iainpeden Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 This picture was posted by "F3" on Fighter Control and the poster, Michael, has given me permission to post it here. Brough by Iain Peden, on Flickr There are a numberof interesting points from a modelling perspective. It has the RWR fin fitted but retains high viz roundals on the fuselage and a full colour, square, fin flash. However the underwing markings are red/blue only, but the serial continues onto the outer wing panel. I have also just noticed there's no inner pylons fitted. After a bit of searching Michael and I think it's XT852 - a YF-4M. Any further thoughts would be appreciated. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabba Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 It also has the ILS aerials fitted on the fin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bentwaters81tfw Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 No missiles or ballast rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canberra kid Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 It may be a company test airframe, trying out the new bits of kit? John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 (edited) It is a YF-4M, the first FGR.2, XT852. It was retained for trials work for most of it's career by HS and BAe at Holme on Spalding Moor and then Brough. Previously it was used to pre-service trials in the 'States. Sadly it survived at West Freugh until as recently as July 2011. Edited November 20, 2017 by 71chally 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guillaume320 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 It’s difficult to tell from the picture, but unless the pilot was making a large stick input to roll to the right the exact moment the photographer took the shot, this one seems to have drooped ailerons. Strange if this the case, as drooping ailerons were a feature of the F-4K/FG.1, not the F-4M/FGR.2.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 hour ago, guillaume320 said: It’s difficult to tell from the picture, but unless the pilot was making a large stick input to roll to the right the exact moment the photographer took the shot, this one seems to have drooped ailerons. Strange if this the case, as drooping ailerons were a feature of the F-4K/FG.1, not the F-4M/FGR.2.... Exactly what I was going to say. drooped ailerons with flaps down would be a unique visual clue to an FG1 as the (production) FGR2 did not have drooping ailerons. The definition of the photo isn't great so it is difficult to tell if the extension scissor link is hiding there between the nose wheels or not but the lights on the nose gear door would also indicate an FG1. It is possible the prototype FGR2 had more in common with the FG1 though. Duncan B 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 The prototype FGR.2 did have several features in common with the FG.1 though the noseleg was standard. I hadn't heard the drooping ailerons were one of these features, but I did get told some time ago that it had folding wings FG.1 style, though again I have not seen any direct evidence of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 The two YF-4 M / FGR.2s did have the carrier style nose wheel door. I have seen a pic of XT893 with drooped ailerons, but it was in a dismantled state at St Athan. The picture above looks like it could have been taken at a display, note everthing down, even airbrakes, so perhaps it was making a slow commanded roll at the point the picture was taken. My understanding is that FGR.2s could fold their wings, but didn't need to in service, there are certainly pics of FGR.2s with wings folded in their earlier days of service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhino Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 The difference between FG.1 and FGR.2 wing folds as I understand it, is the FG.1 can be powered from the cockpit, while the FGR.2 is manual. The FGR.2 also has a pop out warning to show it is unlocked. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabba Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Just now, Rhino said: The difference between FG.1 and FGR.2 wing folds as I understand it, is the FG.1 can be powered from the cockpit, while the FGR.2 is manual. The FGR.2 also has a pop out warning to show it is unlocked. Correct. Having worked on Phantoms at St Athan, although I was on a FGR2 team I am sure that one time we had one that had powered wings. Trying to stop hydraulic power is not recommended as I held on to the outer wing and letting go before I was thrown over it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
At Sea Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1/72 Airfix kit plus RAM Models early British Phantom's... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Cornes Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 My thought was an ex FAA FG1 simply because of the red paint exposed by the slats and double extension nose leg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 6 hours ago, Jabba said: Correct. Having worked on Phantoms at St Athan, although I was on a FGR2 team I am sure that one time we had one that had powered wings. Trying to stop hydraulic power is not recommended as I held on to the outer wing and letting go before I was thrown over it. Coincidentally I only ever worked on FG1's but have a distinct memory of manually folding wings on at least one Phantom. It could be that it was during my Q course at Coningsby but my memory tells me that one of the prototypes did eventually make it into service and it was this one that had manual wing fold, can anyone confirm this or is my memory playing tricks on me. All the Phantoms had indicator pins for the wing locks, all our Phantoms had red painted areas inside the moveable sections (to stop the Sooties getting stuck in bits during ground runs ). All the squadrons would fold the wings when putting the aircraft to bed to save room in the hangers. Duncan B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stever219 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 An RAF Germany FGR 2 was lost after taking off with the wings spread but not locked. As the jet lifted off the aerodynamic loads caused the outer panels to fold, thereby moving the centre of lift forward relative to the venture of gravity. The aeroplane pitched up and eventually stalled but fortunately the crew were able to eject and survived. One factor that was identified during the investigation was that the inch-long indicator pin, although painted red, could be missed during a walk-round by an aviator of even slightly-smaller-than-average stature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Headroom Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Does the person who took the photos have any other shots in the sequence which may shed some clues? Trevor ps I’m no expert but that nose wheel door is more FGR.2 than FG.1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sloegin57 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 8 hours ago, Rhino said: The difference between FG.1 and FGR.2 wing folds as I understand it, is the FG.1 can be powered from the cockpit, while the FGR.2 is manual. The FGR.2 also has a pop out warning to show it is unlocked. The FG.1 also had pop out warning rods out by the outboard hinge line Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sloegin57 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 hour ago, Duncan B said: Coincidentally I only ever worked on FG1's but have a distinct memory of manually folding wings on at least one Phantom. It could be that it was during my Q course at Coningsby but my memory tells me that one of the prototypes did eventually make it into service and it was this one that had manual wing fold, can anyone confirm this or is my memory playing tricks on me. Duncan B Duncan - were you at Leuchars when 43 had a couple of FGR.2's ? The earliest FG.1 to enter service was XT598 which was brought up to full service standard and issued to Tremblers 4/78 as E and the sqdns first FG.1. Didn't last long as it crashed into St Andrews bay in November the same year. Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 9 hours ago, Max Headroom said: ps I’m no expert but that nose wheel door is more FGR.2 than FG.1? Definitely FG.1 style door, XT852 retained it until scrapped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 (edited) 10 hours ago, Duncan B said: All the Phantoms had indicator pins for the wing locks... Duncan B Is this it? I realise that ordinarily it would be painted red and with the wings spread it would be retracted, but it is a preserved aircraft, Pic courtesy of Britmodeller, Graham Platt & Julien. Edited November 22, 2017 by 71chally 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 10 hours ago, sloegin57 said: Duncan - were you at Leuchars when 43 had a couple of FGR.2's ? The earliest FG.1 to enter service was XT598 which was brought up to full service standard and issued to Tremblers 4/78 as E and the sqdns first FG.1. Didn't last long as it crashed into St Andrews bay in November the same year. Dennis Hi Dennis This would have been 1982-85ish but I have a strong memory of myself and John Porcelli taking turns at winding the wings up with a speed brace and a lot of swearing while others looked on an laughed (as they do). If it was in the Hanger for something minor I suppose I wouldn't necessarily have noticed it was an FGR2 or more likely remember. That would certainly explain it. Duncan B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 11 hours ago, Max Headroom said: Does the person who took the photos have any other shots in the sequence which may shed some clues? Trevor ps I’m no expert but that nose wheel door is more FGR.2 than FG.1? You can see the coloured 'Traffic lights' with the red light lit (indicating hook down?), the FGR2 didn't have them, only white landing lights. 17 minutes ago, 71chally said: Is this it? I realise that ordinarily it would be painted red and with the wings spread it would be retracted, but it is a preserved aircraft, Pic courtesy of Britmodeller, Graham Platt & Julien. Yes that's the locking pin indicator, usually painted a fetching dayglo sort of red. Duncan B 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Headroom Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 @71chally and @Duncan B I thought it was the other way around. (I told you I wasn’t an expert) Trevor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iainpeden Posted November 22, 2017 Author Share Posted November 22, 2017 Does anybody know if the upper wing markings included the white ring or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabba Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 9 hours ago, 71chally said: Is this it? I realise that ordinarily it would be painted red and with the wings spread it would be retracted, but it is a preserved aircraft, Pic courtesy of Britmodeller, Graham Platt & Julien. We used to apply Orange paint at St Athan, but after the first time that the pins were moved down to show that the wings were locked, the paint was removed. So the picture above is reasonably accurate. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now