Jump to content

The EDSG Files # 2: Fairey Barracuda 1/72


Recommended Posts

On 17/01/2017 at 2:58 PM, TheBaron said:

That's what swung the judges for me in the South London Male Beauty Awards in 1988...

 

 

I heard it was the shuttlecock down the front of your shorts, that made the difference, you being a big Wham! Fan.

 

The previous attempt in 1987 with the shuttlecock down the back of the shorts was signicantly less successful ;)

 

Really enjoying following this project keep up the good work :clap2:

 

cheers Pat

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Spadgent said:

 I'm doing that with my flaps

 

Jont.

Ok, I fnarred at that :rofl:

As for me, I am sitting here vacillating, which brings a tear to the eye, but isn't quite as painful as sitting on the fence :analintruder:

Staying right away from that :worms:

All I can say is 'good luck, we're all counting on you'

 

Phil

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tomo, Johnny, Alex, Adrian: many thanks for that. You've put iron in the soul and the wing shall remain off until the end.

 

Bill: You'll find this hard to believe but I've had more than one pair of glasses fall apart that way. Did I mention that I'm slow at making connections sometimes?:banghead:

 

Jockney: Thanks for that. :thumbsup2: The chafing off them shuttlecocks is something cruel ain't it?:coolio:

 

Cheers Phil. I needed a fellow vacillator to back me up.:rolleyes:

 

I was just testing you all of course about the wing... I meant to leave it off the whole time:whistle::lol:

 

Rumpled of the Baileys...

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those lamp thingies at the end of the wings look as exceedingly nice as a number of Mr. Kipling's cakes :thumbsup2: .

 

Splendid work Mr Le Baron.

 

I am also in the 'after' camp for the bent wing. 

 

Regarding 'lost parts' (fnar) Mrs T (also a member of rival site 'BritModeller's wives'), can always seem to find a lost 1/72 pilot's monocle, when I'm on day three of pretending I'm not looking for such an absurd yet sleep depriving item:unsure:.

 

How these wonderful and tolerant (better) other halves do it I will never know.

 

I spotted on your profile that on Jan 15th you got a BM 'OBE'. Well done young man :thumbsup2: . It's all downhill from here :P:D.

 

TT 🐯 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still looking as good as ever! I did happen to stumble upon this video in You tube of some fancy flying footage of the Barra. Not sure if you've seen the footage? It is not very clear and has an annoying watermark on it, but there are some nice shots in there.

 

 

My favourite is the folding sequence where you have one man guiding the wing back and then another two people holding onto him to ensure the wing doesn't swing into the back of the aircraft taking out the tail, there must have been a lot of momentum in them there wings! I bet trying to spread them on board in a 40 knot head wind would take a herculean effort. Any hoo enjoy and keep up the cracking work!

 

Bob

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those lights are brilliant, little works of art in their own right. I know I'm a bit late but I would also leave the wing off during painting and decalling, leave it off as late as you can.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nigel Heath said:

Those lights are brilliant, little works of art in their own right. I know I'm a bit late but I would also leave the wing off during painting and decalling, leave it off as late as you can.

Him I agree with

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TonyTiger66 said:

I am also in the 'after' camp for the bent wing. 

 

Regarding 'lost parts' (fnar) Mrs T (also a member of rival site 'BritModeller's wives'), can always seem to find a lost 1/72 pilot's monocle, when I'm on day three of pretending I'm not looking for such an absurd yet sleep depriving item:unsure:.

 

How these wonderful and tolerant (better) other halves do it I will never know.

Cheers TT. You're quite right. I have the far-seeing gaze of a philosopher allied to a complete inability to find my socks...

5 hours ago, rob85 said:

I would paint them stick, it will be annoying to paint when on and you will probably end up knocking it off.

Message received Rob. You're exactly right in anticipating the sequence of calamities that would likely have engulfed me the other route.

3 hours ago, moaning dolphin said:

Still looking as good as ever! I did happen to stumble upon this video in You tube of some fancy flying footage of the Barra. Not sure if you've seen the footage?

Bob  - that is just superb! I've seen nothing like it with regard to showing the articulation of the various parts of the aircraft. I'm most grateful to you for unearthing this gem.:thumbsup:

2 hours ago, Nigel Heath said:

Those lights are brilliant, little works of art in their own right. I know I'm a bit late but I would also leave the wing off during painting and decalling, leave it off as late as you can.

Cheers Nigel. Very very late it will be as it's one bit I'm dreading given the amount of face I could lose for it going pear-shaped in the final innings...:pray:

58 minutes ago, perdu said:

Him I agree with

I find your level of agreement agreeable on aggregate.

 

All thoughts of a swift return to the bench tomorrow are scuppered as I have to go into work to host an open day. Don't ask.:rant: I shall sit greeting members of the public whilst behind my vacant smile will be a mind running through it's list of Barracudery tasks, light-years away.

 

I hope you get some time in yourselves!

 

More anon,

:bye: Tony

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheBaron said:

*can't

 

You're welcome. ^_^

You are, of course, assuming that the error was the apostrophe, not the vowel.......:D

 

Ian

Edited by limeypilot
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, limeypilot said:

You are, of course, assuming that the error was the apostrophe, not the vowel.......:D

:rofl:I'm not prepared to believe that of dear Bill...:o

 

Is it possible he meant the God of Play Away, Brian Cant?

brianc.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PLAY AWAY!

I'm a bean, I'm a bean, what sort of bean am I?

Has been?

 

 

Toni Arthur - subject of many a schoolboy crush.

And the other bloke, what was his name... Jeremy Irons. What happened to him I wonder?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CedB said:

PLAY AWAY!

Sweetest of all, I'm now watching that clip at the same time on a Saturday afternoon that it used to be on!

4 hours ago, CedB said:

Toni Arthur - subject of many a schoolboy crush.

Her milkshake brought all the boys to the yard long before Kelis'....

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Cant. An essential component of a well rounded British childhood (along with Lesley Judd's...).

 

I loved his songs in Trumpton, Chigley and Camberwick Green. Quite possibly the one 'Life Goes By When You're The Driver Of A Train' is my favourite.

 

They really don't make them like that any more. Wonderful stuff. 

 

Lord Belborough and Brakett the butler for your delectation :):

 

 

Slightly off topic, but I hope in a very nice nostalgic way..

TT

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmm, Trumpton.....That name may take on a whole new meaning soon...... Trumpton, D.C. does have a certain ring to it and with his ego who knows?

Ian

Edited by limeypilot
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, perdu said:

S'amazing where a lost, lonely and forgotten appersterophe can take us

 

Chigley huh, I saw them, Trumpton and Camberwick Green with my son at my knee

 

What's not to love?

The gentleness and humour of those things is regrettably something in short supply in our time now. I shudder to think at some of the violent obscenities that Youtube has opened up to minds too young to comprehend and emotionally process what they are seeing.

4 hours ago, 71chally said:

I would stick the wing on now Tony, keep the larfs rolling in!

Somebody woke up a comedian this morning... :lol: No. I will not be goaded.:rolleyes:

 

I will however let you see my latest wheeze for the canopy (probably just reinventing the wheel but I like it) below.

 

3 minutes ago, limeypilot said:

hmmm, Trumpton.....That name may take on a whole new meaning soon......

Judging by the deceit over the crowd size at the inauguration, I'm just expecting an administration of continuous lies...

 

First up, I stopped dawdling and got the Youngman structure finished off for the port (non-folded) wing. Same procedure as before re: tubing etc

32418792436_eed7248180_c.jpg

That will of course be stuck on last, along with the starboard wing. Not before. Looking at you James....

 

That shallow drilling angle required to make the opening in the wing for the brass tubing to enter was a bit problematic, so I had recourse to my old favourite of 'heat the needle':

32458802075_9da0aa8c3d_c.jpg

20 seconds flat and you're done, with n0 attendant risk of the drill skittering out of its hole and suddenly adding some unexpected panel lines...

 

Despite some slight undersizing, I'm going with the kit wheels, using the mid-wartime version supplied:

32307494992_9a8842a289_c.jpg

The complexity of the glasshouse has been causing me to ignore it but the time for dalliance is passed. With open canopies, I've grown increasingly unhappy with the frame definition - or rather  lack thereof - that you can see here, compared to what is visible on the real aircraft:

32418793436_78185a10be_c.jpg

I'm talking mainly about the rear edge of that transparency, where the sliding portion slides forward to meet it. Let's get Maureen in:

tumblr_nrd21unudH1rwiivfo5_400.jpg

You can see the frame stands proud on the real thing compared to the more flush version in the kit part, ergo, some extra definition is needed:

32337496731_c77e47c10f_c.jpg

I've re-frames the existing part with Microstrip as you can see:

32418791586_6275360798_c.jpg

This also incidentally solves the problem of missing length from the part caused by the width of the original saw cut:

31647066313_b8d2f665c2_c.jpg

For my liking it re-introduces a greater sense of solidity and believability in this region of the aircraft. You get a wider view of what I mean here:

239.jpg

and here:

pretoria-castle-escort-aircraft-carrier-

regarding the varieties of scale and solidity in the framing of that long glasshouse.

 

That's probably it for the day. Mrs. B's back with the shopping and I heard kippers mentioned. I presume it's fish and she hasn't bought me a tie....

:bye: Tony

 

 

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...