Jump to content

1/72 - Bristol Bombay Mk.I by Valom - released - new boxing


Homebee

Recommended Posts

Valom is to release a 1/72nd Bristol Bombay Mk.I (African campaign) kit - ref.72097

Source: http://www.valom.net/index.html

Box art

mini_72097%20Bristol%20Bombay%20Mk.I%20(

And we are still waiting the

Bristol Bombay Mk.I - ref.72056

Source: http://www.hannants.co.uk/product/VAL72056

VAL72056.jpg

Bristol Bombay Type 130 - ref.72055

Source: http://www.hannants.co.uk/product/VAL72055

VAL72055.jpg

V.P.

MattMemory2.jpg

Edited by Homebee
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Actually have my hands on one as picked it up from not so LHS today. Looks ok, but I have not had a chance to go over it in any detail. Not cheap, but it is a biggish aeroplane and you get a fairly full box. Mine is moulded in tan plastic with minimal flash, There is engraved panel lines that do not look too bad and a good level of detail, for xample the props look usable. Fully fitted cockpit and turret detail, although i am not sure about the guns, look like Brownings rather than Vickers 'K', but there are ammunition drums for the fuselage sides. Transpernacies are injection moulded. I cannot comment on the fit as I have yet to play with it that much so keeping fingers crossed. The front turret and bomaimers transperancy are all one which is but jointed on the front of the fuselage, which from experience of other kits e.g. MPM hudson is not ideal. Resin engines that look goo at first site and PE for instrument panels,seat belts etc. and the underfuselage bomb racks. Instruction look as if they are usable and th decal sheet has RAF roundels in quite bright colours. my personal view is that they might be better in the duller colours. Looks promising and i will try to get some pictures up tomorrow.

Edited by Martin T
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On further inspection of mine, I note that the rear turret is in two parts that meet down the centre line. I cannot find any photos that show clearly wether the rear turret had a framing down down the centre or not. Thanks for the photos saved me the hassle of tussling with Photobucket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing the kit props with Aeroclub P 087 I would suggest that the Valom props need reshaping to something more sword-like than their present cleaver shape. Shouldn't be hard to fix.

Edited by dalea
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish companies like Valom would just go all plastic. What's the point in doing 99% of the kit in plastic and then doing 1 or 2 parts in resin? Those engines look rough and would be better in plastic.

i think part of the problem with resin is although resin casting is much better than it was, it is still not an exact science and can vary from kit to kit. The engines on my kit look very good and better than most plastic ones I have seen, but you have to cut them from the pouring plug and hope you have done it right so that they fit to what they are meant to. I do not know why they chose to do them seperately, perhaps they are bought in from the same people as cast the engines for eg Azur/ Special Hobby who have used resin Pegaus engines and it is cheaper than tooling them up. Just a thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish companies like Valom would just go all plastic. What's the point in doing 99% of the kit in plastic and then doing 1 or 2 parts in resin? Those engines look rough and would be better in plastic.

In a similar vein, I'm not a fan of aerials/DF loops in PE. Presume in lower-pressure injection moulding it's not possible to get them scale thickness, but at least they're 3D.

Despite which, and some of the kit's other quirks (e.g. no cabin detail save for 3 ammunition drums) I'm really enjoying building it.

Edited by Tripehound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think part of the problem with resin is although resin casting is much better than it was, it is still not an exact science and can vary from kit to kit. The engines on my kit look very good and better than most plastic ones I have seen, but you have to cut them from the pouring plug and hope you have done it right so that they fit to what they are meant to. I do not know why they chose to do them seperately, perhaps they are bought in from the same people as cast the engines for eg Azur/ Special Hobby who have used resin Pegaus engines and it is cheaper than tooling them up. Just a thought

If these companies want to include resin then ok but they should at least make the same part available in plastic as not everyone likes resin. It make me wonder if they're losing sales because of that. There seems to be quite a few kits out recently that are 99% plastic and then they do 1 or 2 parts in resin. It just seems so pointless to me and why don't they just go the whole hog and make it all plastic?

They'll probably get more sales and then if people want some resin parts they can go to the aftermarket guys.

In a similar vein, I'm not a fan of aerials/DF loops in PE. Presume in lower-pressure injection moulding it's not possible to get them scale thickness, but at least they're 3D.

Despite which, and some of the kit's other quirks (e.g. no cabin detail save for 3 ammunition drums) I'm really enjoying building it.

Photoetch can be a right pain. I try and avoid it as much as possible....... just using it for a few things like seatbelts etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...