Andrew D Jolly Rogers guy

Now the interior. The Classic's side panels seemed best, except I liked some of the details on the Revel Cabriolet better. Solution: graft the details onto the better panels. The Classic's seat bottoms are terrific, but the Revell Cabriolet's seat backs are the closest to the real thing out of the 3 kit choices. Again, graft them together.

Thanks for the kind words! Got to splice the chopped door posts from the classic body onto the Super's convertible body. Always better to cut and graft too much, then cut it down to size. Then a bit of grinding and sanding to blend it all in.

Okay y'all, I must apologize for shelving this for a couple of years, but I've had a LOT to deal with, including a wedding, some health stuff, plus just got totally burned out on this due to the intensity of what I had to do to it (FAR more than I originally planned). Time to get this thing done. Major body modifications. Had to take pieces from the two Revell bodies and graft them to the Aoshima to reflect the correct vents, trims and such. Flat windscreen framing on the hardtop was too narrow, so I widened it with an insert of plastic, above and below. I'll worry about the windscreen itself later. The hood was a nightmare, part of the upper section being scratchbuilt.

Yep, makes it all the more fun Basically, I need something roughly AGM-65 Maverick sized. Not a huge punch, I know. If not missile, then precision bomb for sure.

lol...well...it's for the fictional-yet-really-neat-looking MiG-37. Making it a bit more plausible. Trouble is, I can't lengthen the bay, as it completely fills the space between the nosewheel bay and mainwheel bays, with absolutely no space in between the latter to go through. Was going to add a couple small under-shoulder bays for defensive AAMs, but still the question of the main payload, without which the design has no purpose. Tried looking at Dmitriy's site, but can't get it to translate, for some reason. I don't have the Harpia book, for one project. I've been searching the entire Kh missile series without any luck. Almost wondering if I should leave the bays open and empty now....

That one was my first choice as a weapon, except it is twice as long as the bay I need it to fit into, at 4.7-5.3m/15-17 ft....As the bay in 1/72 is only 3cm, it would have to be about a 2.1m weapon. Maybe I need to look into smart bombs instead?

Looking for suggestions for a Soviet/Russian guided air to ground weapon (preferably missile but I'm open to ideas) that would fit in a 1/72 3cm/1.25 inch weapons bay. Think this means something just over 200 cm or under 7 ft. Everything that I think looks interesting is about double that. Something from the 1980's through modern.

Other than the release entitled "F-117A Nighthawk w/GBU-27 Guided Bombs", are there any other releases of the Hasegawa F-117 which have a bomb bay?

I do understand what you're saying, completely, the morbidity of it. On the other hand, I think for many it's an homage, meant to honor the event that ultimately defines it. This, we modelers do with all sorts, both the good and the bad. I can't recall many non-July 1945 builds of the Indianapolis, and I wager most of the builds of the Hood are also from her final appearance. We also like to build fighter planes depicting them shortly after they score their aerial victories (good for one side only, naturally). I don't think it's because we like death, I believe it's more that we find ourselves reflecting on tragedy and feel compelled to honor it. For me, I guess it's more personal since I had the privilege of serving the Arizona's survivors who were aboard for her final appearance. Plus I just think the darker look (either gray or blue) is just meaner, which I like (I know many prefer the peacetime light gray appearance, just simple preference).

Hello all, Re: A-7D in the dark gray/dark green scheme, circa late 1980's. Says the dark gray goes back 6 feet into the intake, then "transitions" to white. Should I assume it to be a hard-lined difference between gray and white, or would "transitioned" imply a sprayed fog line?

Well, I've got to ask what specifically it was that put you off the Fly....I had heard there were issues, including the tires, and considered trying to stretch the Eastern Express to the -50 instead...but figured the Fly might be an alternative since it already comes with two fuselages. Already wondering if I chose poorly....

Yep, I found a Fly which is on its way; already planning to make resin copies of the mainwheels from the Eastern Express kit. Probably I should have specified, apologies! Since the kit comes with a standard -30 fuselage plus the intended -40 fuselage, my plan is to use sections of the -30 to expand the -40. EXTREMELY helpful info above, thank you so much!

Ok, at both ends, perfect; thank you! Now just a simple recalculation to 1/144 and that'll be it. Thanks again!

Question, when the -40 was lengthened by 8 ft to the -50, was all the new length in front of the wing? Or was it added to both ends for CG purposes?