Mark4700 Posted July 1, 2017 Share Posted July 1, 2017 This is just incredible. Literally riveting stuff. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 Thanks Mark and Aerofix and Kirk , I appreciate Your opinions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 3, 2017 Author Share Posted July 3, 2017 (edited) Tiny update ... Edited July 3, 2017 by Vitaliy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 4, 2017 Author Share Posted July 4, 2017 And all of a sudden I wanted to like Welding seams It seems that it turned out its easy... Resalts - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 8, 2017 Author Share Posted July 8, 2017 Added drain screws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 8, 2017 Author Share Posted July 8, 2017 Added a flap for pipes, added fastening elements to the pylon ... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 13, 2017 Author Share Posted July 13, 2017 He finished with the mechanisms, removed the thickness on the stabilizers. A pylon and a fuel tank are ready ... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FZ6 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 (edited) This is a great build with some lovely detail work. I specifically like the work you've done on the engine. As you're working on the drop tanks at the moment this photo I took might be of use as it shows the vents at the back in more detail. Hope is of some use to you. Harrier Walkaround 09 by Mark Maclean, on Flickr Keep up the good work... Mark Edited July 15, 2017 by FZ6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 15, 2017 Author Share Posted July 15, 2017 Thank you for your attention Mark ! The fuel tank is glued and this element will be problematic to make Detailing is enough and so full See you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 15, 2017 Author Share Posted July 15, 2017 my friends , help me please , how to rebuild 65%lerx in 100% ??? thaks for helps ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xffw45343tg Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 2 hours ago, Vitaliy said: My friends, help me please: how to rebuild 65% lerx into 100%? Thanks for help ! There's a challenge that really isn't worth rising to. There are a number of comparatively cheap after market items such as those by Heritage Aviation and Alley Cat. Whilst I don't doubt that you could re-create the shape, doing so in a way that it totally symmetrical will be pretty hard, even for someone of your impressive skills. Alternatively, post a request in the "wanted" section; Hasegawa/Revell AV-8B+ models come with 100% and perhaps someone will swap (not me alas - I much prefer the look of the 100%! ) Kirk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 I prefer much too 100%LERX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 Another request , to you my friends !!! PLEASE HELP TO IDENTIFY THESE BIRDS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 17, 2017 Author Share Posted July 17, 2017 Last photo №82 ZG511 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 17, 2017 Author Share Posted July 17, 2017 Began LERX... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 17, 2017 Author Share Posted July 17, 2017 Some redone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex-FAAWAFU Posted July 17, 2017 Share Posted July 17, 2017 (edited) On 17/03/2017 at 1:34 PM, Kirk said: The only Harrier thing that I've ever seen to confuse this is the tail marking of Sea Harriers that were assigned to "700A Squadron". The big red "A" on the tail of these has nothing to do with the engine or aircraft type. The A on the tail of 700's Sea Harriers (FRS1s, so a very different aircraft to the one you are modelling so beautifully, Vitaly) was a Fleet Air Arm joke - a reference to the Omega mark on 892 NAS Phantoms a few years before. The 892 Omega had no connection to the squadron crest, but was to denote that they were (as they thought at the time) the Navy's last ever fixed-wing carrier squadron. 700 NAS was the Intensive Flying Trials Unit (700 Squadron has always had that role since the late-1950s, usually with a letter suffix to denite the type; 700P Phantom, 700L Lynx, 700S Sea King, etc). For the Sea Harrier, Instead of 700H continuing the suffix theme, they picked 700A, to show that the Navy was back in the fixed-wing business. [Edit: incidentally, I strongly suspect that the choice of 809 NAS to be the 2nd F35B squadron is to make the same point. From time to time (at least twice in my lifetime, for instance) the RAF have been known to claim that they have "finally killed off Naval fixed wing". The choice of a Phoenix rising from the flames (which is 809's badge) is, I suspect, making the same "not so fast..." point as 700A's Alpha.] Stunning model, anyway! Edited July 17, 2017 by Ex-FAAWAFU 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 17, 2017 Author Share Posted July 17, 2017 Thanks for answer and reply Ex-FAAWAFU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 20, 2017 Author Share Posted July 20, 2017 Some work done 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 21, 2017 Author Share Posted July 21, 2017 Maybe I was wrong in something , prompt i correct something detail ... Many thanks !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xffw45343tg Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) I'm not convinced about the shape of the Lerx Vitaliy. The curve looks a bit too deep to my eye - i.e. the radius seems too short at a point level with the aft edge of the formation light. It also looks a little lower down than the real thing, such that the triangular panel is at a slightly exaggerated angle. I'm being very picky here, but I think that is what you are asking. Kirk Edit: Compare with your picture of Monday at 8:46. Earlier shape looks better to me. Edited July 21, 2017 by Kirk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 21, 2017 Author Share Posted July 21, 2017 Hello Kirk ! Thanks for the answer ! If it's not difficult to you , please label on the photo what need to change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 21, 2017 Author Share Posted July 21, 2017 Corrected the radius 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vitaliy Posted July 22, 2017 Author Share Posted July 22, 2017 I continue ... The top is refined and bay*s too... If there is advice, I will listen to it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xffw45343tg Posted July 22, 2017 Share Posted July 22, 2017 No advice - but I love the way that you do clearly do masses of research so we don't have to. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now