Hook Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 10 hours ago, charlie_c67 said: You need to moisturise Or sand. Cheers, Andre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 Hi, everyone, Not necessarily self-promoting, but this is the build I had going on when this thread started. Hope the esteemed readership like it. http://www.modelingmadness.com/review/mod/us/usaf/rol16c.htm Fernando 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomBigStu Posted December 14, 2016 Share Posted December 14, 2016 (edited) On a related note, Can one do a polish block52 example using a hasegawa boxing as base? I know theres going be niggles like panel lines & vents but I'm a big picture guy. Edited December 14, 2016 by PhantomBigStu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fernando Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Hi, PhantomBigStu, You would have the same inconvenients, only a bit aggravated, and some new ones. If you use the earlier C (kit B02) you ll have the NSI/P&W combo, as it is basically a Block 25. But you ll lack the heavy duty landing gear and I guess the wider wheels. Of course the bulged doors. You ll have to outsource the tail extension. Probably the gun vents are the early configuration. Nothing in the way of appropriate weapons; neither the appropriate wingtip launchers. Instrument panel I bet it is an A. Of course the upper fuselage panelling is an A, but that s a common thing. Fernando 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomBigStu Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 Oh thats a disappointing, looks like I'll abandon that plan then, stick with standard stuff. Maybe if I can get a hasegawa sufa cheap I can do a twinstick one.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomBigStu Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 (edited) 10 hours ago, Fernando said: Hi, PhantomBigStu, You would have the same inconvenients, only a bit aggravated, and some new ones. If you use the earlier C (kit B02) you ll have the NSI/P&W combo, as it is basically a Block 25. But you ll lack the heavy duty landing gear and I guess the wider wheels. Of course the bulged doors. You ll have to outsource the tail extension. Probably the gun vents are the early configuration. Nothing in the way of appropriate weapons; neither the appropriate wingtip launchers. Instrument panel I bet it is an A. Of course the upper fuselage panelling is an A, but that s a common thing. Fernando actually just released all the bits aside from the tail extension (and the IP which I don't care about) is in the block 50 boxing so perhaps this is a go after all....and actually the tail extension is in the revell, which I'm likely to also do so if I pick an example without the extension I'm good to go Edited December 15, 2016 by PhantomBigStu 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now