Richard E Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Although they would probably contribute to a rather sluggish performance, would the FAA's Phantom FG Mk.1's inboard pylons be rated to carry a 2,000 lb payload? I have an idea for an Airfix Phantom finished in a "WHIF" scheme carrying a pair of GBU-24 2,000 pound Paveway Laser Guided Bombs on its inboard pylons........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bentwaters81tfw Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 An F-4 would carry 3 x 500 lb bombs on a TER plus 2 Sidewinders on the inboard pylon, so weightwise...yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_c67 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 According to Mr Chant's "Encyclopaedia of Modern Aircraft armament" they were rated to 3,500lbs. That said, I have noticed the odd error in the book so you may wanna take that with a pinch of salt. Then again, it is a Whif... 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phone Phixer Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 I know your plan is a WHIF, so this is a bit subjective. The British Phantoms used the US Navy type pylons. They were just lumps of metal with no internal ERU to load stores onto (that design was for the USAF Phantoms). To load any store a MWA (multiple weapons adapter) had to be bolted to the pylon. Then a CBTE (carrier bomb triple ejector) was fitted. Finally the required bomb(s) or rocket pods were loaded to the CBTE. This would make the 2,000lb Paveways a bit low to the ground. WHIF though, so ..........meh! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 (edited) 8 hours ago, Phone Phixer said: I know your plan is a WHIF, so this is a bit subjective. The British Phantoms used the US Navy type pylons. They were just lumps of metal with no internal ERU to load stores onto (that design was for the USAF Phantoms). To load any store a MWA (multiple weapons adapter) had to be bolted to the pylon. Then a CBTE (carrier bomb triple ejector) was fitted. Finally the required bomb(s) or rocket pods were loaded to the CBTE. Hi, Phne Phixer, I have read that the "Navy pylon" was specifically designed to carry a Sparrow and that it could carry it straight, without any adaptor, launcher or rail added (which would be needed to carry anything else), but that would contradict your information. Fernando Edited October 6, 2017 by Fernando Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canberra kid Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 I don't know if this helps at all? John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard E Posted October 6, 2017 Author Share Posted October 6, 2017 Gentlemen Thank you, some very useful information - all I need now is some ability and time. @Phone Phixer as part of the aircraft's proposed upgrade programme I'll simply "WHIF" updated pylons with built in weapons adaptors. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phone Phixer Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 15 hours ago, Fernando said: Hi, Phne Phixer, I have read that the "Navy pylon" was specifically designed to carry a Sparrow and that it could carry it straight, without any adaptor, launcher or rail added (which would be needed to carry anything else), but that would contradict your information. Fernando Hi Fernando. Yes, I have read of the ability for Aim 7 Sparrows to be fitted directly on the navy pylons. They were rail launched rather than ejection launched. British Phantoms never used this though, it was not a recognised load. Sparrows and the later Skyflash were only loaded onto the 4 Aero 7a launchers recessed in the fuselage underside. In the air defence fit, inboard pylons had the Aim 9 Sidewinders loaded onto the Lau 7a launchers bolted to the side. No ground attack weapons could be loaded without the sequence I put in my above post. Rob. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exdraken Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 They vould always have adapted USAF pylons I guess! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iainpeden Posted October 7, 2017 Share Posted October 7, 2017 If it's A WHIF you can, within reason, do what you like. Which explains the wingtip mounted sparrows I have on my USAF EE Lightning F.6. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverkite Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 two rocket pods and a Sidewinder would be possible for RN Phantoms? Luigi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XV107 Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 On 10/6/2017 at 10:33 AM, Fernando said: Hi, Phne Phixer, I have read that the "Navy pylon" was specifically designed to carry a Sparrow and that it could carry it straight, without any adaptor, launcher or rail added (which would be needed to carry anything else), but that would contradict your information. Fernando Perhaps of interest? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsairfoxfouruncle Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Great film Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
At Sea Posted October 21, 2017 Share Posted October 21, 2017 Loved it. Great film and a really interesting look at that era of technology. I just remember using TRACOR in the early days of my career, before GPS became a standard fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now