the 3246th Test Wing at Eglin AFB and the 6510th Test Wing at Edwards AFB, finishing up at the latter. All of the air-to-air shots were taken on May 3, 1985.

 

 

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 36cr

 

'407 transferred to Edwards in Feb 1985. The Armament Division tail code, AD, had been modified to the 6510th Test Wing tail code, ED, by painting over the A and replacing it with an E.

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 26cr

 

The maintenance forms binder that follows the jet typically just has the serial number in large characters on the cover. '407's book had the serial number and the legend "THE ELDER" in large block letters.

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 25cr

 

Refueling from NKC-135E s/n 55-3135 of the 4950th Test Wing out of Wright-Patterson AFB. The 4950th was part of AFSC's Aeronautical Systems Division, hence the ASD tail band.

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 34cr

 

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 22cr

 

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 20cr

 

63-7407 6512ts ED R2508 19850503 16cr

 

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 19cr

 

63-7407 6512ts ED R-2508 19850503 08cr

 

1990 and now an "Albino Rhino" as part of the Edwards test support fleet. Gave up the Euro 1 paint scheme in early 1988.

63-7407 6512ts ED KEDW 19900703 07cr

 

63-7407 6512ts ED KEDW 19900906 11cr

 

Name on the nose gear door...

63-7407 6512ts ED KEDW 19900906 20

 

1991 and retirement:

63-7407 6512ts ED KEDW 19911006 05cr

 

The Elder was saved and is now on display outside the Flight Test Museum at Edwards AFB.

 

Thanks for looking,

Sven

Edited by Old Viper Tester
corrected serial
  • Like 13
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Patrick Martin said:

Do you mean 63-7407?

Plus was not the first production F-4C/F-110 not 62-12199?

Corrected to 7407, as the image of the nose gear door clearly shows. Old timers disease creeping in?

 

As for 62-12199, I've always thought that this was a development airframe, even though it didn't carry the Y prefix, evidenced by it being a single airframe construction lot. The people I worked with at McAir (admittedly, mostly F-15 types) also referred to '407 as the first production C model.

 

Right or wrong, a fair segment of the F-4 maintenance and flight test community community acknowledged the title given to her, which I suppose alternatively could just indicate that, since 1967, it was the oldest F-4C in USAF service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Patrick Martin said:

Plus was not the first production F-4C/F-110 not 62-12199?

My response above is an example of why I shouldn't post just before retiring and wondering if I had reset all of the clocks before Daylight Savings Time kicked in.

 

Seeing that '199 was eventually redesigned as a Block 15 airframe would certainly indicate that it was production representative (as we would say in the test world). None of the references I have give any detail of what this aircraft looked like when it came off the line. All of the references seem to agree that the USAF was anxious to get their own Phantoms, so why only one airframe when a contract opportunity presented itself?

 

The question now vexes me. The only quotes I can find that '407 was the first production F-4C all seem to originate with Baugher's statement in his on-line serial numbers listing. It would be disappointing if the whole "'407 was the first" opinion was instigated by an enthusiastic crew chief who assumed that a post-1967 Time Compliance Technical Order had an effectivity that began with '407 and assumed that this jet was the first. Searching the web for more info results in going around in circles - at least for me.

 

If anyone has more info on the subject, I would be anxious to hear it. Would also like more info on the loss of '199.

 

Thanks,

Sven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...