Courageous Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 55 minutes ago, perdu said: I've just done a comparative on the Frog, Matchbox and the beautiful CMR upper fuselages None of them actually fit the Falcon canopy, as you say James it is far too wide at the spine end I have the inner frame issue sorted James, its pretty well all inside at the arch I'm off into the fridge to see if I can get some decent photos for Mr B to reference from (Giorgio, I ought to have used 'refer to' above but as Ced wants a reference discourse I decided to mangulate my English again) I don't see Airfix in that lot 'cos I 'might' have a Falcon canopy (it wasn't in a packet when I got it) and I have an Airfix Bucc Better look at the canopy fit tonight. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 I do not have an Airfix one to compare with Frog with Falcon here The Falcon one was cut to suit my Matchbox one Matchbox one with Falcon CMR with Falcon It seems to me that the Lesney one was moulded a tad slimmer This interested me a bit Obviously not a direct fit but confirms for that Frog and CMR have a similar song sheet Measured the spines on each of them 0.459 0.401 0.403 Frog is wider and the Falcon fits it like a glove Seen here on the Frog one A very snug fit 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamden Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Your attention to detail never fails to impress me! Love watching you beat these old moulds into or better than the modern shake and bake Roger 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giemme Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 4 hours ago, perdu said: I'm off into the fridge to see if I can get some decent photos for Mr B to reference from (Giorgio, I ought to have used 'refer to' above but as Ced wants a reference discourse I decided to mangulate my English again) It was perfectly intelligible to me, though - but thanks anyway Looking forward to how this canopy saga ends Ciao 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Even from the photos the Frog one look nearer to me to the original - how often do we hear that! The Matchbox spine seems to reduce the taper and get too parallel at the fwd end That's kinda why I mentioned this earlier, I would hate you to modify the canopy to find that the issue is with the kit spine. Nice to have the luxury of seeing these comparisons, would love to see a thread on just comparing 72nd Bucc kits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 (edited) The canopy mod James? Well it is something I usually do anyway so the work inside is visible otherwise there's no point to doing the work inside Vis: my Catalina, lots of stuff inside ALL OF IT invisible, I need to rationalise this henceforth I have bulked out the forward spine on the Matchbox one to allow for an opened canopy, Massimo is doing the same moulding, you can tell the kit canopy is supposed to locate down inside a step on the front spine end I filled the step on mine for appearances sake Plan A is to go ahead with the canopy changes I have already put in motion We discussed an exposé of plunge moulding for Ceb and yourself I recall I start with the raw materials, here we have 0.06mm actetate sheet from the local Artists supply shop cut down from A4 into handleable sizes Posing with the moulding buck (here made from a VERY ancient Matchbox canopy) that has been filled with green stuff malleable putty and before it set I inserted a stem with which to grip it in the vice I has had its frame lines removed with a selection of files and then polished to a shine with Nail Bar type buffer blocks Like these, four different surfaces starting with a hard grit filing surface then graduating through to Shine The file surface has Smooth on its opposite face and I usually use them in the order FILE, SMOOTH, BUFF and POLISH Makes a lovely shiny surface in no time The plunge/pull moulding technique needs heat to transform the acetate, I use one of these But frankly they aren't much cop as a heat source, I prefer a proper candle for decent warming ups Still we have what we have, tomorrow I intend having proper jobs I place the upright stem in my bench vice and set up the candle (usually atop the end of one of the buffing polishing blocks for a bit of height) Here I am checking the amount of acetate I have to handle, I do not want burnt hands do I? This should do I take a grip on the ends of the sheet and after holding it over the heat source I pull it firmly down over the moulding buck Thus The left side didn't take deeply enough due to the poor heat source but as I have a need for a separate front and back 'cos the Bucc is going to be displayed with its canopy slid back therefore I moulded a different front piece to the back piece, this will all depend on getting the straight cuts lined up proper, see? This one had distortion caused by letting the acetate burn in the flame but its front, screen area pulled in nicely so that is part one I was able to pull a nice rear end just ripe for trimming back This is the screen moulding for trimming|? \/ \/ \/ Back end Well as usual my pictures didn't help much, tomorrow I intend using a decent candle, I can show you better things... I hopes Edited February 22, 2018 by perdu 12 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hairystick Posted February 21, 2018 Share Posted February 21, 2018 Most excellent work and an informative post! Would a fearsome hairdryer work? A heatgun would be the solution but only if really controllable temperature wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 21, 2018 Author Share Posted February 21, 2018 The problem with using a hairdryer (or my gas blow lamp in the garage) is having more gadgetry to manipulate at the same time as the acetate A decent heat source just sitting reliably hot will allow the operator (me or maybe YOU) to control the pulling and the moving about The essence of the technique is getting as much of the available surface softened enough to pull down into the mould buck It would be possible if you went the Alan Hall route with a top and bottom frame to mount the sheet on however, you might like to try it 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CedB Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Thanks Bill, that’s great and very clear (pun) but for me the problem is how you mould the buck? Let’s say you have a canopy that’s got nice framing but it’s too wide and too thick. If you fill the part with stuff, don’t you end up with a buck that’s too narrow? With no frames? Some pictures of how you make the Buck buck (sounds like a chicken, quick, call KFC!) would be very informative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hairystick Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 On 2/21/2018 at 3:46 PM, perdu said: The problem with using a hairdryer (or my gas blow lamp in the garage) is having more gadgetry to manipulate at the same time as the acetate A decent heat source just sitting reliably hot will allow the operator (me or maybe YOU) to control the pulling and the moving about At times I'd be challenged operating a candle... I was thinking about the heat guns we had at work. Makita type that can sit on their end so the heat goes straight upwards. Just put onto a low heat setting and move the acetate around until soft? It sounds as if holding onto a heat source (gas torch or whatever) makes the job far more involved and I appreciate the method you have shown us. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 22, 2018 Author Share Posted February 22, 2018 I am trying desperately not to become a tooliac, getting enough grief round here just for having THIS hobby, but that Makita sounds good It is the regularity of the heat source that makes the operation possible after all Ced, are we at cross purposes here? I do not make the mould from the insides of the canopy which would be too small as you suggest I use the packing material to solidify the kit part (Unless I am making an entirely new piece in a prototype manner) and then I convert the kit's canopy by reducing or in this case by removing completely the centre framing and if I think it necessary to make more drastic 'modifications' I introduce the part to sihrsc before polishing the beauty back into it The kit part most usually becomes the mould to work with When I built the Scout the Milliput block it filled the canopy unit with came out under duress but that turned out to give me a buck exactly the size the model needed (Airfix had been a little generous with the kit part without making the back windows big enough, the new buck was exactly right) So to recap make or adapt the buck from the kit bit allowing for thickness of materials adapt the size to suit (most packaging materials acetate is thin enough to stretch without making grossly oversize clear parts) fit a stick of some sort to allow remote handling fix in a vice (or hole in the workbench, don't laugh) grip acetate tightly at the sides and heat it up mould new part and trim it to fit sorted! 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courageous Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 9 hours ago, perdu said: Well it is something I usually do anyway so the work inside is visible otherwise there's no point to doing the work inside Vis: my Catalina, lots of stuff inside ALL OF IT invisible, I need to rationalise this henceforth Great demo on canopy molding 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giemme Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 3 hours ago, hairystick said: I was thinking about the heat guns we had at work. Makita type that can sit on their end so the heat goes straight upwards. Just put onto a low heat setting and move the acetate around until soft? That's exactly what I use, a heat gun that can seat on its end. Mine has three heat levels (I to III), I use it on II. And I use thermal gloves to handle the acetate (or APET or PS) cutout. Ciao 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianMF Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 On 12/02/2018 at 23:36, 71chally said: Bill, if it's detail that you are after, In the Pathe news video, is that wood grain on the cockpit cover at 0:47 in?? Oh and nice modelling by the way Regards, Adrian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CedB Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 hour ago, perdu said: I use the packing material to solidify the kit part (Unless I am making an entirely new piece in a prototype manner) and then I convert the kit's canopy by reducing or in this case by removing completely the centre framing and if I think it necessary to make more drastic 'modifications' I introduce the part to sihrsc before polishing the beauty back into it The kit part most usually becomes the mould to work with Thanks Bill - that's the process I was missing. Now I have 'the set' I can bookmark it for later use. Ta matey, great stuff. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Bill, you really make this stuff look so simple, but I bet that there are years of experience behind this! I think that you may have misunderstood an earlier post, I wasn't doubting the idea of having a nice clear acetate canopy, but whether or not it was the Falcon canopy or the kit spine that was at fault - you don't want to discard the good bit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 22, 2018 Author Share Posted February 22, 2018 I did think you meant that James, not that I needed to dump a useable piece The Matchbox canopy is wrong in several directions and dimensions The 'hump' at the front is too high and needs rounding off nicely and of course the external middle frame is both tangible and running in quite the wrong direction And to cap it the spine was engineered for the kit canopy not for the real shape we need All is fixable, the hump is slowly disappearing from the buck this after noon whilst I play with another of my Bucc bodies Just hacking out the Frog bomb bay so I can fit the camera pack, can't waste that 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Have you got a resin camera pack, or are you making one? I have an illustration of it somewhere if you need more info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 22, 2018 Author Share Posted February 22, 2018 On the bench as we speaks, thanks to Richard's generosity Which reminds me I have lots of goodies that need returning home as soon as, must get repacking 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 22, 2018 Author Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) Well I did decide to pop the Froggy in too, this is going to be an S1 too, thanks to Brian's early support The breakdown is different to the Lesney Product, being more like the Airfix one I remember from back along a long long while There is room for improvement all over but I intend this one to be down and dirty quick Made some of the framework for inside the wheel wells and decided to make the Gyron Junior Jet Pipes from old and discarded Phantom gun packs which come in dimensionally close to the ones I made for the Matchbox one Wheel bay roof twice Jet pipes And vestigial internal walls for the engine mount frames to be affixed to Just visible inside the tank bay That is that for tonight, beer's on now Bar's open and I don't do sharps with beers Edited February 22, 2018 by perdu 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
giemme Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 You're not kidding around here Bill, are you? and Ciao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massimo Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 (edited) Beer o'clock isn't it? I tried once to shape a canopy with a similar process, but with no vice to hold the master!!! What an idiot!!! (me!) I see you're starting a parallel build? That's the Frog kit, isn't it' ? Good start with the wheel bays' detail! So how many have you got in mind and what colour will they be? Edited February 22, 2018 by massimo2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 22, 2018 Author Share Posted February 22, 2018 Hi Massimo, beertaps opened around 2100 GMT so no more cutting or sticking Both of these are going to be S1s so I need to make two more MB4s which will take all of thirty minutes He He Working quickly on the engine and wheel bay innards shouldnt take too long and I might just copy the cockpit on the other one for quickness I need to check out pylon positions but the Frog one does at least have vortex generators, yippeee And of course the Falcon canopy will fit like a glove My other Matchbox will be an S2 as nature intended, with just a few minor alterations to the wheels and legs Oh yes and a cockpit and nose wheel bay Night all ciao 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huvut76g7gbbui7 Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 7 hours ago, perdu said: On the bench as we speaks, thanks to Richard's generosity Wait until he sees the invoice Did you see my Buccaneer here ? Scroll down page 8. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted February 22, 2018 Author Share Posted February 22, 2018 O U C H ! ! ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now