Welcome to Britmodeller.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

  • Announcements

    • Mike

      PhotoBucket are no longer permitting 3rd party hosting   01/07/17

      As most of you are now painfully aware, Photobucket (PB) are stopping/have stopped allowing their members to link their accumulated years of photos into forums and the like, which they call 3rd party linking.  You can give them a non-refundable $399 a year to allow links, but I doubt that many will be rushing to take them up on that offer.  If you've previously paid them for the Pro account, it looks like you've got until your renewal to find another place to host your files, but you too will be subject to this ban unless you fork over a lot of cash.   PB seem to be making a concerted move to another type of customer, having been the butt of much displeasure over the years of a constantly worsening user interface, sloth and advertising pop-ups, with the result that they clearly don't give a hoot about the free members anymore.  If you don't have web space included in your internet package, you need to start looking for another photo host, but choose carefully, as some may follow suit and ditch their "free" members at some point.  The lesson there is keep local backups on your hard drive of everything you upload, so you can walk away if the same thing happens.   There's a thread on the subject here, so please use that to curse them, look for solutions or generall grouse about their mental capacity.   Not a nice situation for the forum users that hosted all their photos there, and there will now be a host of useless threads that relied heavily on photos from PB, but as there's not much we can do other than petition for a more equitable solution, I suggest we make the best of what we have and move on.  One thing is for certain.  It won't win them any friends, but they may not care at this point.    Mike.
RidgeRunner

Emhar FJ-4 Fury 1/72

33 posts in this topic

Hi all,

 

As quick post of my completed Fury.

 

It has taken me a while and has been a pig to build, as those of you who have tried it will know. It is so fragile in places! But, of course, it is the only option in gentlemen's scale. I got the markings from a small shot of her in Steve Ginter's book and home printed them.  I added a Pavla cockpit set and tail pipe. The only other addition was a set of canopy rails from Plastruct square rod.I started by attempting the machine depicted in the Print Scale set but gave up as they are atrocious and too large. So I went for a sister ship that had a slight different dayglo pattern on the wings. So she is a machine that was based at Glynco. I had to scribe the panels - my first attempt ever! Weathered with Flory Dirt. All paints are Humbrol enamel.

 

fury1

 

Words of warning?

 

1. if you go for the Pavla set the canopy is out of scale and too large. I kept the front end from the kit and added the rear sliding portion from the Pavla. Not the best but hey ho!

2. the undercarriage legs are so, so fragile. For the nose gear I set the leg in a small block of sprue and then added the supporting strut from Plastruct round .8mm rod.

3. the wheels are from a F-86H (Special Hobby). Not completely accurate but better than the flimsy kit option.

4. change the nosewheel light within the door to the opposite side and at the bottom 

5. open up the intake fully. I then used a modified  inlet duct from a Heller F-86 to give it depth.

 

Not my best.

 

Martin

 

 

Edited by RidgeRunner
adding comment re intake and scribing
35 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at her again I might remove that Pavla canopy and use the original which is, at least, the right size! ;)

 

Martin

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it. You've done a good job on it. I bought that kit when it first came out. I hate to think how long ago that was. But I do remember that it was a difficult build. 

The FJ 4 is a handsome beast that deserves a modern kit.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Noel. It has given me nightmares! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent model. Nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not super-smart on the FJ-4, but i had no idea about the scoop on the leading edge of the flap, or the roll spoilers. Never seen an innovation like that on a jet before.

 

I too was puzzled by what seemed like a lot of contradictory info on the FJ-4 drawings. Glad to learn that's been cleared up.

 

-d-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful looking Fury, Martin.

 

Nice choice of paint scheme. The kit undercarriage really deserves a more robust aftermarket solution...

 

-d-

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

the scoop on the leading edge of the flap, or the roll spoilers

 

You'll have to explain as I'm not sure what you mean.... Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, RidgeRunner said:

 

You'll have to explain as I'm not sure what you mean.... Thanks

See the link I posted above. The scoop is on the underside of the wing and deflects air into the slot between the wing and the leading edge of the flap. The roll spoilers are on the top of the flaps near their leading edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ah ha, thanks! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done on a pretty awful kit. It isn't the only kit around - I believe Matchbox did one but I've no idea what it was like

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great build....but your comments caused mine to be buried a little deeper in the stash, far, far way from the temptation to build it.

 

Greg in Oklahoma

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful model.

As i know what was in the box on the beginning, what you done deserve applause.

Regards, Djordje

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A truly creditable build of a kit from the 1/72 Ancien Régime. Such builds give us all hope!

 

Will

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Superb build. I have this and on the strength of fondling the plastic a few times decided to get the Rareplanes vac version as I figured it would not be any harder to build and may have the edge in accuracy.

 

3 hours ago, John R said:

Well done on a pretty awful kit. It isn't the only kit around - I believe Matchbox did one but I've no idea what it was like

John

 

Matchbox kit is 1/48. I did read an internet rumour that the Emhar kit was going to be issued by Matchbox but the latter went bust in the interim. There is something Matchbox-ish about the spruce breakdown.

 

pat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For completeness, there is also the 1/72 Merlin Models FJ-4B: Low-pressure injection molded fuselage parts, white-metal landing gear and cockpit tub/seat, and decals.The multi-view drawing that accompanies the M is much more accurate than the parts, particularly the fuselage.   It may be that mine came with a cast canopy meant for another kit, since it is too wide by 1/4 inch; the best that can be said for it is that it hasn't yellowed, which alas can't be said for the Rareplanes FJ-4 (it is otherwise the best of the three, albeit a vacuform).

 

Aeroclub produced an FJ-4 canopy and separately white-metal landing gear. I don't know if either is still available and haven't tried to build a kit with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are all too kind :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a real little stunner Martin, love the paint scheme!

 

Mine has been lurking somewhere near the top of the to-do pile for a while now, so I appreciate the heads up on the undercarriage issues.

 

Cracking Fury!

 

Keith

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you've done a cracking job on her Martin looks superb, and I know it's not a great kit to start with!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent job and a very striking colour scheme! I too once had this kit; it doesn't sound like I should I replace it anytime soon.

 

Regards,

 

Jason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Martin,

That is very-very eye-catching model! And a great job done from a difficult kit!

And I join the idea that Furies deserve a bit better treatment in 1/72 by kit-makers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sidewinder,

Ditto what they all said! A real bow-wow of a kit, but you have done an outstanding job and I love the choice of scheme! Maybe Meng Models or Sword will get around to this one as well as  an FJ-2/3 , as I don't hold much hope that Special Hobby will ever come out with the one they have listed for a few years, now!

After seeing yours, I just put my Emhar kit  farther back on my shelf!

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now