Welcome to Britmodeller.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

  • Announcements

    • Mike

      PhotoBucket are no longer permitting 3rd party hosting   01/07/17

      As most of you are now painfully aware, Photobucket (PB) are stopping/have stopped allowing their members to link their accumulated years of photos into forums and the like, which they call 3rd party linking.  You can give them a non-refundable $399 a year to allow links, but I doubt that many will be rushing to take them up on that offer.  If you've previously paid them for the Pro account, it looks like you've got until your renewal to find another place to host your files, but you too will be subject to this ban unless you fork over a lot of cash.   PB seem to be making a concerted move to another type of customer, having been the butt of much displeasure over the years of a constantly worsening user interface, sloth and advertising pop-ups, with the result that they clearly don't give a hoot about the free members anymore.  If you don't have web space included in your internet package, you need to start looking for another photo host, but choose carefully, as some may follow suit and ditch their "free" members at some point.  The lesson there is keep local backups on your hard drive of everything you upload, so you can walk away if the same thing happens.   There's a thread on the subject here, so please use that to curse them, look for solutions or generall grouse about their mental capacity.   Not a nice situation for the forum users that hosted all their photos there, and there will now be a host of useless threads that relied heavily on photos from PB, but as there's not much we can do other than petition for a more equitable solution, I suggest we make the best of what we have and move on.  One thing is for certain.  It won't win them any friends, but they may not care at this point.    Mike.
Beard

AZ Fulmar

36 posts in this topic
5 hours ago, Seahawk said:

To me it seems an odd choice of subject in commercial terms.  The Fulmar is hardly the best known of aircraft and much of the enthusiast market will have been creamed off by the very nice Special Hobby kit, not to mention the earlier Vista/Airfix one.  If AZ wanted to do something for FAA enthusiasts, how about something unkitted in injection like a Stinson Reliant?  Or, what the world is really waiting for, a state-of-the-art Blackburn Shark TT.III?  Or even a Harvard IIb?

 

It was however, the FAA's highest scoring fighter of WW2 and I think a perfect subject for a manufacturer less mainstream than the likes of Revell etc but I think it would also be a good subject for Airfix. Either way it'll still be interesting to see how it compares to others.

 

thanks

Mike

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This KP kit is the ex- Vista kit.

 

Cheers

Libor

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem with that, did it come with Mk II bits or am I mistaken in that, I'm thinking some nice new schemes.

Steve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only difference, IIRC, between the I and II is the tropical intake filters on the II, and they are in the Vista kit.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Special Hobby kit is very nice. It looks very 'right'. 

 

I'm struggling to believe that AZ would do yet another rebox of the Vista kit? Is that what it really is? It's also been reboxed and marketed at an extremely low price by MisterCraft very recently (2015):

 

https://www.scalemates.com/kits/974728-mistercraft-d-217-fairey-fulmar-mk-i-ii

 

I bought one last year for the equal of around £5 as the basis for a conversion to a Fairey P4/34:

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20070927075433/http://www.historicaircraft.org/British-Aircraft/pages/Fairey-P4.html

 

(My grandfather left me a pre WWII postcard with the exact linked photograph above on it, interestingly, the caption says '....Fairey Battle' :D. Ministry of disinformation?)

 

Can anyone else confirm that this AZ really is another Vista rebox?

 

I love the Fulmar but suspect I've bought enough for several lifetimes via Vista and SH. I might not be alone in that, 

 

Both Special Hobby and Pavlz Firefly Mk 1 kits are quite thin on the ground. The FROG and reboxes/bags are in abundance, but a Firefly Mk 1, including the same options in one box as the Pavla/Octopus kit (FR. 1, T. 1, TT. 1 in 1/72, but (in contrast to the Pavla) a nice build, would be really very nice.

 

The Modelimex website has an interesting summary of AZ 'future releases' listed as 'in prepare'. I'm not sure how many we'll see, but some are really fascinating subjects.

 

I must revisit the AZ thread. Thanks for posting this Simon (Beard).

 

TonyT

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Vista kit is IMHO quite nice but is seriously lacking on details and would benefit from a new cockpit and wheel wells. Most other details are very basic and need refining

Shapewise doesn't look too bad, although lacks the offset vertical stabilizer of the real aircraft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person who'll know the origin is Jan Polc. I'll ask him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the ex- Vista tooling indeed with set of resin wheels and some etched bits. The differences between MkI and II as the larger radiator hausing for instance and others, are obviously not addressed.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Vista radiator housing looks to have wide enough sides to cope with trimming in either direction for a Mk.I or Mk.II, though actually trying that may change my opinion!  Answering one other point above, the exhausts come as separate parts fitting into a slot, so it shouldn't be too difficult to adjust the height on each side.  The Revell instructions I have omit the exhausts anyway and show fitting the filters in their place.

 

My other Fulmar is a Pegasus...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a Smer boxing recently, it looks like a nice sound kit. SH one is more detailed but I think the Vista kit can still hold its own especially if they add a few goodies.

 

Colin

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now