Neil.C Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 I making a model of an F4F at the moment (don't ask! ) and there are couple of small glass panels in the lower fuselage in line with the cockpit. I assume they are so the pilot can view underneath for some reason, but why? Just interested really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossington 2 Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Gives positive confirmation that his undercarriage has locked down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbob Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Just to be able to look straight down, I believe. The fuel tank was in between them, and there was no "floor" on the sides of the cockpit. The windows remained until deleted on the FM-2, but I believe that there was still a rivet outline where they had been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kari Lumppio Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Hello! In the Finnish Brewster (F2A-1 / model 239) equipment list they were "bombing windows". I believe bomb aiming windows for level bombing. Cheers, Karn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmaas Posted December 30, 2017 Share Posted December 30, 2017 Bomb-aiming ventral windows were present on the F4F, F2A-1 and 2 (and all export versions, but not the F2A-3), early F4U-1's and the Grumman XF5F. Then the problems (keeping clean, repairing broken glass, need for the space for tankage, etc.) caused the enthusiasm for the idea to wane. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil.C Posted December 31, 2017 Author Share Posted December 31, 2017 Thanks for your replies. I guess bomb aiming windows would make the most sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noelh Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 2 hours ago, Neil.C said: Thanks for your replies. I guess bomb aiming windows would make the most sense. I seem to remember reading somewhere that they were simply to improve downward visibility but in practice weren't very useful. I imagine they would collected every bit of dirt and grit that came into the cockpit. Can't see how useful they'd be for bombing either. In level bombing, by the time the pilot saw the target through them. It would be too late to drop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thud4444 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 (edited) According to local vets and the book The Cactus Air Force those windows are to make sure the landing gear has been fully retracted. Unlike most fighters from that era, the Wildcat had manual landing gear. There was a handle on the side wall, not unlike what you find on older cars windows, that you had to manually turn over and over again to retract the gear. The faster the fighter went, the harder the gear was to retract. So you needed to retract the gear as quickly as possible. The manual had a set number of revolutions needed to retract the gear, but in the field the actual number needed was often way off. Mostly due to parts being worn out or damged during day to day operating. There are some humorous stories in the Cactus book about Wildcats getting jumped on take off. One guy claimed to have set the world record for RPMs by a human and another claimed to have slammed his throttle forward while trying to retract the gear and almost breaking the handle off its mounts. Edited December 31, 2017 by Thud4444 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thud4444 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 On 12/30/2017 at 11:18 AM, Kari Lumppio said: Hello! In the Finnish Brewster (F2A-1 / model 239) equipment list they were "bombing windows". I believe bomb aiming windows for level bombing. Cheers, Karn The Buffalo had powered landing gear. If I had to guess, I would assume that those windows are a hold over from the requirements on the older biplanes that had manual gear. I'm not sure why they were deleted on the GM built planes either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbob Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 (edited) I don't know that you'd even be able to see the wheels through those windows. The F4F-4 manual says, "Position of Wheels The crank is rotated as far as it will go in the desired direction - either to raise or lower the wheels. The wheels should then be in the desired position. A mechanical position indicator is located forward of the handcrank." Slightly after: "Warning Indicators Mechanical- Small arrow head pointer in slot on right hand shelf just forward of the handcrank." (I didn't see any mention of the lower windows.) Edited December 31, 2017 by gingerbob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thud4444 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 (edited) I didn't say they worked, thats just what they where designed for. There was a video on YouTube that showed how it all worked that I can't find anymore. But there is one that showed how the windows worked on the early F4Us still on there. It was what was "in style" in America at the time. If they where not for landing gear purposes why are they on the purely interceptor model early P-38s? Edited December 31, 2017 by Thud4444 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorfinn Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 3 hours ago, Thud4444 said: Unlike most fighters from that era, the Wildcat had manual landing gear. There was a handle on the side wall, not unlike what you find on older cars windows, that you had to manually turn over and over again to retract the gear. The faster the fighter went, the harder the gear was to retract. So you needed to retract the gear as quickly as possible. The manual had a set number of revolutions needed to retract the gear, but in the field the actual number needed was often way off. I've read accounts by veteran pilots that aviators new to the Wildcat could be easily recognized on takeoff---their a/c would have a distinctive side-to-side 'wobble' as they tried to maintain flight control while simultaneously (and awkwardly) hand-cranking the landing gear up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 Just now, thorfinn said: I've read accounts by veteran pilots that aviators new to the Wildcat could be easily recognized on takeoff---their a/c would have a distinctive side-to-side 'wobble' as they tried to maintain flight control while simultaneously (and awkwardly) hand-cranking the landing gear up. Not to mention the 'Popeye' triceps on the right arm from cranking that landing gear up and down! Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana Bell Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 (edited) Hi guys, While there were probably many uses for the windows, they were officially listed as bombing windows. Cheers, Dana Edited January 1, 2018 by Dana Bell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thud4444 Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 (edited) Where is your source on this? According to Wildcat pilots and books written where they interviewed those pilots those windows are for landing purposes. While not practical they did allow a view of the gear illustrated here by a pic from the O'Hare display. The windows on the F4U and P38 where for the same purpose. BTW there where no way to even hang bombs on an early P38. And the F4U had some kind of weird "red line" system that showed when the gear was fully retracted. I have no idea what the windows were for on the Buffalos. All these planes were designed back when retractable gear was still a brand-new innovation. According to the book "The Forked Tailed Devil" the windows where installed in the 38 because Lockheed was certain that older pilots would forget to lower the gear. Ironically according to Vought, they added the windows because of the problems the RAF was having out of the Blenheim. Again it was the style of the day. Edited January 1, 2018 by Thud4444 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tailspin Turtle Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 Good question - these downward viewing windows in Navy airplanes were introduced with the first monoplanes, the SBD, TBD, F2A, F4F, SB2A (but not the SBA), and maybe the very first SB2Cs. My guess is that they were primarily intended to somewhat make up for the reduction in downward visibility resulting from the larger wing of a monoplane (note that the SBA pilot was located well forward, almost at the leading edge of the wing). The bombing-window purpose was obvious in the TBD, because there was a crawl space forward for the bombardier to access the bomb sight that utilized the window beneath the pilot. The TBF had a similar window in the aft end of its bomb bay for level bombing. The Grumman general-arrangement drawing for the F4F, by the way, clearly shows that the pilot can't quite see the extended landing gear through the "bombing" windows. The purpose of the window on the F4U, F5F, and FL is more readily explainable. See http://thanlont.blogspot.com/2008/06/antiaircraft-bombs.html 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil.C Posted January 1, 2018 Author Share Posted January 1, 2018 Certainly some very interesting debate on the subject. Thanks to everyone who joined in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotusArenco Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 If you look at a full side on view of the aircraft and imagine a line from the pilots head through the windows, in practice I doubt the wheels would be visible. Better still play around with this: https://www.airspacemag.com/panoramas/f4f-wildcat-180954042/ Given the limited view out of those windows, I can see why they later deleted them. Mart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDriskill Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 Pure speculation on my part...! But I wonder if they might have been of some value when landing on a carrier, particularly in knowing when you’d passed over the deck edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Work In Progress Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 Was worth a guess, but as a pilot landing an F4F on a carrier it's not your business to know when you cross the deck edge. It's this guy's business. And if you want to live, you'd better be looking at him, not down past your feet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDriskill Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 Well understood by every pilot (and by me), but I was wondering, maybe not by the theoretician designing the airplane! Admittedly a lame guess on my part. The earlier discussion on “bombing windows” is, I suspect, closer to the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noelh Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 I think the windows are like many innovations in that they seemed like a good idea at the time but the reality of in service use rendered them pointless and useless. That extended to whole aircraft at times. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeronut Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 I have just short of a 1000 hours on Grob 109 motorgliders which have a window down by the pilot's feet. As a pilot can't ever recall looking through them whilst in the air, but they were useful for looking from the outside in when doing pre flight inspections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dana Bell Posted January 1, 2018 Share Posted January 1, 2018 13 hours ago, Thud4444 said: Where is your source on this? According to Wildcat pilots and books written where they interviewed those pilots those windows are for landing purposes. While not practical they did allow a view of the gear illustrated here by a pic from the O'Hare display. The windows on the F4U and P38 where for the same purpose. BTW there where no way to even hang bombs on an early P38. And the F4U had some kind of weird "red line" system that showed when the gear was fully retracted. I have no idea what the windows were for on the Buffalos. All these planes were designed back when retractable gear was still a brand-new innovation. According to the book "The Forked Tailed Devil" the windows where installed in the 38 because Lockheed was certain that older pilots would forget to lower the gear. Ironically according to Vought, they added the windows because of the problems the RAF was having out of the Blenheim. Again it was the style of the day. Hi Thud4444, My favorite secondary source is the Aircraft Pictorial book: https://www.amazon.com/Aircraft-Pictorial-No-F4F-Wildcat/dp/B007RXXGZE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1514828982&sr=8-1&keywords=dana+bell+f4f To be honest, I have a love-hate relationship with the author, but he seemed to do his homework on that one. Despite the memories of a pilot or two, it was impossible to see the landing gear from the Wildcat cockpit. With his head fully aft, the pilot had a 13-degree view of the world below him. If his vision was extended an additional 5 degrees forward, he would - at best - be able to see the aftermost tread of the tires on fully extended gear. Didn't happen because it couldn't happen... I admit that I haven't done as much work on the P-38, but I've yet to see any downward windows in that aircraft. Martin Caiden tended to play a bit loose with the facts; I suspect that in Fork-Tailed Devil he was confusing the reflective mirrors set inboard of the nacelles to check on the gear retraction/extension. I spent two years researching the Corsair at the US National Archives - every document referred to the ventral window as the bombing window. (Because of the problems with carbon monoxide leaks, there were a LOT of documents referring to that window.) Having sat in a Corsair or two, I can assure you that there was no way to see the landing gear through the bombing window. Tom Wildenberg's well researched Destined for Glory describes the Navy's mid-1930s decision to hang bombs on all its fighters to suppress the anti-aircraft guns on enemy ships, giving dive bombers and torpedo planes a better chance of hitting their targets. The bombing window gave the pilot a better view when deciding to attack. Cheers, Dana 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbob Posted January 2, 2018 Share Posted January 2, 2018 15 hours ago, Dana Bell said: To be honest, I have a love-hate relationship with the author, but he seemed to do his homework on that one. Oh, he's not so bad, just too slow getting stuff out there. Compare to Bill Gunston, for example Best wishes for the new year, Dana, bob 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now