Tony Whittingham Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Hello All, I know it is possible to have a 3 blade propeller on a Typhoon with the Tempest tailplane, but I am wondering if the reverse is true. Is it possible to have a 4 blade prop on an airframe with the small (Typhoon) tailplane? There are at least 2 Car door Typhoons with 4 blade props, and I am wondering if the Tempest tail was a necessary modification for a Typhoon to be fitted with the 4 blade propeller? Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Wilson Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 I believe that the larger tailplanes were a requirement for the 4 bladed prop. Others may know more though. Stuart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Apart from development aircraft, which presumably were the examples you mention, the large tailplane was a requirement for the 4-blade prop. The extra blade was destabilising, effectively adding area forward of the cg/aerodynamic centre. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Thomas Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 A Typhoon with a 4-blader cannot have been too much of a problem with the small tailplane as trials with this configuration took place as early as November 1941. One (R7577) was delivered to 56 Sqn, just weeks after they received their first Typhoon, albeit just for trial. 266 Sqn had a handful the following year for further trials. Unfortunately photos of these have never surfaced The photos usually seen are of JP752, which was on trial with Hawker in Sept 43, R8943 force landed on trials with De Havilland (propellors) in March 1944, and R8803 which also force landed in September 1944 on Napier trials. However, no production Typhoons were delivered with the 4-blader/small tailplane combination and none saw operational service use. As far as I know .... CT 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 There's always a difference between what a test pilot can be expected to handle, and the flying qualities that can be cleared for an average service pilot. Sometimes this difference only appears during early trials. A less-stable aircraft may be flyable but a poor weapon platform. If a pilot has to give a lot of his attention just to flying the aircraft, he has less available for combat awareness. It's perhaps worth remembering that many WW1 types - notably the Sopwith Camel - would have had severe difficulties in being accepted under later rules, yet it went on to become a very successful fighter. The cost was the lives of a great many inexperienced pilots in training, and indeed later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now