Jump to content

Airfix 1/72nd Handley-Page Victor B Mk.2 (Blue Steel)


Recommended Posts

General (Andy) what a wonderful way to end the modelling year. I have really enjoyed all your beautiful builds and look forward to seeing more great stuff in 2017. 

 

When you get the chance, can you please post some photos and any additional information regarding the early B.2 fin root fairing. I'm toying with the idea of building mine in similar guise and would be very greatful for any guidance with this hopefully fairly straight forward conversion. 

 

Cheers and Merry Christmas.. Dave 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks chaps, glad you like it, it was an absolute pleasure to bang together, it's total build time being less than five weeks....

 

Richard, I can't recommend the model highly enough, just a few things needed to bring the kit to full Blue Steel configuration which I covered in the article. Glad you liked the article hopefully it made some sense !

 

Dave, cheers and Happy Christmas...I'll certainly be doing a WIP on the early B2, a good pal of mine cast a resin replacement for the smaller fin root intake on the Matchbox kit a few years back and I'm hoping it'll fit directly onto this one, the only issue being that the fin is part of the fuselage which is great for alignment but not so good for conversion to earlier aircraft due to the big hole that'll result, or for that matter BMk.1/A conversion, (which is something else I'll be doing later down the line as we at the BC SIG also need a few K1/1A's).

 

Cheers all

 

Melchie 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

General Sir

A beautiful rendition of what is in my unworthy opinion the most beautiful large aircraft ever to fly off the designers drawing board.  Kind of a Sophia Loren/ Audrey Hepburn of the aviation world that makes one weak at the knees.

 

Must grab a copy of your article too Sah!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Splendiferous job on the Victor, old wombat! This is a kit that is definitely registering on my extremely powerful modelling radar. Re the 'Red Neck' trials, did the aircraft sport some rust stains and some unpainted car primer, perchance (a bit of Texas/Southern humour there). I suppose the bomb bay doors were screen doors.

 

Bestest for the Holidays,

 

Jason

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, I totally agree, a beautiful design, even more so before they added lumps and bumps all over it. I've mentioned it many times but as a young nipper growing up in the sixties a few short miles from the threshold at Radlett, and with my house and primary school directly under the flight path I grew up seeing these aircraft daily, (sometimes even at the weekend when on test) which left a powerful impression on my young mind. These things looked like they'd come straight out of the pages of a Dan Dare comic or from the latest episode of Thunderbirds. A simply fantastic time to live through as an aviation nut, (we had DeHavilland/HS on the other side so got our daily fill of Comets, Tridents and 125's as well) the sky was full of wonderful shapes and sounds back then...a far cry from today..

 

Please grab away...;)

 

Ah Jason old fruitcake, as far as I can ascertain the Red Neck (or 'Yee-Ha' trials as they were known) didn't have much by way of red primer/rust involved however the modified Conways fed by swamp gas did have a slight Southern drawl and I believe the acoustic testing involved some five stringed banjos and a jaw harp....:guitar:

 

Yes Happy hols...

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lovely build Andy, one of my favourite V bombers, even bought the Rareplanes vac form model back in the early eighties before the matchbox kit arrived, alas my modelling skills back then were not that good and I only built one wing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I echo the thoughts about the form of the aircraft. I defnitely got a better appreciation for the shape during my build. I'm not a SME on this aircraft, and it's the first time I've ever built one. So I can see why some you call this jet a fave.

 

However, comma...

this is the second Airfix kit in a row that is subpar from the standard it has set in the past few years. They are not trending upward anymore. I know Hornby and Airfix have had a tough year. And this release, as well as the P-40 are indicative of that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well thanks chaps, plenty of Christmas spirit around here, cheers one and all....

 

Cheers Tony and Neil, you must get at least one, the BC table needs to be covered in lovely Victors....and the odd Lanc of course :winkgrin:

 

Steve, well I hope the kit does well, a decent Victor was well overdue...all we need now is a Vulcan !

 

Kev, cheers for that,  wow I remember the Rareplanes and NOVA vac's...a lot of hard work...at least you got one wing done better than nothing. One would look great parked next to your Viccy10...

 

Habu, sorry to hear this, what was wrong with your moulding ? I agree that some sub assemblies don't fit as well as they should especially at the price point, the bomb bay doors are a couple of mm too short, the open airbrake assembly bulkheads need shaving back to fit and top wing to fuselage assembly needs a bit of work, (I mentioned this in the article). I guess as a scratch-builder I'm used to sorting these thing out on the fly but you have a point when it comes to expecting it to fit together reasonably well out of the box...

 

 

Edited by general melchett
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Habu12 said:

I echo the thoughts about the form of the aircraft. I defnitely got a better appreciation for the shape during my build. I'm not a SME on this aircraft, and it's the first time I've ever built one. So I can see why some you call this jet a fave.

 

However, comma...

this is the second Airfix kit in a row that is subpar from the standard it has set in the past few years. They are not trending upward anymore. I know Hornby and Airfix have had a tough year. And this release, as well as the P-40 are indicative of that.

 

Pleas can you substantiate "subpar"?  No kit is perfect (not even, for example, the allegedly perfect Tamiya Mosquito) so please elucidate on what makes this kit less than perfect.  I've found a few minor niggles, but nothing that can't be lived with or dealt with by a reasonably competent modeller (or even someone with my limited abilities) and nothing as awkward as having to take a scale foot off the height of the fin of a Mosquito.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spiffing job your Lordship.

(I had a peek at the new year honours list)

I suppose you'll have to get

the builders in again to extend

Melchett towers for all the other

Victors you're planning to build?

Or are you planning to burrow

into Waddingtons hillside?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete, ah good news the New Years Honours Melchett Foundation cheque must have gone through.....being a fellow Lincolnite you well understand the problem with the substrata surrounding the land beyond the Edge and the load bearing limitations of  the underlying granite bedrock.......once the chaps have finally finished far**ing around  at Waddington they will be coming over here en mass with the heavy lift gear in preparation of the task ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, wow wow wow! :worthy: Beautiful aircraft, and a wonderful execution on the kit! The kit looks absolutely lovely and I do like the super clean look.

I just recently finished the old Revell Victor in desert storm scheme, and I have to say that wasn't a pleasure to build. Now that I see what you've done with Airfix's Victor, I'm tempted to do another one!

Glad to see this one features the boundary layer fences next to the intakes.

Oh, and did you happen to snap any pictures of the cockpit? I'd love to see the detail on that!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Overpin, appreciated. Yes the old Matchbox/Revell victor can be a bit of a challenge, I know I built three of them ! The fences are nicely rendered and actually angle in slightly as per the real thing.

I do have an image of the cockpit, bear in mind that the seat belts, ejection seat pull handles and harnesses are all from the spares box though I'm sure Eduard will be along soon with a pre painted set....

 

One thing I will say regarding the build though is put the instrument panel coaming in BEFORE closing the fuselage up....Airfix would have you slide it in afterwards but this is asking for trouble as it will almost certainly mean damage to the seat detail and coaming, the fit is real tight and awkward to get at !

 

Cheers..

 

DSC_4147_zpsdrxky8s1.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, general melchett said:
3 hours ago, stever219 said:

 

Pleas can you substantiate "subpar"?  No kit is perfect (not even, for example, the allegedly perfect Tamiya Mosquito) so please elucidate on what makes this kit less than perfect.  I've found a few minor niggles, but nothing that can't be lived with or dealt with by a reasonably competent modeller (or even someone with my limited abilities) and nothing as awkward as having to take a scale foot off the height of the fin of a Mosquito.

Habu, sorry to hear this, what was wrong with your moulding ? I agree that some sub assemblies don't fit as well as they should especially at the price point, the bomb bay doors are a couple of mm too short, the open airbrake assembly bulkheads need shaving back to fit and top wing to fuselage assembly needs a bit of work, (I mentioned this in the article). I guess as a scratch-builder I'm used to sorting these thing out on the fly but you have a point when it comes to expecting it to fit together reasonably well out of the box...

 

 

 

Ok, so let me start by saying that it's not a bad kit. Not at all, it's certainly an order of magnitude better than the Revell kit. (I know I mentioned I never built a Victor before, but I did start that kit and gave up)

I'd give this kit a 3.5 out of 5. As I'm not a Victor SME, I can't comment on accuracy, but the shapes look right to me. So  imagine it's the best kit of it in 1/72 so far. Concur? 

 

What I can confidently comment on, is the overall state of quality of Airfix kits. This marks my 43rd project of the new Airfix tooling era. And this and the P-40 are the first real steps back I've experienced. Starting with the fit, the engine nacelles left large gaps. The seams down the intake trunks are also hugely prominent. The flare with the fence near the wing root is also nastily gapped. Wing root fit to the fuse also requires shimming. The top overlap on the fuse also left a nasty step. 

The panel lines are highly inconsistent. One half of the fuse had deep and wide lines, the other half had thin shallow ones that didn't seem to want to take a wash, as they were too shallow. The top of the wings also had the same problem. 

Also his new plastic, I'm not sold on. I far prefer the older, lighter softer. I know I may be in a minority there, but I abhor filling and sanding. And the old plastic made that but easy. I don't like to have to modify, scratchbuild, or enhance a lot during a build. I build almost completely OOB, and the last three years of Airfix toolings have made that more and more enjoyable. I didn't need to do a lot of that abhorrent filling and sanding. But more importantly, I've had little fit issues, until now. I experienced them in just about every area on this build. 

These same comments can be applied to the P-40B. That's two in a row from Airfix. Something that hasn't happened yet in the Hornby era. So I reiterate that the tough year they've had has definitely manifested itself, and while I hope to the force that changes, the writing on the wall isn't encouraging. 

Edited by Habu12
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...